#文章首发挑战赛#
Shijiazhuang Baifo Vegetable Market recently issued a notice demanding the cessation of noodle processing and other businesses on the grounds of "air pollution", causing an uproar in public opinion. The notice was harsh and the penalties were severe, catching many merchants off guard. The abruptness of this notice has aroused doubts from the outside world, and some netizens are even worried that this is the beginning of restricting people's livelihood.
Two days later, the local government issued a circular, saying that the notice was issued "without authorization" by the White Buddha Vegetable Market, and that it had requested that it be withdrawn and that those responsible be held accountable. The government's statement calmed doubts for a while, but the public still had a lot of complaints about the matter. This article will elaborate on the ins and outs of the incident, analyze the social concerns aroused by the incident, and put forward several suggestions for dealing with it.
1. The full text of the notice of the White Buddha vegetable market
Due to air pollution, from now on, it will be ordered to stop noodle processing, cake processing, and pancake production.
2. The notice has been questioned and its reasonableness is questionable
As soon as the notice was released, it quickly set off an uproar on the Internet. Many Shijiazhuang citizens are unable to understand the logical relationship between noodle processing and air pollution control. Most of the noodle processing is carried out indoors, and the pollutants are not directly emitted into the atmosphere, so it is difficult to determine that they pollute the atmosphere.
At the same time, some of the details in the notice are puzzling. The source of the so-called "notice from the higher-ups" is unknown, and the environmental protection department does not appear to be involved in the permit. A single order to ask the merchant to close down is a bit sloppy. In addition, noodles are a staple food for many people, and once the work is suspended, it may have a certain impact on people's livelihood.
3. The official response said that the notice was in violation
Two days later, the Tangu Sub-district Office of Chang'an District, Shijiazhuang issued a briefing clarifying the details of the matter. The circular made it clear that the practice of the White Buddha Vegetable Market was wrong and that the relevant notice had been abolished. They will investigate and deal with the responsible person and require the merchant to rectify the situation. The briefing also said that they would learn from the lessons and prevent the recurrence of such problems.
Fourth, there are still many questions among the people
Although the local government's response has calmed some doubts, the public's concern about the matter has not diminished. Some netizens are worried that the name of environmental protection will be abused to rectify the people. It is reported that in recent years, environmental protection inspectors have often become a major "killer feature" that restricts the development of private enterprises. Some netizens questioned the official "rectification" measures, worried that the soup would not be changed.
Some netizens raised this matter to the level of governance concepts. They believe that treatment at the source is the most important, and the treatment effect of factory exhaust and motor vehicle exhaust is much higher than that of food processing, but some local governments do not pay enough attention to this. Some commentators have pointed out that this incident reflects the chaotic management of the grassroots government, which has shaken the public's credibility in it.
5. Recommendations:
This incident highlights the tension between environmental protection and development and people's livelihood. The author believes that cracking down on noodle processing is not the best way to control pollution. Relevant departments should not simply restrict normal production and business activities on the grounds of environmental protection, let alone change orders overnight, damaging the credibility of the government.
The specific recommendations are as follows:
1. Strengthen scientific argumentation. Strictly demonstrate the actual impact of noodle processing and other businesses on the environment, and avoid blind control that affects people's livelihood.
2. Increase supervision of key industries. Starting from the source, we should carry out supervision on key pollution sources such as industrial exhaust gas to prevent micro problems.
3. Clarify accountability. Track down those responsible for hasty documents to set an example and avoid the recurrence of such incidents.
4. Improve the environmental assessment system. Establish and improve the project environmental impact assessment system and standardize the environmental protection decision-making procedures.
6. Folk voices
In response to this incident and the follow-up treatment, public comments have come one after another, with mixed reviews.
Some netizens said: "We must seriously pursue responsibility, otherwise this kind of hasty practice will continue to happen." Government departments must improve the standardization and scientificity of their work, and must not joke about people's livelihood. ”
Some netizens also said: "In any case, the government departments that caused this incident are responsible." Its hasty attitude has already undermined the trust of the people, and 'rectification' is not enough, and only a radical change in style can re-establish authority. ”
Some netizens said: "This incident is more a reflection of the uneven level of local government governance and the problem of asymmetric information between the upper and lower levels." Similar incidents are not uncommon, and mere accountability cannot fundamentally solve the problem, and it is necessary to systematically improve the operating mechanism of the grassroots government, seek truth from facts, and be democratic and scientific. ”
To sum up, the attention aroused by the notice of the White Buddha Vegetable Market reflects the people's higher requirements for government governance. What the public wants to see is a pragmatic, efficient, democratic and scientific image of government. After this incident, the relevant departments must learn lessons from it, further improve the management level and service quality, effectively protect the vital interests of the people, and maintain the credibility of the government.
This topic: What do you think about this?Welcome to leave a comment below, if you like the article, please pay attention and like!