laitimes

"Engaged and raped" was sentenced to three years Public opinion was one-sided, and the presiding judge announced the details to reverse the case

author:Little Shadow Emotional Station
"Engaged and raped" was sentenced to three years Public opinion was one-sided, and the presiding judge announced the details to reverse the case

I believe that today everyone must have been sentenced to three years by the parties to the "engagement rape case" in Datong, Shanxi, and they have been swiped. Public opinion is one-sided, based on the words of the man's parents alone, many netizens were led to the rhythm of the man's grievances, thinking that the court's sentence was too serious, that the woman was too materialistic, and some even thought of the Datong engagement murder case three years ago!

What are the details of the case? That night, the presiding judge of the court gave an interview to the interface express and revealed the details of the case!

Let's first review the whole incident of the case:

In January 2023, the man Xi and the woman were introduced to each other by a marriage agency, and after 4 months of dating, when the two came to talk about marriage, the man orally agreed to give the woman a bride price of 188,000 yuan.

"Engaged and raped" was sentenced to three years Public opinion was one-sided, and the presiding judge announced the details to reverse the case

On May 1st, the two held an engagement ceremony! The man gave the woman a 100,000 bride price and bought a 7.2g wedding ring!

"Engaged and raped" was sentenced to three years Public opinion was one-sided, and the presiding judge announced the details to reverse the case

The man's parents also gave a written agreement and promised that one year after the two got married, the woman's name would be added to the real estate certificate, and then another 100,000 bride price would be given. Both parties reached an agreement, and the man's parents also signed the agreement!

"Engaged and raped" was sentenced to three years Public opinion was one-sided, and the presiding judge announced the details to reverse the case

On May 2, according to local Xi, the woman invited the man's family to dinner to thank her! After the meal, the woman and the man returned to the marriage room for the night! The key dispute came out, the man's parents said that the girl took a bath in the house, and the two voluntarily had a relationship, and afterwards the woman asked to immediately take the real estate certificate to add her name and the remaining 100,000 dowry! Because the man did not immediately agree to the woman's request, he went to the police station that night to report that he had been raped!

Because the court did not disclose the details of the case to the public in a timely manner, relying only on the words of the man's parents, and the woman did not respond in a timely manner, the online public opinion was one-sided, accusing the woman of material, and even holding grievances against the man, thinking that it was too worthless to be sentenced to three years for being slandered and raped in engagement, and hoped that the case could be reversed and the verdict changed!

In the evening, the presiding judge of the court accepted an exclusive interview with the interface newsletter to reveal the details of the case!

That night, when the two were in the marital room, the man proposed to have sex, but the woman refused, and then the man forcibly wanted to have sex, and the two sides tore up! The woman was emotional and wanted to light the cabinets and curtains in the room. The woman fled from the 14th floor of the marriage room to the 13th floor at that time, but was dragged back by the man to commit violence.

After receiving the police, the police also examined the victim's woman's body, and found bruises on the woman's thighs, arms, and wrists! Based on the above evidence, it is enough to conclude that the man had forcibly had a relationship against the woman's will!

Although they are "engaged", they are not legally married without a license

The presiding judge also responded to this, although the two parties are engaged, but they have not obtained a license, and the woman has no responsibility to fulfill her marital obligations! In this regard, netizens have left a message saying that even if they are legally married with a certificate, and the wife does not agree to have a relationship, she can also sue for rape!

Once again, I call on everyone to believe in the official, not to be easily led astray by the Internet, and believe that justice will not wronged a good person, nor will it let go of a bad person!

As for the man's statement in court that he would appeal, do you think the judgment will be changed in the second instance, or will the original judgment be upheld?

What do you think about this?Welcome to leave a message, looking forward to your attention! Follow me @Xiaoying Emotional Station

#2023 Creation Challenge##Marriage Story Sharing##Article Launch Challenge#