The material in this article comes from the Internet, if it is inconsistent with the actual situation or there is infringement, please contact to delete.
In a report by the Russian Satellite News Agency, Hamas spokesman Khazym Qasim made it clear that a ceasefire is unlikely at present due to the escalation of the conflict situation due to Israel's continuous air strikes in Gaza. It is too early to talk about reconciliation between the Palestinian and Israeli sides, and victory can only be decided through confrontation on the battlefield.
However, the facts on the ground show that the fighting in Gaza will be extremely difficult. For Iran and other Middle Eastern countries, Gaza is a red line, and if Israel sends a large-scale ground invasion of Gaza to eliminate Hamas, it is very likely to trigger other Middle Eastern countries to intervene and even trigger a new large-scale Middle East war.
More importantly, the United States is unlikely to allow Israel to take such an action. Under the current circumstances, Israel wants to challenge multinational joint military forces in the Middle East, which is difficult to defeat without large-scale military support provided by the United States. This also implies that the United States must choose between the Middle East and the Russian-Ukrainian battlefield, and it is obvious that the United States currently attaches more importance to the Russian-Ukrainian battlefield, so it is difficult for Israel to obtain strong support from the United States.
So can Israel solve the problem by intensifying its air strikes on Gaza? I'm afraid the answer is no. Because senior Hamas official Musa Abu Marzouk claimed that Hamas was currently holding hundreds of Israeli hostages, including senior IDF officers, and publicly threatened Israel: "We will retaliate." In other words, Hamas may use Israeli hostages as "human shields" to fend off attacks by the Israeli Air Force, which would come under enormous international pressure if Israeli airstrikes resulted in Israeli hostage casualties.
From Hamas's perspective, it would be clearly unrealistic for Hamas to try to seize Israeli settlements and engage in a frontal conflict. But if the battlefield is located in Gaza City, with Hamas's years of rooting in Gaza and Palestinian support for Hamas, if the IDF tries to engage in street fighting with Hamas in Gaza City, whatever the final outcome, it will cause huge casualties and will most likely turn into a protracted fight.
Before the outbreak of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, the United States had been actively promoting reconciliation between Israel and Saudi Arabia. From this point of view, the United States clearly hopes that Israel will try to use peaceful means to resolve the Palestinian-Israeli conflict, so as not to affect the implementation of the US "peace proposal" in the Middle East. Of course, if Israel adopts a policy of concessions, Netanyahu's government will be widely criticized and may even lead to the ouster of the government. But for the United States, as long as it can maintain its influence in the Middle East, the change of Israeli government will have little impact on it.
At the same time, the further escalation of the Palestinian-Israeli conflict will also bring great diplomatic challenges to the US government. If Israel takes drastic action, the United States will have to choose between preserving its alliance with Israel and seeking stability in the Middle East.
However, Israel is not the only party facing difficult choices. Hamas, too, is in a dangerous game. Although they could not compete with the IDF in frontal combat, street fighting in Gaza City, Hamas's skilled terrain and popular support, left the IDF in the area.
In addition, Hamas holds the powerful leverage of Israeli hostages, threatening to use them as a "human shield". This tactic can be used not only to protect oneself from Israel, but also to provoke strong condemnation on the international stage. Hamas's goal is to gain sympathy and support across the globe, especially from the Arab world and Iran.
In the arena of this conflict, geopolitical interests are inextricably linked to moral support. Israel seeks to defend national security, while Hamas seeks Palestinian freedom and independence. Increasingly, however, the conflict is a dangerous gamble that could spark a broader Middle East conflict.
The position of the United States will play a crucial role in this situation
Role. The United States is not only a staunch ally of Israel, but also an important mediator in the Middle East, and changes in its foreign policy may shape the course of the situation. If the United States continues to lean in favor of Israel, it will provoke more controversy and hostility in the Middle East, which could lead to more conflict.
The question now is therefore how to avoid further escalation of the conflict and to find a sustainable and peaceful solution. This requires coordination and good offices on the part of the international community to bring the parties to a willingness to sit down and negotiate to resolve their differences. Otherwise, the Middle East region will continue to be mired in tension and escalating conflicts, inflicting more suffering and misery on millions of innocent people. The search for a solution is a matter of urgency, and it must be based on respect for the rights of all parties and the pursuit of lasting peace.
The settlement of this conflict involves not only Israel and Palestine, but also the stability of the entire Middle East region. The international community should actively seek diplomatic channels to bring the parties back to the negotiating table and seek a long-term peaceful solution. Only through dialogue and compromise can the legitimate concerns of both sides be realized and opportunities for peace and stability in the Middle East region be created.
At the same time, all parties need to be aware that continuing to escalate the conflict will have a devastating impact on the entire region. The international community should step up humanitarian assistance to help those harmed in conflicts, especially innocent civilians. This is not only a moral imperative, but also helps to reduce the suffering of conflicts and prolong the humanitarian crises they cause.
In short, the settlement of the Palestinian-Israeli conflict concerns not only the two sides, but also peace and stability in the entire Middle East region. The international community needs to take firm action to promote the search for peaceful solutions and reduce the suffering and destruction caused by conflicts. Only through diplomacy and international cooperation can the goal of long-term peace be achieved and the risk of further escalation avoided.
The above content and materials are derived from the Internet, and the author of this article does not intend to target or allude to any real country, political system, organization, race, individual. The above does not mean that the author of this article endorses the laws, rules, opinions, behaviors in the article and is responsible for the authenticity of the relevant information. The author of this article is not responsible for any problems arising above or related to the above and does not assume any direct or indirect legal liability.
Due to the rules of the platform, you will only be recognized as a fan if you have more interaction with me. If you like my article, you can click "Follow", and you can receive the article push as soon as you become an iron fan. This article is only published in today's headlines, please do not move.