Hello everyone, I am the leader of the moving average. In addition to stock trading, there are almost no other hobbies, just like to face the computer all day long, to the K-line chart, to compare and draw, if you also like a tool person like me, welcome to pay attention.
People are all naked K drawings, why do I choose to draw moving averages? Because naked K is too high and unfathomable, many people can't understand it, and what they see is in the clouds.
I use the moving average to draw the chart, it is very intuitive, at a glance, you can see what the current trend is, because there is a moving average pulling his trend.
Continue our moving average drawing Xi:
Find the position where the arrow No. 1 is drawn in the picture, and draw a horizontal line at the bottom of him, because we can't see the previous trend, then this position will not be included in the range and jump directly to the No. 2 position.
Does the No. 2 position conform to the principle of cutting-in? First of all, he is a multi-party gun, and the multi-party cannon is in line with it, but it does not meet it here. Because he is a multi-cannon that comes up from under the water, and this multi-cannon needs to be filtered.
And the trend below the five-day moving average has also risen so much, and after two consecutive big yangs, it has just touched the horizontal line of the No. 1 position. It can only be said that the rebound was snatched away by the one in front of him, and the one behind may only fall back, so this kind of thing is directly filtered out for him.
Does No. 3 conform to the principle of cutting? No. 3 does not meet either, No. 3 is just a weak rebound. Because he didn't touch the No. 2 level, that is, he had already broken the No. 2 level, and the weak rebound was directly filtered out for him.
Is the number four compliant? The number four is in line, first his bottom is not broken, that is to say, there is the support of the number three, and then it also breaks through the high. But because there is an upper shadow and there is a big black candle in front of his horizontal position, you need to wait for his step back like this.
Judging from the picture, he didn't step back the next day, but the good thing is that he closed a yin line, if it is a yang line, then the trend of the next day should be careful. The latter yang line, he is a piercing in the disk, we can't see it now, if it is found in the disk, then we can find an opportunity to cut in without revealing the bottom.
Let's draw another picture, the old rule, or find the position of the arrow marked with the number one, because the bottom in front of the first position is not visible, then jump directly to the second position.
Is the No. 2 position in line with the bottom of the No. 2 position, and his breakthrough is also in line, because he eats the front yin line, but he has a long upper shadow line, which will be confirmed the next day. However, as we can see from the picture, the next day it fell below the five-day moving average and also broke the bottom of the white candle, so this position is not in line.
Does the No. 3 position match? No. 3 doesn't match because he didn't break through the bottom of No. 2, so it's good to filter it directly.
First of all, although he broke the bottom of No. 3, he stood up again when he pierced the intraday closing, and also broke through the high of No. 3. But the body of this white candlestick is a bit large, and we can only wait for the next day to confirm.
However, he didn't step back the next day, didn't return to 1/3, 2/3 of the entity, and didn't step back to this position for a few days after that, so the steady part was directly missed, but it didn't matter, because this market has never been short of opportunities, just continue to wait for the next opportunity.
No. 5 doesn't, because his closing price is just above the five-day moving average, and there are so many hidden parts below it, which means he's already bounced underwater.
If you miss the section in position four, then this picture is almost completely filtered, and in the actual operation process, this point is often not enough, and it needs to be refined.
Just like the net of the fish, at the beginning of the five-day moving average, that is, the mesh is very thin, and the small fish and shrimp are netted. So now that he has gone through this filtering, it can only be said that those small shrimps have been filtered out, and his mesh has been enlarged a little, but this is far from enough, and the filtration needs to be increased in the future.
That's all for today's article.,Thank you for reading.,I hope you can like it before you leave.,Support it.,Thank you!
I am the leader of the moving average, and the above content is just some of my own insights in the process of operation, for communication only, not for reference. Especially some novice friends, please don't blindly carry and apply, this is also responsible for your own principal!
#文章首发挑战赛#