Before reading this article, please click "Follow", which is not only convenient for you to discuss and share, but also can bring you a different sense of participation, thank you for your support.
CBA referee Song Houlu's outrageous work has made fans angryThe referee level of the CBA league has always been the focus of attention of fans and the media, especially in some important games, the referee's decision often causes controversy and questioning.
Among the many referees, there is a referee wearing the No. 54 jersey, but because of his outrageous work, he has become the target of fans and the media, he is the international referee Song Houlu.
Song Houlu's reputation did not accumulate overnight, and his controversial punishment was not once or twice.
As early as the beginning of this season, he fined A Dijiang 20,000 yuan because of his dissatisfaction with the head coach of the Xinjiang team, A Dijiang, in the match between the Xinjiang team and the Beijing team.
In the post-match interview, Adijiang expressed his incomprehension and dissatisfaction with Song Houlu's penalty, believing that Song Houlu's penalty affected the fairness and result of the game.
A Dijiang said that if you use the 20,000 yuan to buy meat buns, I don't know how many meals you can eat, which is much better than giving it to Song Houlu.
In the match between the Beijing team and the Guangzhou Dragon and Lions team, Song Houlu once again became the focus.
The referee of this game was Song Houlu, and one of his penalties in the game made the Guangzhou Dragon Lions' three-point shot canceled, and also made the head coach of the Guangzhou team, Guo Shiqiang, very dissatisfied.
The cause of the incident was that Jiang Wen of the Beijing team obviously faked a fall in an attack in an attempt to cheat the foul.
Song Houlu didn't see Jiang Wen's acting skills, but stopped the game and gave the Beijing team a sideline ball.
During the replay, Song Houlu found out that his penalty was wrong, but he did not give Jiang Wen a technical foul, but continued to execute the sideline ball.
At this time, a player of the Guangzhou team stole the sideline ball of the Beijing team and shot a three-pointer.
According to the rules, this three-point shot should be effective, but Song Houlu canceled this three-point shot on the grounds that he had already blown the game out.
This made the players and coaches of the Guangzhou team feel unacceptable, thinking that Song Houlu's punishment was unfair and biased in favor of the Beijing team.
In the post-match interview, Guo Shiqiang also expressed his dissatisfaction with the fake fall of the Beijing team, although he did not directly name Song Houlu, but his meaning was already obvious.
Not long ago, Song Houlu once again surprised people, he once again staged an outrageous penalty in the game between the Jilin team and the Guangdong team.
This game is the highlight of the season, with Jilin currently top of the league and Guangdong the defending champions, with both teams strong and intense.
With about 5 minutes left in the second quarter, Liu Tianyi of the Jilin team made a three-pointer in a counterattack, but when he landed, he was tripped by Weems of the Guangdong team.
Song Houlu stood beside Liu Tianyi and immediately blew the whistle and punished Weems for a foul.
This made the head coach of the Guangdong team, Du Feng, very incomprehensible, he thought that Weems's defense was not fouled, but Liu Tianyi was playing.
But Song Houlu did not listen to Du Feng's explanation, but insisted on his own punishment.
What's even more incredible is that Song Houlu punished Weems' blocking foul, not a shooting foul, that is, he thinks Weems's foul happened before Liu Tianyi made a shot, not after Liu Tianyi landed.
Such a penalty means that the Jilin team can only get one sideline ball, instead of three free throws.
This made the head coach of the Jilin team, Gao Junchao, very angry, and he believed that Song Houlu's punishment was wrong and was harming the interests of the Jilin team.
He had a heated argument with Song and opted to challenge the penalty in the hope of escalating Weems' foul to a stepping foul.
Foot foul refers to the defensive player in the opponent's shot, deliberately or unintentionally put his foot in the opponent's landing space, thereby affecting the opponent's balance and safety, this kind of foul is very dangerous, but also very serious, once awarded, not only will the opponent be given three free throws, but also to the foul player will be given a technical foul.
From the slow-motion replay, it can be clearly seen that when Weems was defending Liu Tianyi, he did have a foot pad action, and his feet occupied Liu Tianyi's landing space in advance, causing Liu Tianyi to fail to land normally, but fell to the ground.
Moreover, Weems' foul occurred after Liu Tianyi made a shot, that is, it was a typical three-point shooting foul, and Liu Tianyi should have been given three free throws.
These are obvious facts, as long as anyone with a little basketball common sense, can see.
But Song Houlu turned a blind eye, and after he watched the video back, he actually maintained his original verdict and did not change any punishment, so that the Jilin team could only execute the sideline ball.
This made Gao Junchao and the players of the Jilin team feel unbearable, and they protested to Song Houlu one after another, but Song Houlu was unmoved, and threatened to impose technical fouls on the Jilin team.
This scene reminds me of Gong Xiaobin's classic quotations, blowing nonsense, holding a whistle, and making mistakes one after another.
This kind of referee makes people doubt his professionalism and impartiality, and also makes people question his motives and purposes, whether he is playing fair or for other interests? Is he protecting the safety of the players, or is he trying to harm the players' bodies? Is he maintaining the order of the game, or is he breaking the rules of the game? Song Houlu's outrageous work not only made fans and media feel angry and disappointed, but also made players and coaches feel helpless and aggrieved, and seriously damaged the image and reputation of the CBA league.
As an international-level referee, Song Houlu should be a role model and benchmark for the CBA League, and should use his professional level and fair attitude to ensure the fairness and quality of the game, win the respect and trust of fans and the media, and improve the level and influence of the CBA League.
