The content of this article comes from the Internet, if it is inconsistent with the actual situation or there is infringement, please contact to delete.
In recent days, the state-owned enterprise "hand-in-hand" incident itself has been fermenting, which has triggered more thinking. We don't eat melons today, let's talk about something completely different from another angle.
Will the "hand-in-hand door" become a typical event that changes the course of history? We'll see.
State-owned enterprises "hand in hand", is there any corruption in this? We still need to wait for the results of the investigation. Judging from the various signs that have been exposed so far, I am afraid that things here are not simple, and if there is really something, it will not be small.
Judging from the current information, if the "hand-holding door" involves corruption, it will be at least tens of millions, because judging from the few words revealed by Miss Dong on social media, the property involved is no less than tens of millions.
As we all know, in the past 10 years, the fight against corruption has always been a very important topic for us, and the intensity of the crackdown has also been very strong.
In fact, there has been a long history of controversy over the sentencing of corruption, and there have been a large number of research papers and related articles in the legal community over the years, and there are many such controversies not only in the legal community, but also at the legislative and administrative levels.
Although we have made great efforts to fight corruption, the problem of corruption is still emerging one after another. Some people have said, is it not enough to deter corruption and sentencing, so there are always people who have a fluke mentality and repeatedly take risks?
Can "hand-in-hand door" be a typical event?
To sum up, the controversy over the sentencing of corruption is mainly due to the fact that many people have called for heavier sentences to increase the deterrence of corrupt elements.
This starts with how our country's laws punish corruption.
In addition to what we mentioned earlier, death is not the most terrible for corrupt elements, there is another important problem, in the past, some corrupt elements hoped that they would die, in exchange for the relevant people involved in the case or their family members to escape, which is very unfair.
Opponents argue that the most important thing in the law is fairness and justice, and that excessive sentencing is not in line with the basic spirit of the law.
So, how, exactly? We can still use the example of "holding hands with the door" to explore.
Let's take Hand in Hand Gate as an example, if the amount of corruption involved exceeds 3 million, exile for 1,000 miles; more than 10 million, exiled for 2,000 miles; More than 30 million, exiled for 3,000 miles, and never commuted or pardoned.
Those who hold this view believe that corrupt people are a special group of people who are usually extremely greedy and enjoy a life of extreme luxury. Therefore, for them, the most terrible thing is not to die, but to stay away from the stage of power, lose the high position brought by power and the pleasure of controlling the fate of others, lose all the enjoyment of life, participate in labor in remote areas, accept transformation, and spend the rest of their lives in poverty and bitterness. This is a very targeted punishment, a bit of "murder and heart-punishing", and a bit like the "exile of three thousand miles" in the past. For corrupt elements, the taste of punishment is indeed the most terrible.
Can the "hand-in-hand door" become a typical event that changes the course of history? We'll see.
In addition, such a punishment can also be supplemented by educational reform similar to "reflection and repentance", in which the prisoner should reflect on his sins, write a memoir, and warn the world to learn from himself.
In fact, the current criminal law of the mainland does not impose a low sentence on corruption, for example, if the bribe exceeds 3 million yuan, it will be determined that the "amount is particularly huge", and the sentencing is more than 10 years in prison, life imprisonment or even the death penalty.
Is there any truth to this view?
In spite of this, corruption has persisted despite repeated prohibitions, and in particular, there are quite a few "petty officials who are hugely corrupt," and the overall anti-corruption situation is still grim.
Will the "hand-in-hand door" become a typical event that changes the course of history?
Is there any truth to this view?
We consulted with legal experts, and the answer was very unexpected.
We see that the two people involved have been suspended for investigation, this is just the beginning, if the follow-up investigation is confirmed, what kind of outcome will the two people face?
The most typical of these is that a few years ago, the secretary of a municipal party committee surnamed Zhao made a suggestion that corruption should be exceeded
500,000 will be sentenced to death, only in this way can corruption be curbed. It was a bold suggestion, but unfortunately it was not adopted.
Although some people have called for heavier sentences, some people in legal circles have questioned whether harsh punishments can really deter corrupt elements. They believe that corrupt elements breed under power and pursue power and interests, not life and death. Therefore, the death penalty is not necessarily the most terrible for them, but even more terrible is the loss of power, deprivation of all the enjoyments of life, forced to work in remote areas, and undergo ideological transformation.
