Dear readers, I would like to bring you a news piece that happened recently somewhere in China, on December 15, 2023. Recently, the advanced on-demand session hosted by the well-known actor Qin Hao in a variety show was received a lot of bad comments from netizens, and what is surprising is that the reasons for the bad reviews given by netizens are surprisingly consistent.
First, let's review the incident. Qin Hao's advanced on-demand session hosted in the program is one of the links that the audience is looking forward to very much, but what is disappointing is that in the recent episodes of the program, Qin Hao's on-demand choice has caused dissatisfaction among the majority of netizens. Whether it is the subject matter judgment or plot development of film and television works, netizens generally believe that Qin Hao's on-demand broadcast completely deviates from their expectations and preferences.
Why are netizens so consistent in their reasons for bad reviews? This made me think about the entertainment industry and the needs of the audience. An actor's on-demand selection should be able to represent the tastes of the masses, or at least take into account the interests of a wide audience. However, Qin Hao's on-demand is far from this standard, and the film and television works he chooses are invariably contrary to the preferences of the vast majority of audiences.
This phenomenon has important implications for the entertainment industry as a whole. As an actor, Qin Hao should be more cautious when choosing on-demand, collect feedback from the audience extensively, and try to meet the public's expectations. Otherwise, both the actors themselves and the production team will face the risk of reputational damage and audience loss.
The incident also highlighted communication issues between the entertainment industry and viewers. As a popular actor, Qin Hao should always be sensitive to the audience's preferences and constantly interact and communicate with the audience. Only through effective communication with the audience can we better understand their expectations and needs, so as to better meet their movie-watching experience.
One of the potential solutions to this problem is to introduce a mechanism for more audience participation. For example, in the advance on-demand session, an online voting system can be set up to allow the audience to participate in the decision-making before the program is recorded. In this way, the actors can more accurately grasp the audience's preferences and avoid deviations from the audience's expectations.
In addition, the entertainment industry can also improve communication with viewers by establishing more open and transparent feedback channels. Actors and the program production team should encourage the audience to actively express their opinions and suggestions, and provide an equal and interactive environment so that they can keep abreast of the audience's evaluation and expectations of the program.
To sum up, Qin Hao's advance on-demand link in the variety show was met with bad reviews, and the reasons for the negative comments of netizens were surprisingly consistent. This incident has triggered thinking about the entertainment industry and the needs of audiences. Actors should pay more attention to the expectations and preferences of the audience, strengthen communication with the audience, and avoid going against the taste of the public. At the same time, establishing more audience participation and feedback mechanisms to promote the interaction between the entertainment industry and the audience is also an important way to solve this problem.
Let's hope that the entertainment industry can learn from this incident, better meet the expectations of the audience, and create more excellent works. It is only through thoughtfulness and improvement that the entertainment industry can remain dynamic and competitive in an ever-changing market.