I'll continue to write and see if I can continue this text in ancient humorous language. However, to extract five doubts, there must be a rich inner monologue and character conflicts, which is a bit difficult. Let me think about how I should write it to make it enjoyable for readers.
The story goes like this, I heard that on October 6th, a woman took her child to go shopping, and suddenly found a pet dog on the side of the road. So, I squatted down with the child and wanted to touch this cute little guy.
But who knew that this dog was not on a leash, and suddenly tore and bitten. Whoosh! His face was injured and bleeding, and the situation was not good. After this happened, there was a lively discussion on the Internet, and everyone had their own opinions.
Some people support the dog owner, saying that this matter does not need compensation, thinking that they have teased the dog themselves, made the dog angry, and deserved to be bitten. Some people also say that if you squat down, the dog has retreated, indicating that it has been alerted, and it actually has to stick to the face, isn't this self-inflicted? I really don't understand, what is the difference between this and people sitting in pots at home from heaven.
Others supported the poor victim, saying that the dog owner needed full compensation. They said that his eyelids were bitten, the flesh on his face was about to show his bones, and this dog's mouth was too cruel. I have to say, these people are really distressed.
Later, the dog owner also issued the latest response, saying that the dog usually does not bite, but only bites when it is amused. Afterwards, they were willing to compensate Li for the loss as required.
The reporter also interviewed Li's neighbors, who said that the dog was often not leashed, and they were far away from the detour and did not dare to approach. Even the neighbors know that this dog is a little scary.
Then, a lawyer, Zhu Xue, said that according to the provisions of the Civil Code, if the dog owner violates the management regulations and fails to take safety measures for the dog, causing injury to others, the dog owner should be liable. However, liability may be reduced if it can be proved that the victim intentionally caused the injury.
Source Shangguan News said that in this case, if the dog owner did not leash the dog and violated the management regulations, then he should compensate for the loss. It is a bit of "gross negligence" to squat down and touch the dog without the consent of the dog owner, but it has not yet reached the level of "intentionality". Therefore, the responsibility of the dog owner will not be mitigated by the negligent behavior.
In fact, I think this woman is a bit of a fluke, such a big unleashed pet dog is on the side of the road, others are detouring, she actually has to pet, there is no prevention of danger. But then again, since the dog owner is not leashed or brought around, even if the dog is usually docile and well-behaved, there is a certain danger. Now that something so bad happened, he could only admit that he was unlucky.
The legal liability appraisal is partly quoted from the statement "Woman's face is bloody after being bitten by the roadside, the police have intervened, lawyer: If the dog is not leashed, the owner will be responsible".
Heck, after reading so many views, who do you think you should support? This world is really amazing.
I feel that this incident has given us a piece of advice: don't touch what you think is safe, the potential danger is always there. From my point of view, I felt that this woman was a bit of a fluke and did not have enough vigilance for danger.
However, then again, the owner of this pet dog is not leashed or brought around, even if the dog is usually docile and well-behaved, there is a certain danger. Now that such a bad incident has occurred, he can only consider himself unlucky.
To sum up, I think there are still some doubts about this matter, such as why the dog owner does not leash and does not bring it with him? Why do women have such a fluke mentality? Why did this pet dog suddenly bite someone? Why did this dog, usually docile and well-behaved, become so fierce? Why doesn't a woman's negligent behavior reduce the responsibility of the dog owner?
The ancients had clouds: "Things are faltering, and people are at odds." "This incident also reminds us to always be vigilant and not to take security lightly. Please leave your comments and tell us what you think about this matter.