Hikiko
The United Nations decided to make the Spring Festival a holiday, but the country is facing the embarrassing situation of not having a holiday on Chinese New Year's Eve. This decision has caused people to express their dissatisfaction, including the well-known singer Huang An. Let's take a closer look at this controversy and explore whether the decisions of experts are really detached from the needs of ordinary people.
Worries about traditional Xi customs: Chinese New Year's Eve becomes a deserted night
The traditional Chinese New Year's Eve has always been one of the most important days for Chinese. Families reunite to spend the New Year together, and traditional Xi such as sticking to the Spring Festival and keeping the New Year are particularly important. However, in this year's Spring Festival arrangement, Chinese New Year's Eve was not given the treatment of a holiday. This decision upset many because, in their opinion, it meant not being able to truly experience family reunions and the traditional festive atmosphere.
The rarity of not having a holiday on Chinese New Year's Eve makes this decision even more compelling. What was supposed to be a time for family reunion has become a lonely night. With the acceleration of urbanization and the acceleration of the pace of life, people's already rare time together is even more precious. And now, even this brief moment has been taken away, raising more doubts about expert decision-making.
Traffic pain: traffic jams have become the theme of the Spring Festival holiday
The holiday highway is full of traffic jams, and the family reunion time is short, this problem has long been a common trouble during the Spring Festival. Out-of-towners often have to choose to go back to their hometown on the morning of the first day of the new year, but due to the congestion of the expressway, many people cannot actually get home until the second day of the new year. In order to avoid congestion, many people choose to return on the third and fourth days of the new year, resulting in a short time to reunite with their families, and it is too tiring to travel back and forth.
Experts seem to ignore the issue, filling up the Lunar New Year holiday with a lot of time to ignore the family time that people really need. Traffic jams have become the theme of the Spring Festival holiday, and people spend most of the holiday on the go. This situation raises questions about whether experts really understand the lives and needs of ordinary people.
Yang Kaisheng expert proposed a ban on fireworks
The debate over expert decision-making: detachment from the masses provokes public outrage
Experts are high, detached from the masses, do not respect traditions, and do not know the needs of the common people, so they deserve to be exposed. Huang An sharply criticized the experts on Weibo, which attracted widespread attention. He represented the voice of the majority, expressing dissatisfaction and anger at the decisions of experts.
The incident sparked widespread discussion in society, with many people expressing doubts about the experts' decision-making. What are the considerations for the experts' decision-making? Are they really ignorant of the actual needs of the people, or are they deliberately ignoring these needs? This series of questions has triggered a profound reflection on the experts' decision-making and has also prompted more people to pay attention to the social system.
Is the expert role overly idealized?
Is the role of experts overly idealized? Are experts really making decisions for the sake of the common people? Or are they more in pursuit of an ideal order and law, and put the needs of the individual secondary?
Many people are beginning to reflect on whether expert decision-making should be more democratic, and whether the voices of ordinary people should be listened to more. This incident has made people re-examine the status of experts in society, and the responsibilities they should bear. It's time to rethink the relationship between experts and the public, and how to better take into account the real needs of the population at large in decision-making.
Do we really understand the bottom line of expert decision-making?
In this controversy, we have seen the dissatisfaction and doubts of the common people with the decision-making of experts. However, do we really understand the bottom line of expert decision-making, and what factors do experts take into account when making decisions?
Perhaps, we need to have a deeper understanding of how experts work and the pressures and considerations they face in their decision-making. This controversy is not only a question of the expert's decision-making, but also a process of our understanding of the expert's decision-making. We should not stop at superficial criticism and dissatisfaction, but should have a deeper understanding of the responsibilities and challenges of experts. Perhaps, by establishing a more open and transparent decision-making mechanism, communication between experts and the public will be smoother.
In this era of information explosion, we need to look at expert decision-making more rationally and objectively. At the same time, experts need to pay more attention to the diverse voices of society and pay more attention to the actual feelings of the people. Only in this way can we build a more harmonious and inclusive society, where expert decision-making truly meets people's expectations. While discussing the controversy, perhaps we should ask ourselves: how much do we know about expert decision-making, and are we willing to contribute our wisdom and strength to better decision-making?
(The material of the article comes from the Internet)