In the past few days, Beijing, Shanghai, Chongqing, Hunan, Tianjin, Guizhou and other provinces and cities have been approved one after another, virtually playing a symphony of a new round of institutional reform, and some reorganized new institutions have made their debut!
At present, the reform of provincial-level institutions is in full swing, but is the reform at the county and township levels still far away? At a time when the current structural reform is surging, what are the new trends that deserve your and me's common attention?
01 Hi
The institutional reform aims to build a smooth and dynamic work system, which is not only in line with the needs of the development pattern of the new era, but also a positive response to the stubborn diseases existing in the grassroots governance work, which has aroused the surprise and common expectations of many people of insight!
Yixi: Through this reform, the responsibilities of functional departments are more accurate, the boundaries are clearer, the responsibilities are more clear, and the operation of the organization is more standardized, which seems to make people see a new image of a more efficient and coordinated organ.
Erxi: Through this reform, the institutional setup and management system have been newly adjusted, and some institutions have not only had rigid constraints on scientific reduction, but also strived to create a new pattern of efficient operation and enforcement of orders and prohibitions.
Sanxi: Through this reform, some new working institutions will be born, gradually gain a higher status and more attention, the investment and support for social work will gradually increase, the system and mechanism will be further improved, the level of standardization and professionalism will also be continuously improved, and play an increasingly important role, and will make greater contributions to the development of society and the well-being of individuals. For example, the establishment of social work departments at all levels will certainly promote the work of law-based governance of grassroots society to a new level.
02忧
Institutional reform is a revolution from top to bottom, and it is still more a call that goes straight to the depths of the soul, and it will inevitably involve the future and destiny of many people! This change, which is not like in the past, has also made many people deeply worried.
One worry: Reform has a long way to go, and I am worried that it will not be thorough enough. Since the founding of the People's Republic of China, the mainland has carried out several institutional reforms, but all of them have fallen into a vicious circle of "streamlining, expanding, streamlining, and re-expanding," and the phenomenon of overstepping and displacing functions is still quite serious, and the work efficiency of the reformed organs has not achieved the expected results of "reducing personnel, affairs, and expenditures."
Second worry: The road to career is more uncertain. As the institutional reform takes root and new institutions are reorganized or established, some institutions and personnel will also be "transferred" to other departments to perform their duties, and the appointment and dismissal that was originally "finalized" may be followed by a "qualitative" change, and the promotion of the leader's "commitment" will most likely be "lost." This is undoubtedly a "heavy" blow to individual people who demand "progress."
Three worries: the channels for the diversion of surplus personnel are not smooth enough. The most troublesome problem in institutional reform is that there are few channels for the diversion of surplus personnel and it is difficult to dismiss non-staff personnel. At present, units at the county and township levels are overcrowded, and the payment of salaries to existing personnel in some public institutions has become a problem, and they are simply unable to accept new personnel. Therefore, it is difficult for surplus personnel to be truly diverted is the difficulty of reform, and the final result of each reform is a rebound in personnel, resulting in a good starting point for each reform, but the result is unsatisfactory, more in and less out, and the personnel downsizing has not yet come out of the historical circle.
03愁
The difficulties in the reform of administrative organs mainly lie in the operational difficulties in the reform of the institutions and the conceptual and behavioral stagnation of personnel to the reform, which constitute the greatest resistance to the reform.
One worry: where is the future of the individual? Through reform, we have created an environment in which cadres can be selected and employed on an open, equal, competitive, and merit-based basis, and a mechanism for selecting and employing cadres who can be promoted or demoted, promoted or discharged, effectively encouraged, strictly supervised, selected by competition, and full of vitality has been established. However, this is undoubtedly a great challenge for those who lack the ability to work, do not have a strong sense of innovation, and are on the older side?...... In short, the road ahead is fraught with uncertainty.
Second worry: It is difficult to transfer the staffing to fulfill the wish. In the course of reform, there are concerns about the abolition of units, the integration of institutions, the transfer of personnel, and the diversion and resettlement. If the vacant positions in the corresponding units of the resettlement personnel can meet the total number of people to be resettled, they can be resettled as a whole, and everyone has nothing to worry about; if the vacant positions cannot meet the overall resettlement, it is very likely that they will be partially resettled by means of examination and competition, and the rest of the personnel will have to be shunted to units or departments that have no connection with their previous work, and all work will start from scratch, which is a huge pressure for some people. The fate of the personnel who are also transferred from a unit may be very different: some people still retain their status as civil servants, while others can only be transferred to work in public service units or even public institutions.
Some units or departments that have not been abolished or integrated not only do their subordinate organs remain unchanged, but they are basically still in the same ranks. As a result, the merged department is still "soup is soup, water is water", and the boundaries of the past departments have not been broken, and they are deeply imprinted in the hearts of every employee. However, for the people who are diverted, their work changes a lot, everything is unfamiliar, not only the work content is very different, but also the work process and work rules are ...... We must all accept "re-education" and "return to the furnace for re-refining" and achieve "complete integration" and "rebirth from the ashes"! Moreover, being able to achieve "a bowl of water and a flat bowl" at work is a big question mark!
04 Pan
In line with the new trend of the new era, the footsteps of another round of institutional reform have disappeared, and grassroots party members and cadres across the country are full of expectations.
One hope: institutional reform is more down-to-earth. It is hoped that through the concentration of responsibilities and the integration of institutions, a cross-organizational and cross-departmental governance structure will be established, and the optimal allocation and efficient use of various social work resources will be coordinated and cohesive, and the forces inside and outside the system will be integrated under the guidance of the Party to form a systematic and scientific governance system.
Second hope: the efficiency of the organization is more efficient. After the reform, the professional standards and responsibilities of social work have been set up more scientifically and informatively, the code of conduct and service quality have been more standardized, the supervision and evaluation mechanism has been more powerful, and the efficiency of the organs has been improved.
Three hopes: Institutional reform is more humane. The salary income of public institutions and civil servants on the mainland is basically similar, and the salary income of some public institutions is even higher than that of civil servants. However, the benefits enjoyed by the two are not the same. Generally speaking, civil servants enjoy better benefits than those of career staff. For example, in a unit of the Letters and Visits Bureau, civil servants who are also engaged in petition work can enjoy the petition allowance, but the personnel of the establishment of public institutions are not entitled to it. From a certain point of view, it does not reflect social fairness and justice, and it is hoped that the state will consider institutional reform from the top-level design to be more humane, and career establishment personnel and civil servants can be paid equally for the same post, so don't chill the hearts of grassroots workers!
In short, this institutional reform is the only way for the Party to cope with the complex situation and promote the overall governance of society in the new era.
In the process of Chinese-style modernization, we must adapt to the new development requirements, actively integrate into the governance system of the Party and the state, explore new local practices, condense new development characteristics, and contribute to the modernization of social governance while promoting the high-quality development of social governance.
Conclusion: Take precautions, it is recommended to plan for your future in advance, strive to communicate and coordinate up and down, and establish a smooth information channel, so as not to delay your bright future!
Disclaimer: This article is an original creation, the picture is from the Internet, if there is any infringement, please contact to delete!If you support the author's point of view, welcome to follow, leave a message, like, more exciting content is looking forward to sharing with you!