"Joint sitting" refers to the joint punishment of persons (such as relatives, neighbors, colleagues, etc.) who have a certain relationship (such as relatives, neighbors, colleagues, etc.) because one person commits a crime. This practice has its roots in ancient forms of punishment, but its rationality and fairness have been debated in modern society. Recently, the Legislative Affairs Committee of the National People's Congress stopped the "joint sitting", close relatives cannot be punished, and the common sense of the constitution must be defended, this decision has aroused heated discussions among netizens.
Some netizens believe that it is reasonable not to punish close relatives because everyone should be responsible for their own actions and cannot be punished for the criminal behavior of family members. At the same time, they argued that although close relatives cannot be punished, it is only fair to ensure that his close relatives do not receive any illegal benefits from his illegal and criminal acts. It is unfair to the victim if the victim's interests are compromised or even in distress, while the offender's family members benefit from it.
Another part of netizens believes that the perpetrator has been punished and cannot affect his family. They applauded the decision of the Legislative Affairs Commission and resolutely supported the decision of the National People's Congress. They believe that the purpose of punishing the offender is to make him realize his mistakes and correct his behavior, not to punish his family.
There are also some netizens who believe that although they cannot sit together, they must be severely punished for crimes, especially corrupt elements, and they must not miss all their corruption. They believe that the family of the offender should not be allowed to benefit from it, and that he should not be able to shadow his wife and children. If a close relative is the actual beneficiary of the proceeds of crime and uses the proceeds of the crime of his close relatives for consumption, should he be found to be an accomplice?
Regarding the issue of "joint sitting", netizens have their own opinions. However, no matter which point of view, it reflects everyone's expectation of legal justice and fairness. The law is the guarantee of social justice, and we hope that the law can better protect everyone's rights and interests and make society fairer and more just. #Article Launch Challenge#