The school prohibits students who use Apple mobile phones from signing up for poor students, and the students are agitated, who do you support? Recently, a news that a school stipulates that students who use Apple mobile phones cannot participate in the entry of poor students into the warehouse has caused extensive discussion.
Some students expressed support, believing that the subsidy for poor students is to give help to those who really need help, but surprisingly, many people have expressed opposition. Opponents argue that such rules are too arbitrary and impose an unnecessary burden on those who are not rich but are still struggling to do so. Some people may buy iPhones by saving and working, and they may still need poverty subsidies to support their studies. Therefore, the use of Apple mobile phones cannot be used simply as a criterion to determine whether poverty subsidies are needed.
In response to this statement, a classmate gave an example: the prize for the school evening raffle was a tablet, and a poor female classmate drew it. I touched it happily that night, and it was sold the next day, and it was sold at a very cheap price, and it was very happy to buy and sell very happily. After this classmate sold it, he bought himself a small coat, and then ordered the braised pork of fast food in the cafeteria for the first time, only a spoonful and a half, but he was very happy.
In the end, today's college students think independently, it is good to emancipate the mind, but everything must have a degree, once excessive, it becomes self-interest and self-interest. Can't you use an iPhone if you are poor? According to my previous personality, I will definitely say no, because your financial strength and spending power do not match. But now I would say, not impossible, but you have to think that when you use an iPhone and don't burden the rest of your life, you're out of poverty.