The content of this article comes from the Internet, if it is inconsistent with the actual situation or there is infringement, please contact to delete. This article is only published in today's headlines, please do not move.
Recently, the international situation has changed dramatically and disturbingly. In various tense international relations, North Korea's move set off a chain reaction. Behind the scenes, hidden the political calculations of the United States, Japan, South Korea and other countries, a complex political game is being staged. And China, as an important regional power, has been drawn into this crisis.
The DPRK first invited China and Russia to visit China and Russia in a high-profile manner, which aroused widespread concern in the international community. The move was interpreted as a threatening signal for countries such as the United States, as the history of the Korean War has not been forgotten and Russia's diplomatic relations with the United States continue to deteriorate. The United States, on the other hand, is impatiently moving around, trying to provoke conflicts on a global scale and push the international landscape into tension. It was at this moment that the United States, Japan, and South Korea jointly convened a meeting to launch a series of political actions.
The United States has struggled to contain China's rise, so it desperately needs to find a replacement, a new "Ukraine." This game continues to play out on the peninsula, the Taiwan Strait, the South China Sea and other regions, and the US war conspiracy is becoming more and more visible.
In the face of the military exercises of the United States, Japan, and South Korea, some experts pointed out: If China is involved in the conflict, Japan will mobilize more than 300,000 troops, South Korea can also mobilize 600,000 troops, the United States has 80,000 troops in Japan and South Korea, plus 300,000 troops in other regions, a total of 1.3 million troops can easily be assembled. However, this political situation is not simple.
There are deep historical grievances between Japan and South Korea, and there is no real friendly relationship between the two countries. Moreover, South Korea does not have the strength to engage in a military confrontation with China, after all, it has failed miserably on North Korea, let alone confronted China as a staunch negotiator.
In response to the situation, senior South Korean official Park Jin held an 80-minute telephone conversation with Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi. Although the specific content of the call was not disclosed, Wang Yi put forward three suggestions: first, China-South Korea relations need to get rid of the influence of third-party countries and maintain peaceful development; Second, South Korea needs to improve its military readiness to avoid blindly following the trend; Third, China supports the Republic of Korea in becoming the chair of China-Japan-ROK cooperation and actively promotes the establishment of effective communication between the three sides.
South Korea's positive response is cause for concern, but also for concern. After all, the United States is good at making "empty promises" and often reneges on its promises. The so-called news of 1.3 million enemy troops is only a red signal released by the United States to manipulate public opinion. It remains to be seen whether the United States, Japan, and South Korea will be bent on fighting and confronting China, North Korea, and Russia head-on when a conflict really breaks out. South Korea and Japan may end up being cannon fodder in the political game, while the United States reaps the benefits.
In this complex and ever-changing international situation, we can't help but ask, where will the future go? Only time and action will reveal this mystery.
The above content and materials are derived from the Internet, and the author of this article does not intend to target or allude to any real country, political system, organization, race, individual. The above does not mean that the author of this article endorses the laws, rules, opinions, behaviors in the article and is responsible for the authenticity of the relevant information. The author of this article is not responsible for any issues arising above or related to any of the above, nor does it assume any direct or indirect legal liability.