[Tweet Text]
The story behind the high-level phone call between the Chinese and US militaries! Why did the four-star general of the US military call? What kind of signals did the two warnings issued by the Chinese side trigger? The answers you want to know are here!
On December 21, the Ministry of National Defense reported that Liu Zhenli, chief of staff of the Joint Staff Department of the Central Military Commission, had a video call with Brown, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff of the United States Military Commission. What's behind this scene? Let's find out.
First of all, this phone call was not ordinary! The four-star general of the US military took the initiative to call, and the Chinese side finally answered. Unlike in the past, the call was unusually tense, and the Chinese side issued two warnings in succession, sending a strong signal. What's going on?
Since taking office, Brown has been trying to establish communication with the Chinese military, but what are the reasons for taking the initiative to make the phone call again? Why did the Chinese side choose this moment to make a video call? What are the hidden motives behind the high-level dialogue being held again after a year?
Surprisingly, however, the call did not make substantial progress, but instead issued a stern warning. On the Taiwan issue and territorial sovereignty in the South China Sea, the Chinese side stressed during the phone call that it should safeguard national sovereignty and territorial integrity and have zero tolerance for foreign interference. The U.S. side mentioned managing competition responsibly, avoiding miscalculations, and maintaining direct communication. But the Chinese side does not seem to be satisfied with Brown's response, because the Ministry of Defense source rarely only writes about China's statement, but does not mention Brown's response.
The U.S. and China are increasingly competing in the Indo-Pacific region. During the call, Brown mentioned that the two sides should manage competition responsibly, but the Chinese side made it clear that it is necessary to follow the important consensus of the San Francisco meeting and adhere to exchanges and cooperation on the basis of equality and respect. Does this mean that the U.S. military's military strategy in the Indo-Pacific region needs to be rethought?
Recent U.S. military moves in the Indo-Pacific region have attracted great attention, including P-8A patrol aircraft flying over the Taiwan Strait and supporting the Philippines' provocations in the South China Sea. Does China's warning mean that China will respond more resolutely to U.S. provocations?
In addition, the U.S. side mentioned that the two sides should hold bilateral defense policy coordination talks, maritime military security consultation mechanism talks, and open communication channels between the U.S. Indo-Pacific Command and the commanders of the Eastern and Southern Theaters of the People's Liberation Army as soon as possible. Does this signal that there may be more high-level dialogue between China and the United States, or is it just a superficial affair?
All this makes people wonder where the competition and cooperation between China and the United States are headed, and we will continue to pay attention to and dig deep into the stories behind the inextricable links in the international situation.
Don't miss the latest military developments, follow our account, and keep up with the world about the international military situation!
#中美通话 #军事动态 #国际关系 #中美竞争 #军事战略
[Tweet Text]
Interpretation of the high-level phone call between China and the United States! Why did the four-star general of the US military suddenly call? The hidden secrets behind China's two warnings were revealed!
On 21 December, a wave was set off in military circles, and Liu Zhenli, member of the Central Military Commission and chief of staff of the Joint Staff Department of the Central Military Commission, had a video call with Brown Brown, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff of the US military. What is the unusual inside story behind a phone call? Let's dig deeper.
First of all, US four-star General Brown took the initiative to make a phone call, and the Chinese side finally got through; what was the reason for this unexpected dialogue? Brown has been trying to communicate with the Chinese military, but what does it mean for the Chinese side to choose to accept the agreement this time? What are the ulterior motives behind the high-level dialogue?
However, the call did not lead to substantial progress, and instead the Chinese side issued two warnings. On the Taiwan issue and territorial sovereignty in the South China Sea, China stresses that national sovereignty brooks no foreign interference and zero tolerance for external interference. The U.S. side mentioned that it should manage competition responsibly and maintain open and direct communication. However, the Chinese side did not seem to be satisfied with Brown's response, and the Ministry of Defense news rarely wrote only the Chinese side's statement, but did not mention Brown's response. Does this mean that China is dissatisfied with the United States?
What is the position of the two sides on the phone call as the U.S.-China rivalry in the Indo-Pacific region intensifies? Brown mentioned that competition should be managed responsibly, but China insists on exchanges and cooperation based on equality and respect. Does this mean that the U.S. military's military strategy in the Indo-Pacific region needs to be rethought?
Recent U.S. military moves in the Indo-Pacific region have attracted great attention, including the flight of P-8A patrol aircraft over the Taiwan Strait and support for Philippine provocations in the South China Sea. Does China's warning indicate that China will respond more resolutely to U.S. provocations?
In addition, the U.S. side mentioned that the two sides should hold bilateral defense policy coordination talks, maritime military security consultation mechanism talks, and open communication channels between the U.S. Indo-Pacific Command and the commanders of the Eastern and Southern Theaters of the People's Liberation Army as soon as possible. Does this mean that there will be more high-level dialogue between China and the United States, or is it just a superficial affair?
All this has caused people to ponder deeply, where is the competition and cooperation between China and the United States going? In the inextricable international situation, we will continue to pay attention to and dig deep into the stories behind them.
Don't miss out on more military news! Follow our account to bring you the latest international military news!
#中美通话 #军事解读 #国际政局 #印太地区 #军事战略