I didn't have the money to return the compensation to the victim, but I had the money to find someone to help reduce the sentence of the fraudster's son, but the result was that the family didn't enter the door and was deceived by the fraudster of 300,000 yuan, which is also too funny.
This is a true story, a young man named Li in Beijing was arrested for defrauding more than 30 yuan. In the process of handling the case, the judge contacted Li's mother, "Mrs. Tian", hoping that she could return the victim.
However, Mrs. Tian only agreed to return 9,000 yuan. Surprisingly, despite claiming that there was no money to return the victim, Mrs. Tian was defrauded of 300,000 yuan, and in the process of trying to find someone to help reduce the sentence, she met He, who was later sentenced to 10 and a half years in prison for fraud, which was longer than the sentence of Mrs. Tian's son.
Later, after the incident was reported by the media, it attracted widespread attention and discussion on the Internet. Many people expressed their incomprehension of Mrs. Tian's behavior of only being willing to return 9,000 yuan, and at the same time felt sorry for her final deception, and even felt a little inexplicably funny, maybe this is karma.
In this regard, Nian Han took a look at the comments of netizens and felt that this matter was so outrageous that I am afraid that I would not even dare to shoot a TV series like this.
For example, the following netizen from Sichuan analyzed: "It is equivalent to the 300,000 people who turned around and went in." ”
and this netizen from Tianjin praised: "The old lady is amazing, she sent two fraudsters in one hand." ”
And the following netizen from Henan played a tongue twister: "The scammer deceived 300,000, and the scammer deceived another 300,000." ”
Nian Han said that my opinion on this incident actually reflects the complex relationship between legal and moral responsibility in contemporary society. On the one hand, Li's criminal behavior needs to be punished in accordance with the law, and at the same time, the victim's losses should also be reasonably compensated.
On the other hand, Mrs. Tian, as a parent, seemed helpless and contradictory in the face of her son's mistakes. Her actions, while criticized, also exposed society's complex attitudes towards family responsibilities and moral norms.
In addition to this, this incident also touched on the multi-layered issues of family education, social morality and legal responsibility. For example, the family plays an important role in nurturing children's moral and legal awareness.
However, when family members are involved in crimes, the legal and moral responsibilities of parents also become the focus of social attention. And Mrs. Tian eventually became a victim of fraud, which also reflects the problem of fraud in society and the lack of public awareness of anti-fraud.
So how should we balance legal responsibility with family morality? How should we strengthen family education and raise the public's awareness of the law? These questions deserve our deep consideration in this incident. At the same time, Nian Han believes that the protection of the elderly and the crackdown on fraud crimes need to be further strengthened.