laitimes

The PLA built "caves" at the airport, 3 meters of concrete thick, and carried 1,000 pounds of guided bombs from the US military

author:Wisdom grape eKh

The content of this article comes from the Internet, if it is inconsistent with the actual situation or there is infringement, please contact to delete.

Building a "cave" on the airport sounds a bit incredible, but more and more stations of the PLA are doing this, even the backward J-8 fighters.

In the past, there were relatively few forts reinforced by the People's Air Force fighters, and most of the fighters were parked in the open air, or there were only simple hangars. Now the reinforced aircraft fort is becoming more and more common, and the domestic fighter has a stronger "nest", which effectively improves the combat capability of the People's Air Force and also reflects the atmosphere of the PLA's preparation for actual combat.

1

In the new century, the strength of the People's Air Force has been continuously enhanced, and new combat aircraft, such as the J-20 stealth fighter, the Air Police -500 early warning plane, the Y-20 air refueling tanker, and the Y-20 strategic transport plane, have been continuously equipped with the troops. The People's Air Force has transformed from territorial air defense to both offensive and defensive, and the threat that powerful enemy fighters and bombers can fly into our inland bombing is gone.

The PLA built "caves" at the airport, 3 meters of concrete thick, and carried 1,000 pounds of guided bombs from the US military

After the Third Middle East War, countries and regions have built fortified aircraft forts as important military facilities. NATO believes that strengthening aircraft forts and rapid repair capabilities are the two key items to maintain the combat capability of military airports.

2

China's rapid economic and technological strength and upgrading of its industrial base have provided a material basis for the People's Air Force to build fortified aircraft forts. Taking into account future wars, a strong enemy may interfere in the combat operations of our army. In this case, the Air Force built a large number of reinforced aircraft forts at front-line airfields.

The PLA's new machine fort is made of multi-layered reinforced concrete with different labels, the whole is arched, and the overall thickness can reach 3 meters. In this way, the reinforced concrete machine fort can fully withstand the attack of heavy bombs, especially small diameter guided bombs like SDB, and it is difficult to blow through such a machine fort. In addition to parking fighters, the aircraft fort has facilities such as refueling, loading, power and gas, etc., which can not only protect the combat aircraft, but also facilitate the fighters to complete take-off preparations directly in the bunker. The aircraft forts of some coastal airports or island airports also have functions such as moisture-proof and dehumidification, providing a good parking and maintenance environment for fighters.

The PLA built "caves" at the airport, 3 meters of concrete thick, and carried 1,000 pounds of guided bombs from the US military

3

Modern precision-guided weapons are developing rapidly, and some believe that the role of fortification is also declining. Indeed, in the future, air raid weapons will become better and more powerful, and even stronger aircraft forts will be destroyed by more powerful air attack weapons. For example, hypersonic attack missiles, the instantaneous speed of the missile hitting the target can reach Mach 5 or more, and there is not much problem penetrating the existing reinforced bunker at such a high speed. Mach 5 does not work, and missiles of Mach 7, Mach 10 can also be developed.

Fortifying the aircraft does not require 100% protection of all fighters, but rather weakens the opponent's strike efficiency and damage scale. The large number of fortified aircraft will force the opponent to use more advanced weapons for point-to-point attacks, and can only destroy one at a time, which is cost-effective. Inefficiency means that there is an opportunity to fight back, or even kill back. From these points of view, the construction of reinforced machine forts is also necessary.

The PLA built "caves" at the airport, 3 meters of concrete thick, and carried 1,000 pounds of guided bombs from the US military

The Eastern Theater J-8F fighter organized an exercise, and the buildings in the picture attracted a lot of attention. The hangars of these fighters, unlike the common hangars, are thick and somewhat terrifying. These hangars are actually PLA reinforced bunkers, also known as reinforced aircraft bunkers, which can withstand conventional air raid sabotage and even some ground-drilling bombs.

The Eastern Theater faces the direction of the Taiwan Strait, and the use of reinforced aircraft forts has a strong atmosphere of preparing for war, and even domestic old fighters have their own bunkers, and the treatment of combat aircraft more advanced than it can be imagined.

4

Some people may wonder why we didn't build strong machine forts before? In fact, this is a misunderstanding, we did not build the aircraft fort at the airport before, because this thing did not mean much at that time. In the past, the strength of the People's Air Force was still relatively weak, and it was difficult to obtain air supremacy. No matter how strong the bunker is, it will be destroyed in the face of repeated strikes by strong enemy bombers and attack aircraft.

The PLA built "caves" at the airport, 3 meters of concrete thick, and carried 1,000 pounds of guided bombs from the US military

From modern warfare

From experience, combat aircraft are most dangerous when they are on airfields, when combat aircraft have not yet taken off and there is no way to fight back. For example, in the third Middle East war, Israel wiped out most of the fighters of the air forces of Egypt, Syria and other countries on the ground by raiding airfields, seizing air supremacy, paving the way for its own victory in the war. During the war in Ukraine, Russia was raided by Ukraine on the Crimean airport and suffered certain losses, which once again showed the importance of fortification in modern warfare.

Fortified aircraft forts have improved the battlefield survivability of PLA combat aircraft, and the spread of these defensive facilities on the front line against Taiwan also gives us the opportunity to feel how tense the military struggle is in this direction. Of course, the PLA cannot be passively beaten, to paraphrase an old saying, the best defense is to attack, but the best way to fight is to surrender without fighting.

The PLA built "caves" at the airport, 3 meters of concrete thick, and carried 1,000 pounds of guided bombs from the US military

In future wars, the other side may use long-range attack weapons, such as cruise missiles, air-to-surface missiles outside the defense zone, etc. to attack our front-line airfields, especially coastal airfields, in which case we need to build reinforced aircraft forts to improve the survivability of fighters.

