#文章首发挑战赛#
The local official apologized: it said that the person in charge of the enterprise had been interviewed. In the face of media reports on the problems of snow removal and transportation, they welcomed and thanked them! There were many suggestions and outspoken criticisms, which were welcomed, and they would listen carefully and discover problems.
And only after the reflection was reviewed, it was pointed out that the mechanized snow removal equipment of Benxi Company, which was responsible for the supply and marketing environment of snow removal, was not fully in place.
In response to the long-term continuous snowfall is not well prepared, some trunk roads are not thorough snow removal, streets and alleys are not timely, and the supervision of functional departments is not in place, which has brought many inconveniences to the lives of citizens. Rely on the feedback of the masses to improve, if the problem is not found in time to deal with, then how to deal with the irresponsibility of the functional departments?
It can be learned from the media that snow removal is outsourced.
It is called Supply and Marketing Environmental Technology Co., Ltd., which is a subsidiary of China Supply and Marketing Group. A total of 2.83 billion yuan was spent, and the first time it was signed for 24 years, spending 118 million yuan per year.
So how is this snow swept away?
1. The person in charge of the enterprise has been interviewed, and the enterprise is required to quickly complete the machinery and equipment.
2. Dispatch special personnel to go deep into the front line to supervise and guide.
3. Mobilize volunteers to clear snow together and launch a nationwide action to resist extreme weather.
Doubts have been raised about these points
The first point is that enterprises with insufficient equipment and personnel can also bid successfully?
The second point is that it didn't appear until everyone paid attention, is this because the relevant responsible officers are not held accountable at all?
The third point is that it is all outsourced, and it is necessary to mobilize a large number of volunteers, is this price reasonable?
In terms of benefit calculation, after the implementation of this reform, the mechanized cleaning rate of all roads will be gradually improved, which can save 7 million yuan per year.
Saving 7 million does sound like a lot, but compared to 118 million, it is 1.18:0.07, which is actually not much, not to mention that it has not been removed. In previous years, the snow removal masses were fine, and the mechanization of the docking was less complete than in the past, what is the significance of this saving.
Let the volunteers help and send the 2.8 billion to the volunteers, so that they can be cleaned up without so much equipment, do you support it?