This view may be worth pondering. Taking the "hand-in-hand door" as an example, if the amount of money involved in the corruption case reaches a certain standard, the punishment of exile can not only achieve the goal of heavier punishment, but also avoid the controversy of excessive punishment. In addition, the penal sentence of exile also contributes to the continuous ideological transformation of corrupt elements and reduces the chances of those involved in the case evading legal punishment.
The problem of corruption is a serious social problem that requires profound reflection and discussion. In exploring solutions, we need to look at the existing legal and penal systems from different perspectives. So let's wait and see if the hand-in-hand door will become a classic event that changes the course of history and triggers more discussion and reform on corruption.
Revelation:
Recently, the "hand-in-hand" incident of state-owned enterprises has aroused widespread attention and thinking. The most important question is whether there is corruption and how to punish it more effectively. From this event, we can draw some revelations and perspectives:
Persistence: Despite the Chinese government's ongoing efforts to combat corruption, corruption continues to emerge. This shows that harsh penalties alone cannot completely eradicate corruption, and that in-depth reform and monitoring mechanisms are needed.
Legal controversy: Sentencing for corruption has been controversial, with some arguing for heavier penalties to increase deterrence, while others argue that the law should maintain fairness and justice and avoid excessive punishment.
More than the death penalty: Some legal experts have put forward the idea of abolishing the death penalty, the maximum penalty, arguing that what is more terrible for corrupt elements is the loss of power and status and the acceptance of reform and punishment.
Exile as an alternative: One proposed alternative is to replace the death penalty with exile, which not only serves the purpose of heavier punishments, but also aids in ideological reform and education.
Summary:
The "hand-in-hand" incident of state-owned enterprises has triggered deep thinking about corruption and criminal punishment. Although the anti-corruption efforts have been considerable, the problem of corruption is still serious. At the heart of the controversy is whether the penalties are sufficiently harsh or whether more targeted measures should be taken to punish the corrupt.
Some advocate greater punishment, but opponents argue that the law should remain fair and just and not excessive. In addition, some legal experts have proposed abolishing the death penalty and using exile as an alternative punishment to deter corrupt elements away from power and status.
Whatever measures are taken, we look forward to more reforms and oversight mechanisms to eradicate corruption and ensure social equity and justice. The SOE "hand-in-hand" incident may be a typical event that changes the course of history, but we need to continue to monitor the results of the investigation and the progress of related legal reforms.
Continuing to delve into the "hand-in-hand" incident and the problem of corruption in state-owned enterprises, we can consider the following aspects:
Purpose and Effect of Penal Punishment: Corruption is a cancer in society that undermines fairness, justice and social harmony. The purpose of penal punishment is not only to punish criminals, but more importantly, to prevent crime, deter potential offenders, and restore fairness and justice in society. Therefore, the punishment should take into account a combination of these factors.
Punishment and Ideological Reform: In addition to severe punishment, ideological reform is also an important part. Corrupt people often have a strong greed and lust for power, so depriving them of power and status may be a more deterrent than the death penalty. Ideological transformation can help them recognize their mistakes and alert themselves and others so that they do not fall into the abyss of corruption again.
Rule of Law and Supervision: Greater emphasis on the rule of law and the construction of oversight systems is essential. Only a strong legal system and an effective supervisory mechanism can truly prevent the occurrence of corruption. The SOE "hand-in-hand" incident has also highlighted the problem of ineffective supervision, which needs to be further improved and strengthened.
Public participation: Public oversight and participation are also essential in the fight against corruption. Public opinion and public scrutiny can push the government to take more proactive measures to ensure that corruption is effectively addressed.
International experience: We can learn from the experience of other countries to understand the effects of different penal systems and methods of ideological reform. Countries around the world have a wealth of experience in the fight against corruption that can help us better meet this challenge.
In general, the "hand-in-hand" incident of state-owned enterprises has triggered deep thinking about the problem of corruption. Addressing this problem requires a comprehensive approach, including severe penalties, ideological reform, rule of law, oversight mechanisms and public participation. We expect the Government and society to work together to eradicate corruption and ensure fairness and justice in society. Whether the SOE "hand-in-hand" incident will become a typical incident depends on the depth of our actions and reforms. This is an issue that cannot be ignored, and it is also a major issue that has a bearing on social stability and progress. We should remain vigilant, actively participate in the fight against corruption, and contribute our strength to the cause of corruption.
The above content information is from the Internet, relevant data, and theoretical research on the Internet information, which does not mean that the author of this article agrees with the laws, rules, opinions, behaviors in the article and is responsible for the authenticity of the relevant information. The author of this article does not assume any direct or indirect legal responsibility for any of the above or related issues.