But Song Houlu did the opposite, he used his outrageous penalties to destroy the fairness and quality of the game, to lose the respect and trust of fans and the media, and to reduce the level and influence of the CBA league.
Such referees are the shame and scourge of the CBA league, the enemy and obstacle of the CBA league, and the cancer and garbage of the CBA league.
In my opinion, the management of the CBA league should seriously deal with and punish Song Houlu's outrageous punishment, should investigate and review him, should educate and train him, should supervise and evaluate him, should warn and fine him, and even should suspend and fire him.
Only in this way can Song Houlu realize his mistakes and consequences, can Song Houlu correct his behavior and attitude, can Song Houlu improve his level and quality, and can Song Houlu restore his credibility and status.
If Song Houlu is still unrepentant and continues to behave mischief, then I suggest that the management of the CBA league directly expel him from the referee team of the CBA league, let him disappear from the CBA league stage forever, let him lose his qualifications and opportunities in the CBA league forever, and let him become the history and joke of the CBA league forever.
In the 14th round of the CBA League, the Jilin Northeast Tigers challenged the defending champion Guangdong Hongyuan away.
During the game, something happened that caused an uproar: Xu Jie, a foreign aid of the Guangdong team, stepped on Wang Ruheng, a foreign aid of the Jilin team, when defending, causing the latter to fall and be injured.
The referee sentenced Xu Jie for a physical foul, and the head coach of the Jilin team, Wang Hanchao, and the captain Zhang Biao expressed strong dissatisfaction with this, believing that Xu Jie's actions were deliberately hurting people, and asked the referee to give a more severe punishment.
The head coach of the Guangdong team, Du Feng, thought that Xu Jie's actions were unintentional and had no malice, and he also scolded the generals of the Jilin team on the sidelines.
The game's on-site commentator also remained silent on the incident and did not give his own opinion.
This incident has sparked heated discussions among fans and the media, some people think that Xu Jie's actions are against sportsmanship, some people think that Xu Jie's actions are unintentional, some people think that the referee's punishment is reasonable, some people think that the referee's punishment is unfair, some people think that Du Feng's attitude is arrogant, some people think that Du Feng's attitude is just, some people think that the protest of the Jilin team is rational, and some think that the protest of the Jilin team is emotional.
Various opinions and voices are intertwined, forming a storm of public opinion about the foreign aid stepping incident.
So, is it a violation of the body of foreign aid? How should the CBA regulate the behavior of foreign aid? These questions deserve our in-depth consideration and discussion.
First of all, we need to be clear about what a physical foul is.
According to CBA league rules, a physical foul is when a player deliberately or excessively uses physical contact during a game to interfere with the opponent's normal movement and cause disadvantage or danger to the opponent.
The penalty criteria for physical fouls are determined based on the purpose, intensity, consequences and impact of the player's actions.
Generally speaking, there are two types of physical violations: ordinary and technical violations, the punishment for ordinary violations is two free throws and one throw by the opponent, and the punishment for technical violations is two free throws and one throw for the opponent, and the technical violations will also be counted in the player's personal fouls and cumulative technical fouls.
Players who accumulate a certain number of technical fouls in a season are also subject to a suspension.
Secondly, we need to analyze whether Xu Jie's foot-stepping action constitutes a physical foul.
It can be seen from the video replay that when Xu Jie was defending Wang Ruheng, he first pulled Wang Ruheng's arm with his hand, and then when Wang Ruheng jumped, he stretched forward with his left foot and paddled Wang Ruheng's right foot, causing Wang Ruheng to lose his balance when he landed, fell to the ground, and sprained his right ankle.
Xu Jie's actions were obviously deliberate, and the intensity was not small, and the consequences were also very serious, affecting Wang Ruheng's normal actions and causing Wang Ruheng's disadvantage and danger.
Therefore, Xu Jie's actions fully met the definition of a physical foul, and the referee was correct in awarding Xu Jie a physical foul.
Third, we are going to explore whether Xu Jie's foot-stepping action should be judged as a technical physical foul.
A technical foul is when a player deliberately or excessively uses physical contact during a game that interferes with the normal movement of the opponent, causes disadvantage or danger to the opponent, and is characterized by obvious malice or violence.
The penalty criteria for technical fouls are determined based on the purpose, intensity, consequences and impact of the player's actions, taking into account whether the player's actions are contrary to the principles of sportsmanship and fair play.
Generally speaking, technical fouls are divided into two types: ordinary technical violations and bad technical violations, the punishment for ordinary technical violations is two free throws and one throw plus the ball by the opponent, and the punishment for bad technical violations is two free throws and one throw plus the ball by the opponent, and the player will be expelled from the game, and even be further punished by the league.
So, does Xu Jie's foot-stepping action have obvious malicious or violent characteristics? This question is more subjective, and different people may have different opinions.
Some people believe that Xu Jie's foot-stepping action is deliberately hurtful, an extremely despicable and vicious act, a serious violation of the personal safety of the opponent, a serious violation of sportsmanship and fair play, and should be judged as a bad technical foul, and should even be banned.
Some people think that Xu Jie's stepping action is an unintentional mistake, an unconscious instinctive reaction, a way to defend the opponent normally, and a reflection of the intensity of the game, which should not be judged as a technical physical foul, just an ordinary physical foul is enough.
There are also people who believe that Xu Jie's stepping action is intentional, but not malicious, it is an unscrupulous behavior in order to win, a means of psychological tactics for the opponent, and a manifestation of a tactical choice of the game, which should be judged as an ordinary technical foul, but not to be expelled from the game or banned.
#文章首发挑战赛#