laitimes

Than miserable! Public fund managers ranked in terms of losses, and Gülen, Zhang Kun, and Cai Haosong were all listed

author:A faint thought

It is difficult for funds with bad market conditions to make money, especially active funds, industry funds, and huddle funds are one word: "miserable"! The larger the scale, the more losses it will lose, mainly due to serious losses in the past two years. After the full registration system, some funds did not keep up and still held positions in the previous model, so many were in a loss-making state.

During Gülen's tenure, the scale was 84.440 billion, and the loss for the people was 23.418 billion.

Than miserable! Public fund managers ranked in terms of losses, and Gülen, Zhang Kun, and Cai Haosong were all listed

During Wang Baohe's term of office, the scale was 14.549 billion yuan, and the loss for the people was 23.016 billion.

The above two managers lost more than 20 billion yuan, and the following five lost more than 10 billion yuan.

During Fan Bing's tenure, the scale was 59.833 billion yuan, and the loss for the people was 19.896 billion.

During Yu Haiyan's tenure, the scale was 120.738 billion, and the loss for the people was 18.077 billion.

During Zhang Shengxian's tenure, the scale was 25.233 billion, and the loss for the people was 11.157 billion, a loss of 42%.

During Hu Jie's tenure, the scale was 69.074 billion yuan, and the loss of 11.066 billion yuan was helped to the people.

During Lin Weibin's tenure, the scale was 44.694, and he helped the people lose 10.526 billion yuan.

The following 5 are fund managers who have lost more than 6 billion yuan.

During Zhang Kun's tenure, the scale was 88.942 billion yuan, and he helped the people lose 9.888 billion yuan.

Than miserable! Public fund managers ranked in terms of losses, and Gülen, Zhang Kun, and Cai Haosong were all listed

During Chen Long's tenure, the scale was 12.715 billion yuan, and the loss of 8.790 billion yuan for the people was 8.790 billion, a loss of 60%.

During Feng Bo's tenure, the scale was 30.976 billion yuan, and the loss of 7.569 billion yuan for the people was helped.

During Rong Ying's tenure, the scale was 86.402 billion yuan, and the loss of 7.442 billion yuan for the people was helped.

Xu Rongman's scale during his term of office was 17.133 billion yuan, and he helped the people lose 6.298 billion yuan.

There are also 5 fund managers who have helped the people lose more than 4 billion.

During Li Yaozhu's tenure, the scale was 13.906 billion yuan, and he helped the people lose 4.963 billion yuan.

During Liu Huiying's tenure, the scale was 27.758 billion yuan, and he helped the people lose 4.622 billion yuan.

During Cai Haosong's tenure, the scale was 31.877 billion yuan, and the loss of 4.345 billion yuan was helped by the people.

Than miserable! Public fund managers ranked in terms of losses, and Gülen, Zhang Kun, and Cai Haosong were all listed

During Feng Chencheng's tenure, the scale was 30.721 billion, and the loss of 4.255 billion yuan was 4.255 billion yuan.

During Wu Chendong's tenure, the scale was 14.044 billion yuan, and the loss of 4.178 billion yuan was helped by the people.

There are 5 losses of more than 3 billion, 8 losses of more than 2 billion, 12 losses of more than 1 billion, and 15 losses of more than 100 million.

The cold of the public fund has a lot to do with the loss, because most of the fund positions are high-priced stocks, they will eventually return to valuation, coupled with the people's distrust of the fund and the redemption is serious, so the fund continues to fall, the original new fund quickly sold out, now the new fund is easy to fail.

Shuffle the cards and wait for the fund to pick up, because there are still many people looking forward to unwinding.

Than miserable! Public fund managers ranked in terms of losses, and Gülen, Zhang Kun, and Cai Haosong were all listed

Read on