Recently, I read the proposal article of the research group of the National Academy of Administration on the reform of administrative divisions, and here I would like to express my suggestions on the reform of administrative divisions, as well as the discussion of the suggestions of experts.
The research group of the National Academy of Administration on "narrowing the scope of provincial management, increasing the number of provincial-level administrative regions, and annexing prefecture-level cities to reduce their number" to simplify the research of institutions may be meaningful, for example, institutional reform is to simplify or compress the management level for the purpose of improving management efficiency and reducing management costs. However, the study ignores that the current function of the provincial level is to emphasize control and light management, that is, it does not have the function of directly managing economic development, it is still the office of the State Council at the local level, which is a bureaucratic body, so it is better to reduce the provincial level than to abolish the provincial level, completely destroy the institution, merge the prefecture-level cities into larger cities (several prefecture-level cities are split and reorganized) to replace the provincial functions, and do not lose the original prefecture-level cities to directly manage economic development functions and strengthen this function, and at the same time cancel the original prefecture-level cities and county-level cities. As well as the sub-district offices and township levels, the district manages the community, and the county manages the newly formed relatively large village-level committees (agriculture, rural areas, farmers). At the same time, the work of agriculture, agriculture and agriculture is managed by the county level, and the districts and counties are only responsible for other social management functions in addition to the departments of industry and commerce and public security, procuratorate and justice. It is uniformly supported by the municipal treasury.
It is important to note here that the functions of the newly formed and replaced provinces of large cities are:
1. It is very important to directly accept the central management, and the current technology and hardware conditions can fully support the central government to manage about 200 local governments (administrative regions). The central government is basically inconvenient, except that the number of local administrative regions has increased from 35 to more than 200 after the reorganization, and the management methods and functions remain unchanged.
2. The key work is to be responsible for local economic development, financial and tax management, and to support all management departments in the city.
3. All the original management functions are retained.
4. In addition to the work of agriculture, agriculture and agriculture, economic work and business administration work are directly carried out to the end and are fully responsible, and districts and counties do not undertake economic work responsibilities.
5. The Public Procuratorate and Justice Department only has a dispatched agency or service hall window service for the district and county. There is no public procuratorate and judicial department at the district and county level.
At present, there are 35 provincial-level administrative regions (autonomous regions, municipalities directly under the Central Government, special administrative regions, and Taiwan regions), 333 prefecture-level cities (prefectures, leagues), 2,844 counties (county-level cities, etc.), and 38,741 township-level cities. Collectively referred to as provinces, counties, and townships.
Taiwan, Hong Kong and Macao, as well as Tibet, Qinghai, Xinjiang and Ningxia are not involved in the reform in special circumstances.
Beijing, Shanghai, Tianjin, and Chongqing have been administered as municipalities directly under the central government, and the original city level has been retained, but internal reforms and other reforms have been carried out simultaneously, except that the city level has strengthened the function of direct economic management, and the economic management function of lower-level districts and counties has been abolished.
The remaining 24 provinces will be abolished, including prefecture-level cities, county-level cities, and townships, and district, county, community, and village-level committees will be reorganized (the current rural contract production mechanism is feasible to merge more into large villages).
Guiding ideology of reorganization:
1. It is conducive to social management, especially social safety management.
2. It is conducive to regional coordination or to improving land utilization.
3. Rural culture and customs are similar, and natural conditions are shared (rivers, lakes, reservoirs, mountains, transportation).
4. It is conducive to the sharing of social resources (hospitals, schools, business districts, stations, and road networks).
5. Conducive to future development.
The practical significance of the reorganization of large cities and the abolition of provincial, prefecture-level cities, county-level cities, sub-district offices, and former township and township institutions:
1. About 200 large cities directly under the central government (165 administrative regions directly under the central government) have improved the efficiency of top-level work, and the State Council has been more direct in grasping the actual results, issuing information from the top to the bottom, with strong data reliability, faster and more direct, and more real and credible statistical data (big data).
The central policy is implemented in one step (the big city is the executor, not the original provincial communicator and the management function on behalf of the authority).
2. Big cities are the sole managers of the regional economy and the responsible persons for the end, and there is no link to shirk responsibility, and the responsibility system for economic management and development work should be strengthened.
3. Large cities are directly responsible for economic development, fiscal and tax payments, which are more conducive to the balanced development of the region, the advanced with the backward, the rich with the poor, 100% reflected in the city's financial management, with the system to restrain the balanced development of the regional economy, eliminate poor areas or dead ends, and there is no such thing as poverty alleviation.
4. Streamlining institutions, reducing financial burdens, and streamlining administration is to improve efficiency.
5. The abolition of economic work departments (industry and commerce, taxation, development and reform, statistics, auditing, finance, etc.) at the district and county level and below is to concretely reduce the number of institutions and devote oneself to social management.
6. Districts and counties abolish the grass-roots institutions of the Public Procuratorate and Justice Division, and those who need to be dispatched at the municipal level or the window service of the administrative office hall shall be set up downward.
Community police stations are directly managed by the Municipal Public Security Bureau, and there are no sub-bureaus in the district, so as to strengthen the functions of police stations.
Due to the special nature of the county, sub-bureaus can be set up, and the large village committees can also set up police stations.
In this way, the grassroots police force in society is more sufficient. It is more conducive to the management of public security.
7. Litigation and petitions are accepted by the window of the administrative office hall, and online services are gradually implemented, and it is feasible to complete lawsuits and complaints in the form of the Internet in terms of technical procedures (face recognition, human fingerprint technology).
8. There are fewer institutions, fewer levels, strengthened functions, and more specific responsibilities to each institution.
9. The application of modern office methods (powerful Internet and mobile phones), the widespread use of modern means of transportation (airplanes, high-speed railways, highways), fully support the reduction of management levels, not only will not affect the normal operation of society, but also promote the modernization of social management, will also improve national security, and will improve the happiness index of people's lives.
It is suggested that, after the above-mentioned institutional reform, the state may, in order to set up the functions of national defense management and the functions of the former high courts and high procuratorates, set up five major national defense management, high law, and high procuratorate regions in sync with the current division of theaters, and the five major regions in the east, west, south, south, and central regions will be called the Eastern High Court and the Eastern High Procuratorate. Eastern Garrison Management Committee... In this way, the number of high courts will be reduced, but the function will not be reduced. The top-level judicial system remains unchanged. It's just that the level is reduced and the lower courts are abolished. Perhaps the intermediate court will strengthen its establishment (there will be more functional court levels) and increase the workload, but it will not cause problems.
The above is just a discussion or suggestion from the people, not any other intention, and may affect other friends and articles, and I have no intention of refuting it, please understand.
Netizens are welcome to read and participate in the discussion, and I humbly accept the kind language. Don't spray [hug your fist], like and cheer! ✊