Title: Hot discussion on the Internet: "borrowing" or "plagiarizing" Korean culture?
Introduction: Hello everyone, today let's talk about a topic that has caused a lot of turmoil on the Internet -- is Korean culture "borrowing" the essence of other countries, or is it directly "plagiarizing"? From clothing to food, from history to modern fashion, this debate can be described as full of gunpowder! Let's take a look at how keyboard warriors from all walks of life fight!
Hey~ The first sister is really convinced, and the controversy on the Internet has been getting more and more fierce recently! Do you know what I'm talking about? It's about whether our dear Korean culture is plagiarized from other people's homes. I'm telling you, there's a lot of excitement about it.
First of all, I have to talk about the voices of our own Koreans. Some netizens said: "Where did we plagiarize? It's obviously a cultural exchange between each other!" They think that there should be some reference and integration between cultures, after all, wouldn't it be good to let more good things pass on?
But then again, there are also some bottomless voices, "I really feel sorry for you", they feel that some of the so-called 'innovation' in modern times is actually not firmly rooted, and they are too glamorous in pursuit of the superficial and ignore the profound connotation.
Then, foreign friends were not idle. Someone in Indonesia jumped out and said, "Haha, your 'Hanfu' obviously looks quite similar to our traditional clothing." I think it may also reflect some anxiety about cultural identity and preservation.
There are also voices from the United States, "Korean beauty is really hot, but do you think you have created the original BB cream? Don't forget that the first skin repair cream was invented by us Germans." Listening to this, I thought to myself, yes, innovation is important, but respect for originality must not be lost.
About the ancestors of Goguryeo, there is a lot of noise on the Internet. On the one hand, there are those who insist that Goguryeo is an integral part of the history of the Korean nation, and on the other hand, there is an argument that this argument ignores historical facts and complexities. Historical issues always provoke the deepest emotional antagonism in people's hearts.
And when it comes to the creation of cosmetics culture in modern Korea, it is really admirable. But it also hints at a sensitive topic – the struggle to flaunt certain elements as a source of national pride in modern society, perhaps because of poverty or low physical self-esteem in the past. In this way, it seems reasonable to have a global dispute over cultural ownership and belonging.
In short, friends, on the Internet, everyone's debate on "borrowing" or "plagiarism" is intensifying. Through the-for-tat, rational or excited exchange of opinions among netizens, a small battlefield has been formed online. Each brings their own unique perspective to articulate and defend their own understanding of cultural heritage and identity.
As for who is right and who is wrong in the end? I am afraid that there is no simple and clear answer. After all, the ultimate goal is to promote cultural diversity and global inclusion, isn't it? I just hope that in the future we can all be more tolerant, respectful of each other, and with an open mind to appreciate the colors that each culture brings to the world!
Okay, okay~ That's all for this topic today!What do you think?Welcome to leave a message to discuss~Don't forget to like and follow!See you next time~