The content of this article comes from the Internet, if it is inconsistent with the actual situation or there is infringement, please contact to delete.
Introduction:
During the September 16-17, 2023, Malta talks, Wang Yi, Director of the Foreign Affairs Office of the Central Committee, held a series of rounds of meetings with Sullivan, the US President's National Security Adviser. Wang Yi made two important cautionary remarks on the Taiwan issue and Sino-US relations. First of all, he stressed the Taiwan issue as an insurmountable red line in Sino-US relations, and urged the US side to abide by the three Sino-US joint communiques and not support "Taiwan independence." This is a warning to the United States that Taiwan is part of China's core interests, that resolving the Taiwan issue is China's internal affair, and that any external interference will not be tolerated. Secondly, Wang Yi stressed that China's development has a strong endogenous driving force, follows the logic of history, and will be unstoppable. The all-round repression of the United States cannot prevent the legitimate development rights of the Chinese people. The importance of this meeting lies not only in the Taiwan issue and Sino-US relations, but also in the importance of maintaining high-level exchanges between the two sides, indicating that there may be more meetings between China and the United States.
The contradictions of US policy and the zero-sum game strategy have plunged Sino-US relations into unprecedented difficulties. In the economic field, the United States not only conducts a trade war with China, but also promotes allies to "decouple and break the chain", while vigorously suppressing China's high-tech industry, even by any means. However, this repressive strategy has had little effect or even backfired. For example, in the Huawei incident, the United States launched a chip war, but failed to prevent Huawei from using self-developed chips, showing that the United States' repressive actions may cause a backlash. Under these circumstances, the endogenous driving force of China's development will continue to drive it forward.
However, the tension in Sino-US relations is not just temporary; it is rooted in the fundamental strategic concept of the United States towards China. Although the US government has said that it expects to strengthen communication with China, on the other hand, it has not relaxed its suppression of China. This shows that the United States' containment thinking towards China has not changed substantially. Therefore, the dilemma in Sino-US relations is essentially caused by the United States. China has always adhered to the concept of peaceful and win-win development, and looks forward to working with the United States to promote common development and jointly build a community with a shared future for mankind. However, the United States insists on pursuing a zero-sum game and pitting itself against China, which will not only cause misfortune to the American people, but also harm the interests of people around the world.
Only when the US completely stops infringing on China's legitimate rights and interests can Sino-US relations return to the track of healthy development. This requires the United States to take a rational view of Sino-US relations, abandon the confrontational thinking mode, and promote exchanges and cooperation between the two sides with an attitude of win-win cooperation. Otherwise, the continuation of the current confrontation will be detrimental to either side and will pose a serious threat to global peace and stability.
1
The article highlights the core issues in U.S.-China relations: the Taiwan issue and economic and military competition. First of all, Taiwan is an insurmountable red line in Sino-US relations, and China emphasizes its core interests and calls on the US side to abide by the joint communiqué and not interfere in China's internal affairs. Second, China's development has a strong endogenous driving force, pursues an inevitable historical logic, and cannot be stopped. This means that the United States has failed to effectively block China's development under all-round and unprecedented suppression. The Huawei case, for example, shows that U.S. repression tactics can be counterproductive.
2
The Taiwan issue is the core interest of Sino-US relations, and the settlement of the Taiwan issue is China's internal affair, and foreign countries have no right to interfere.
China's development has a strong endogenous driving force, follows the logic of history and cannot be stopped.
The United States should maintain sincerity and stop infringing on China's rights and interests, so that Sino-US relations can return to the track of healthy development.
3
This article highlights the core contradictions in the current Sino-US relations and analyzes the key points of the Taiwan issue and economic and military competition. Taiwan is clearly defined as a red line in U.S.-China relations, China adheres to its core interests, and U.S. policy is contradictory in practice. The article highlights the endogenous dynamics of China's development, points out that the US repressive strategy has accelerated China's independent research and development capabilities in some aspects, and calls on the United States to re-examine bilateral relations while respecting China's rights and interests. However, as the U.S.-China dialogue progresses, perhaps the two sides will have more opportunities to communicate, depending on the United States showing more sincerity. On the whole, the development of China-US relations will be directly affected by the policies and actions of both sides, and both sides need to maintain an open and honest dialogue to resolve conflicts and achieve common interests.
1
The talks highlighted the complexity and sensitivity of disputes in international relations. As the core issue of Sino-US relations, the Taiwan issue not only affects the strategic interests of both sides, but also affects the stability of the entire Asia-Pacific region. China's insistence is based on safeguarding territorial integrity and national dignity, which is the consensus of the Chinese people. However, the United States must also recognize that an independent Taiwan is intolerable for China. Both sides need to address this sensitive issue in a dialogue and rational manner, not through threats or pressure.
It is also a fact that China's development momentum is unstoppable. China has made remarkable achievements on a global scale, and its endogenous driving force has enabled it to make remarkable progress in the fields of economy, science and technology. This increase in strength also brings responsibility, and China must participate in international affairs in a responsible manner and promote global common development.
2
The two sides need to resolve the Taiwan issue in a dialogue and rational manner and avoid exacerbating tensions through threats or pressure.
China's development is not only its own right, but also for better participation in global affairs and jointly promote global prosperity and peace.
In international relations, respect for each other's core interests and territorial integrity is of paramount importance, and violations by either side may trigger serious consequences.
3
The talks highlighted two key issues in U.S.-China relations: the Taiwan issue and China's continued development. The Taiwan issue is a sensitive focus of China-US relations, involves the core interests of both sides and regional stability, and needs to be resolved through dialogue and rational means. At the same time, China's development momentum is irreversible, and its endogenous driving force makes it play an increasingly important role on the international stage. The two sides need to respect each other, promote the development of bilateral relations in a constructive manner, and make positive contributions to global peace and prosperity.
The above content and materials are derived from the Internet, relevant data, theoretical research in the Internet materials, does not mean that the author of this article agrees with the laws, rules, opinions, behaviors in the article and is responsible for the authenticity of the relevant information. We are not responsible for any issues arising above or in connection with the above and the author of this article do not assume any direct or indirect legal liability.