laitimes

Bai Yansong said that the people were unwilling to spend money if they had money, and they were scolded on the hot search!

Bai Yansong said that the people were unwilling to spend money if they had money, and they were scolded on the hot search!

Bai Yansong said that the people were unwilling to spend money if they had money, and they were scolded on the hot search!

Bai Yansong was scolded by a large number of netizens again.

The reason why he was scolded was because he had this conversation with an expert on the show:

Bai Yansong said that the people were unwilling to spend money if they had money, and they were scolded on the hot search!
Bai Yansong said that the people were unwilling to spend money if they had money, and they were scolded on the hot search!
Bai Yansong said that the people were unwilling to spend money if they had money, and they were scolded on the hot search!

Bai Yansong asked the expert in the program: "The people have money, but they don't dare to spend it, they don't want to spend it, how do you see the problem that people are willing to spend money?"

Then, the expert freely expressed a large number of his own suggestions and opinions.

Bai Yansong and the experts sang and harmonized like this, which made many netizens unbearable.

Netizens said: Whether I have money or not, when was it completely defined by Bai Yansong? Will I not know if I have money or not? If I am really rich, I will still use you to teach me how to spend it? If I have money, I will not spend it? Are you stupid to me?

Bai Yansong said that the people were unwilling to spend money if they had money, and they were scolded on the hot search!
Bai Yansong said that the people were unwilling to spend money if they had money, and they were scolded on the hot search!
Bai Yansong said that the people were unwilling to spend money if they had money, and they were scolded on the hot search!

Bai Yansong, as a famous host, a famous commentator, a famous writer, the vice president of the Red Cross Society of China, and the vice president of the China Youth Volunteers Association, can be said to be a proper rich class.

However, it is such a rich man, but he frowns on TV and thinks about why ordinary people are not willing to spend money nowadays, which is a very funny scene no matter how you look at it.

Because this is very reminiscent of a story - it is said that there is a patient who has been unable to pull out, and the doctor gave him laxatives, Kaiseru, and all methods have been used, but this patient still can't pull out, and then the doctor called all the experts in the hospital to a meeting, and finally the experts unanimously decided to continue to increase the amount of laxatives! However, when the doctor went to the patient's ward and told the patient's family to increase the amount of laxatives, the family was stupid, and the family cried and said to the doctor, "Doctor, we are all so hungry that we can't open the pot, he hasn't eaten for three days, how do you let him?"

The above story, is it like Bai Yansong's brows are tightly knit and thinking about why the people are unwilling to spend money?

In this current environment, many people can't make money, and the people have no money, but you are thinking about why the people are not willing to spend money when they have money, and then ask the experts to give a bunch of suggestions, what do you say is the difference between this and the doctor giving a hungry ghost an increase in the amount of laxatives and then forcing him to?

Bai Yansong said that the people were unwilling to spend money if they had money, and they were scolded on the hot search!

Of course, if the doctor gives the hungry ghost laxatives, it is likely that the doctor is not skilled in medicine, or the doctor really does not know the truth.

But what about Bai Yansong, do you think he really doesn't know the truth?

With a human spirit like Bai Yansong, do you think he won't know the current social situation?

Anyway, I think there is a high probability that it will not.

So I think the reason why Bai Yansong presupposes the premise that "the common people are rich" is probably that he knows the current situation of the people today, but in order to cater to some people or things, he deliberately carried private goods.

As a well-known media person and a well-known media organization, it may seem like a small thing to deliberately carry some private goods on a very influential program, but in fact, its impact can be very large. Because this will not only mislead a group of people, but sometimes it may even destroy some people and even some families.

Reminds me of a clip from the recently popular TV series "News Queen".

It is said that there is a rich kid who had a car accident with an ordinary person because of drag racing and killed the ordinary person.

Then the rich boy immediately took out the wine bottle in his car and sprinkled it on the ordinary person's body, deliberately making the scene of the car accident smell of alcohol, so when the police and reporters arrived at the scene, they both smelled a smell of alcohol.

However, when the traffic police had not yet taken a blood test and did not determine whether the incident was caused by drunk driving, the rich boy and his father immediately spent a lot of money to bribe a very influential TV station in Hong Kong, and let them report the incident with private goods to clear the rich son's name.

After the female anchor of the TV station received this whitewashing task from her superiors, she didn't blink her eyes, saying that this kind of thing was too easy to do.

So what does this streamer do?

First of all, she objectively reported the whole process of the car accident on TV, and the time and place of the car accident were truthfully introduced, and she did not deceive the audience at all or violate professional ethics.

But at the end of the report, she added that our reporter smelled a strong smell of alcohol on the victim, and it is not certain whether the accident was related to drunk driving.

Then, she added another sentence - drunk driving is a kind of behavior that disregards the safety of oneself and others, and the relevant departments are currently increasing their efforts to crack down on drunk driving, and I sincerely hope that drunk driving will become less and less because of the measures of the relevant departments.

Bai Yansong said that the people were unwilling to spend money if they had money, and they were scolded on the hot search!

So when they saw the anchor say this, countless viewers thought that this incident must have been caused by drunk driving, so this rich second generation who caused others to die in drag racing was not only successfully whitewashed in the end, but also became a victim of drunk driving in the hearts of the public.

One truth is that the car accident caused by the rich second-generation drag racing car was finally because of an anchor's entrainment of private goods, which made countless viewers think that the car accident was caused by drunk driving, so countless viewers think that the victim is innocent.

was originally a victim, but in the end, because of a news anchor's words, the victim became the perpetrator, and in the end, the victim's reputation was ruined, and the reputation of the family behind him was also ruined.

So seeing this case, you should know how powerful a news anchor can be on a very influential TV show with a sentence of smuggling, right?

At the end of the article, I would like to mention this law to you again - "Hayne's Law".

Hayne's Law is that behind every major event discovered, there must be 29 minor incidents, 300 near-miss premonitors, and 1,000 hidden incidents.

Therefore, Bai Yansong was scolded on the hot search this time, if it was because he deliberately "entrained private goods" and was found by everyone and was scolded on the hot search, then according to the "Hayne's Law", how many hidden and more difficult to find "private goods" that Bai Yansong said in previous programs will there be? And how many individuals and how many families have been affected by his "private goods"?

Read on