The Philippine supply ship entered Ren'ai Jiao again, this time the Philippines notified China in advance

The content of this article comes from the Internet, if it is inconsistent with the actual situation or there is infringement, please contact to delete.

In the complex situation of China-Philippines relations, a series of recent events have aroused widespread concern. This international review will analyze the details and different points of view.

First, the fact that Philippine supply ships had intruded into the waters near Second Thomas Jiao without China's consent had sparked tensions. Chinese coast guard vessels drove away the ships in accordance with the law, prompting Philippine Foreign Secretary Locsin to protest and threaten to rely on the 1951 U.S.-Philippines Mutual Defense Treaty against China.

However, the subsequent development of this incident has attracted more attention. Philippine Defense Secretary Delphin announced that the Philippines has resent two supply ships to Second Thomas Reef. This time, they wisely informed the Chinese ambassador to the Philippines in advance and complied with a hard Chinese requirement not to send the Navy or Coast Guard to escort supply ships. As a result, two civilian vessels carrying Filipino servicemen re-entered the waters near Second Thomas Reef without military escort in western Palawan province to resupply the local marines.

This time, the Philippines appears to be taking a smarter and more pragmatic approach, compared to Foreign Minister Locsin who has been more emotional in his words and actions in the past. Delphine, perhaps more aware of the Philippines' complex geopolitical position in the South China Sea, adopted a better compromise that allowed the incident to subside rather than cause greater ripples.

This incident highlights the complexity of diplomacy, where the same incident can have different outcomes when handled differently. Although this incident has failed to have a serious impact on Sino-Philippine relations, the South China Sea dispute still exists and could become a ticking time bomb in the relationship between the two countries at any time.

What is more noteworthy is that the United States and other extraterritorial forces will not sit idly by. A U.S. government spokesman expressed similar threats and pressure to the Philippine foreign minister after the incident, referring to the U.S.-Philippines Mutual Defense Treaty, indicating that the United States would stand by the Philippines in the event of a conflict between China and the Philippines. This raises another complication in the relationship between China and the Philippines, as other countries with disputes over islands and reefs with China do not have strong U.S. support.

In addition to the United States, the European Union has also criticized the incident, which is partly surprising. The media quoted a statement from the EU's Department of External Operations accusing China of intercepting Philippine supply ships bound for Ren'ai Jiao, a rebuttal from the Chinese Foreign Ministry. While this incident may have limited impact on EU-China relations, it underscores the consistent position of the United States and Europe in dealing with China-related issues.

Taken together, this series of events reflects the complexity of China-Philippines relations and the multifaceted interests and influencing factors involved. Diplomatic decision-making plays a key role in the conduct of international affairs, and different ways of handling the same event can lead to completely different consequences. On the South China Sea issue, not only the regional situation is complicated, but also the involvement of extraterritorial forces, which makes it more challenging to maintain regional peace and stability.

A series of incidents around Ren'ai Jiao in the South China Sea have aroused the attention of China-Philippines relations. This international commentary aims to analyze these events and draw some enlightenment and truth from them.

First, the series of events reflects that the South China Sea dispute remains a potential flashpoint. Although the incident did not lead to serious conflict, disputes over islands and reefs in the South China Sea still exist and could stoke tensions at any time. This requires careful and dispassionate diplomacy on the part of all parties to resolve the dispute in order to avoid escalation.

Second, diplomacy is an art. Philippine Foreign Minister Locsin did not do any good to solve the problem. Philippine Defense Secretary Delfin, by contrast, was more calm and rational. This underscores the importance of attitudes and methods in diplomacy. Different diplomatic approaches can lead to different outcomes, so diplomats need to respond to complex international situations in a realistic way.

Another important revelation is the intervention of extraterritorial forces. Both the United States and the European Union have expressed concern about the incident and have taken a position of threat and pressure on China. The United States cited the U.S.-Philippines Mutual Defense Treaty with the Philippines, meaning the United States could side with the Philippines in the Sino-Philippine dispute. This underscores the international nature of the South China Sea dispute and the fact that the involvement of countries such as the United States could further complicate the issue.

Finally, the incident also highlighted the common position of China and the EU on some China-related issues. The European Union has criticized China's actions, which is in line with the US position. While this may not have a significant impact on EU-China relations, it underscores the consensus of the international community on certain issues.

To sum up, the Ren'ai Jiao incident in the South China Sea provides several important insights. First, the South China Sea remains a potential flashpoint that requires restraint and calmness on the part of all parties. Second, diplomacy is an art that requires careful and rational handling. The involvement of extraterritorial forces may complicate issues, and the international community may form a unified position on some issues. These factors need to be taken into account when dealing with disputes in the South China Sea in order to maintain regional peace and stability.

A deeper analysis of this series of events reveals that some key international relations principles and policy considerations are covered.

First, territorial disputes and sovereignty issues have always been a sensitive focus of international relations. The incident at Ren'ai Jiao in the South China Sea has once again highlighted the complexity of territorial disputes. The interests and rights of States in territorial matters often clashed, which required a balance between consultation and diplomatic negotiations. The implication of this principle is that all parties should actively seek to resolve disputes through diplomatic means, rather than unilateral actions, so as not to escalate tensions.

Secondly, international law and universally accepted rules play a vital role in the settlement of international disputes. China emphasizes sovereignty and territorial integrity in the South China Sea, while the Philippines relies on international law rulings to bolster its claims. This shows that international law and rules are essential for establishing a code of conduct between States. All countries should abide by international law and be willing to settle disputes through international arbitration institutions. The implication of this principle is that the international community needs to firmly support the authority of international law and rules to ensure the peaceful settlement of disputes.

Third, consistency and coordination in diplomacy are the key to maintaining stable relations. Philippine Foreign Minister Locsin and Defense Secretary Delfin's calm attitude once again underscored the importance of foreign policymaking. Diplomats should maintain a consistent stance on international issues and avoid excessive emotional reactions in order to ensure stable and predictable diplomatic relations. The implication of this principle is that diplomats need to coordinate in foreign policy and avoid internal divisions.

Finally, the South China Sea issue is a complex geopolitical chess game that has attracted the attention of many countries. The United States, China, the Philippines and others all have interests in the region, making it more difficult to resolve disputes. The series of events also highlights the complexity of geopolitics and the need for the international community to tread carefully in dealing with this complexity. International cooperation and dialogue are key to resolving such issues, and unilateral action could lead to an escalation of tensions.

To sum up this series of events, the Ren'ai Jiao incident in the South China Sea has provided us with important lessons about international relations. Territorial disputes need to be resolved through diplomatic channels, international laws and rules should be respected, diplomatic decision-making needs to be consistent and coordinated, and geopolitical complexities need to be carefully handled. These principles help guide informed decisions in maintaining regional peace and stability. The international community should continue to pay attention to the South China Sea issue and strive to provide support for the peaceful settlement of disputes in the South China Sea.

The above content and materials are derived from the Internet, relevant data, theoretical research in the Internet materials, does not mean that the author of this article agrees with the laws, rules, opinions, behaviors in the article and is responsible for the authenticity of the relevant information. We are not responsible for any issues arising above or in connection with the above and the author of this article do not assume any direct or indirect legal liability.