Just recently, the verdict of the Beijing Municipal High People's Court came down, which corrected JD.com's name and supported those large and small businesses who were crawling in the market. In the e-commerce circle, Jingdong is really angry this time!
It all started a few years ago. At that time in 2013, JD.com stood up and publicly dissed Alibaba's "either-or" policy. That is to say, merchants can only choose one side between JD and Ali, and cannot step on two boats. As soon as this policy came out, the merchants were fried, who wants to be forced to stand in line?
By 2015, the dissatisfaction of the merchants was almost bursting, and JD.com took the lead in reporting Ali to the State Administration for Industry and Commerce with his real name. Later, in 2017, JD.com directly sued Alibaba. It was not until 2019 that the Supreme People's Court determined that the case was under the jurisdiction of the Beijing High People's Court.
No, in 2023, the court finally gave a verdict. Guess what? The court directly pointed out that Alibaba's "either-or" is a monopoly, which has caused serious damage to JD.com. As soon as this verdict came, Jingdong raised its eyebrows, and merchants and consumers also cheered.
JD.com issued a statement saying that fair competition is the core of the market economy. Those monopolistic behaviors of "choosing one or the other" not only restrict market competition, but also damage the rights and interests of brands, merchants and consumers, and weaken the innovation and vitality of the market. Jingdong said that in the future, they will continue to seek development for brands and businesses, compete for low prices for consumers, and help the high-quality development of the real economy.
In this Internet age, the comments of netizens always reflect the most real social emotions.
- "Anti-monopoly, this is still right, it is good for both merchants and sellers"
- "No wonder JD.com gave employees a salary increase today"
- "Pretty, pretty, pretty, pretty, pretty, good judgment!!"
- "Ali deserves it, you see what it has become now, just know how to squeeze merchants"
- "Choose one of the two, make it difficult to do business in the world, and the dragon slayer boy will eventually become an evil dragon"
- "In front of the law, large companies have to abide by the rules, and this judgment is reassuring. ”
----------------
Speaking of which, this e-commerce river and lake is really treacherous and unpredictable. Right under our noses, the two giants of JD.com and Alibaba staged a contest about choice. This matter is like the grievances of the market economy, and a judgment finally makes the banner of fair competition flutter in the sky of e-commerce.
Let's talk about the general environment of this market economy. In these days, who doesn't want to soar freely in the market and eat by their ability? However, once there is the shadow of monopoly, the market will no longer be the stage of free competition. JD.com was able to win the verdict this time, not only because they stood on the right side, but also because of their persistence, which made everyone see the importance of fair competition.
This is also a great encouragement for us ordinary people. After all, we live in this market, who doesn't want a fair environment that allows us to choose freely and enjoy better goods and services? JD.com's victory can be said to be a breath of relief to our consumers, telling us that as long as there is justice, we can enjoy a better market.
Going deeper, this verdict is not only a victory for JD.com, but also a victory for the market economy. It tells us that no matter how powerful you are, you can't have a monopoly or force others to take sides. The charm of the market economy lies in its freedom and fairness, and only by maintaining this spirit can our economy develop healthily and have more innovation and vitality.
#文章首发挑战赛#
#头条创作挑战赛#