What is the secret behind this huge number? 65.72 million people work in government institutions and institutions, what is the reason for this phenomenon?
Maybe it's the stable job treatment, maybe it's the relatively low work pressure, or maybe it's the allure of pension insurance.
The 2022 fiscal subsidy data for pension insurance shows that there may be deeper considerations behind the huge number.
Is it a guarantee of the system or a limitation of the job market?
The demographic dividend of 65.72 million people in government institutions and institutions?
When we dig deeper into the meaning behind this number, it's truly shocking.
That's 65.72 million people, which is equivalent to the total population of a medium-sized country!
The sheer size of this number makes people wonder how these people were attracted to government agencies and institutions.
Or rather, why do they choose to stay in this seemingly mundane work environment? The phrase "state organs are the graves of talents" cannot help but make people think deeply.
Perhaps, it is not a barren place, but there is a hidden attraction that attracts more and more people to come to it.
First of all, the stability provided by government agencies and institutions is undoubtedly an attractive factor that cannot be ignored.
Compared with private enterprises or start-ups, government institutions usually have a more stable working environment and treatment.
Here, workers can enjoy relatively fixed salaries and benefits, without worrying too much about market competition or the risk of company failure.
This kind of stability is desired by many people, especially those who want to be able to stabilize their lives and plan for the future.
Second, the relatively low work pressure of government organs and institutions is also a major factor in attracting people.
Compared with the fierce competition and heavy overtime work of private enterprises, government agencies and institutions usually work at a relatively stable pace and under less pressure.
Here, staff can handle work more easily and have more time and energy to devote to other aspects of life, such as family, hobbies, etc.
This relatively relaxed working environment attracts many people who crave a peaceful life.
Beneath these superficial appeals, however, lies a much more complex reality.
Government subsidies and pension insurance support for government agencies and institutions may be the key factor behind this phenomenon.
With the intensification of social aging and the increase of pension pressure, many people choose to work in government institutions and institutions in order to enjoy the relatively stable and reliable old-age security provided by the government.
This choice in reality may be an avoidance of future uncertainty, but it also reflects the influence of social institutions and policies.
Therefore, the phenomenon of 65.72 million people working in government agencies and institutions is not only a number, but also a collection of social phenomena.
It involves people's quest for stability, stress, and welfare, and it also reflects the influence of government policies and social institutions on people's choices.
The self-sufficiency rate of enterprise employees is against the sky
The comparison of pension insurance contributions and subsidies between the employees of enterprises and the staff of government agencies and institutions is indeed thought-provoking.
The amount of contributions paid by employees of enterprises is as high as 3.7 trillion yuan, which is a huge figure that highlights their efforts to save money for their retirement.
They seem to be more self-sufficient, relying on the income of their labor to support their retirement.
This high level of self-sufficiency reflects their employment stability and relatively high income levels.
In contrast, the self-sufficiency rate of pension insurance in government institutions and institutions is the lowest.
Their pension contributions do not seem to fully cover their future pension needs, so they need to rely on financial subsidies to stay afloat.
In this case, they seem to be more dependent on government support, as if they are eating on finances.
This may reflect the relatively low income level of the staff of government institutions and institutions, or their high expectations of future pension needs, and the need for more support from the government.
This difference in contributions and subsidies is not only a numerical comparison, but also a reflection of the differences in social status and welfare security between different groups.
A high self-sufficiency rate of employees may mean that they are relatively stable in terms of employment and income, while employees in government institutions may face more economic pressure and uncertainty.
They are the ones with the highest amount of subsidies?
When we delved into the pension insurance subsidy data, one of the surprising findings was that the per capita subsidy of government agencies and institutions was as high as 10,000 yuan!
This figure is a huge difference compared to other groups, such as farmers' subsidies of less than 200 yuan.
This huge disparity raises questions about fairness, why can government agencies and institutions enjoy such huge subsidies? What's behind this?
First of all, the phenomenon of per capita subsidies of up to 10,000 yuan in government organs and institutions may be related to its special nature.
Institutions play an important role in public services and administration than other sectors, so the government may be more willing to provide them with additional support to ensure their normal operation and service levels.
The high level of such subsidies also reflects the importance that the government attaches to public services, hoping to improve the efficiency and service quality of government institutions by providing more financial support.
Secondly, the phenomenon of high per capita subsidies of government agencies and institutions may also be related to the welfare of their employees.
Since government agencies and institutions are usually government departments or public institutions, their employees may enjoy relatively high welfare benefits, including pension insurance, medical insurance, etc.
The government guarantees the realization of these benefits by providing more subsidies to ensure the quality of life and social status of employees in government institutions and institutions.
However, this high subsidy also raises concerns about fairness.
Why are government agencies and institutions able to enjoy such huge subsidies, while other groups can only receive less support? Does this mean that there is an unfair distribution of resources?
epilogue
Behind the data on financial subsidies for pension insurance, there are many hidden secrets.
The demographic dividend of 65.72 million government institutions and institutions, the self-sufficiency rate of enterprise employees, and the highest amount of subsidies are actually ...... The reality behind this data makes people think and wonder.
Perhaps, we need more data and explanations to solve this mystery.
The above content is from the Internet, and the author of this article does not intend to target or insinuate any real country, political system, organization, race, or individual.
The above content does not mean that the author of this article agrees with the laws, rules, opinions, behaviors in the article and is responsible for the authenticity of the relevant information.
The author of this article is not responsible for any issues arising from the above or related issues, and does not assume any direct or indirect legal liability.
Note: It is not easy to be original, and plagiarism and manuscript washing will be studied deeply.
The picture comes from the Internet, if there is any infringement, please contact to delete.