In the past, the strength of the People's Air Force was still relatively weak, and it was difficult to obtain air supremacy. No matter how strong the bunker is, it will be destroyed in the face of repeated strikes by strong enemy bombers and attack aircraft. Therefore, what we have built in large quantities before is a super strong bunker-cave hangar, which hollows out the mountain, and the usual deployment and maintenance of fighters must be completed in the mountain, and the other party can say that there is nothing to do about it. Of course, the disadvantage of the cave hangar is that the amount of engineering is huge and the cost is expensive. In addition, the geographical environment requirements are extremely high, and it is very difficult to build such airports on the plains and coasts, so the construction of cave hangars is more restricted.

From the experience of modern warfare, combat aircraft are most dangerous when they are on airfields, when combat aircraft have not yet taken off and have no way to fight back. For example, in the third Middle East war, Israel wiped out most of the fighters of the air forces of Egypt, Syria and other countries on the ground by raiding airfields, seizing air supremacy, paving the way for its own victory in the war. During the war in Ukraine, Russia was raided by Ukraine on the Crimean airport and suffered certain losses, which once again showed the importance of fortification in modern warfare.

After the Third Middle East War, countries and regions have built fortified aircraft forts as important military facilities. NATO believes that strengthening aircraft forts and rapid repair capabilities are the two key items to maintain the combat capability of military airports. Fortifying the aircraft does not require 100% protection of all fighters, but rather weakens the opponent's strike efficiency and damage scale. The large number of fortified aircraft will force the opponent to use more advanced weapons for point-to-point attacks, and can only destroy one at a time, which is cost-effective. Inefficiency means that there is an opportunity to fight back, or even kill back. From these points of view, the construction of reinforced machine forts is also necessary.

Revelation:

Fort reinforcement plays a vital role in the PLA's readiness strategy, a move that reflects the strategic needs and evolution in the context of modern warfare. Here are a few takeaways from the article:

The importance of protection: The rise of fortified aircraft shows that the need for protection in airports in modern warfare is becoming more and more prominent. At airfields, combat aircraft are the easiest targets to attack, so it is critical to protect them from the threat of enemy air strikes.

Anticipating Future Threats: The article mentions the possibility of long-range attacks on airports in the future, which requires the military to constantly adapt and anticipate strategic threats from hostile forces. By hardening the bunker, the army is able to effectively respond to the threat of new types of weapons.

Cost-effectiveness: While fortified bunkers do not completely eliminate the threat, they increase survivability by reducing the effectiveness and scale of damage to hostile forces. This cost-effective defense helps delay enemy attacks and provides opportunities to counterattack.

Summary:

Changes in the modern warfare environment have driven the evolution of military readiness strategies, in which fortification plays a key role as an important military facility. In the past, due to the relative weakness of military forces and differences in strategic needs, there were fewer fortified aircraft at airports. However, as the defense force increased and the threat changed, fortified aircraft were gradually popularized.

Built to a very high standard, these bunkers are resistant to a wide range of threats, from small-diameter guided bombs to large missile attacks. This provides a relatively safe parking and maintenance environment for combat aircraft. The existence of bunkers forces hostile forces to use more advanced weapons for point-to-point attacks, increasing costs and reducing efficiency. This helps to enhance the survivability of the defender, providing opportunities to counterattack.

In short, the popularity of fortified forts reflects the important combat readiness measures taken by the PLA to meet the needs of modern warfare. This trend underscores strategic flexibility and foresight to ensure that the military can maintain optimal combat conditions in the face of threats. At the same time, it reminds us that the defensive nature of war is just as important as offensive, and that the best tactic may be to surrender without a fight.

In order to maintain national security and stability, military readiness strategies must evolve to adapt to changing threats and war environments. The reinforcement of the machine fort as one of the key components reflects the development of this adaptability.

With the continuous increase of the PLA's strength, the modernization of national defense forces, and the equipment of new combat aircraft, the army has changed from territorial air defense to a strategic shift of both offensive and defensive. This shift means that the need for protection from air bases is more urgent. Fortifying the machine fort is part of meeting this need.

Despite the continuous development of modern military technology, some weapons may be able to overcome the defense of fortified aircraft, but the criticality of such defensive measures still needs to be emphasized. By building aircraft forts on a large scale, the military can spread risks in the face of threats, reduce the effectiveness of hostile forces, and provide a relatively safe takeoff and maintenance environment for combat aircraft. This helps maintain combat readiness and ensures that the military can respond quickly in an emergency.

In addition, the popularity of fortified aircraft forts also emphasizes the importance of defense in modern warfare. Although offense is usually more deterrent, effective defensive measures can weaken the willingness of hostile forces to attack and reduce the risk of war. This means that the military needs to consider both offensive and defensive strategies to ensure the security of the country.

Ultimately, the construction and popularization of fortified forts is an example of how the PLA is adapting to changing threats and the environment of warfare. Such adaptive and predictive combat readiness measures are essential to maintaining the security of the nation. In the future, military readiness will continue to evolve to adapt to new challenges, and fortification is only one of many readiness strategies, but it emphasizes the importance of anticipating future threats, defensive strategies, and combat readiness. This development applies not only to the PLA, but also to military leaders in other countries. Therefore, the popularization and construction of fortified aircraft forts is an important military initiative that helps to maintain the security and stability of the country.

The above content and materials are derived from the Internet, relevant data, theoretical research in the Internet materials, does not mean that the author of this article agrees with the laws, rules, opinions, behaviors in the article and is responsible for the authenticity of the relevant information. We are not responsible for any issues arising above or in connection with the above and the author of this article do not assume any direct or indirect legal liability.