The content of this article is only used for the first publication of today's headlines, please do not plagiarize.
Recently, a controversial video went viral on the Internet. The video purportedly came from a transcript of a banquet for Pheu Thai party lawmakers, with former Prime Minister Thaksin Shinawatra answering lawmakers' questions via video link. One of the deputy party leaders asked if he could make his ex-wife Mrs. Perman Gui a candidate for the leadership of the Pheu Thai Party. The question drew cheers from lawmakers. However, Thaksin replied that Mrs. Perman was not interested in politics, was old and was not good at public speaking. As soon as this video was exposed, it aroused discussion from all parties. Some see this as evidence that Thaksin is running into the Pheu Thai Party, while others see it as a discussion and meaningless. The Thai Government and the Election Commission have also expressed different views on this issue. Pheu Thai is reportedly a major political party in Thailand, founded in 2008. The party, which won parliamentary elections in 2011 and 2019, once ruled Thailand. However, since Thaksin's ouster, the party has been mired in a series of internal strife. The exposure of this video has greatly damaged the reputation of the Pheu Thai Party. In such a sensitive political environment, the exposure of this video has undoubtedly attracted widespread attention.
Some believe Thaksin is manipulating the internal affairs of the Pheu Thai party in an attempt to elect his ex-wife as a candidate for party leader. If this argument is true, then it may involve the manipulation of political parties, which is a serious violation of the Thai constitution. As a result, some Democratic lawmakers have said they are prepared to file a complaint with the Election Commission to investigate Thaksin and Pheu Pheu Thai's practices and discuss whether it needs to be dissolved. However, Thai Deputy Prime Minister Visanu expressed a different view on this. He believes that this is just an open discussion, a search for a solution, not manipulation of the internal affairs of the Pheu Thai party. Although he himself has not yet watched the video, the concept of "interference by external forces in political parties" is already clearly defined in the constitution. He believes that the discussion of the issue only takes place in a public setting, and that the speech can be heard by all, which is not the same as a secret exchange in the private office of the Pheu Thai party. Therefore, he believes that this behavior should not be taken as evidence of party manipulation, and there is no need to rush to dissolve Pheu Thai. Tha Rongwei, secretary general of Thailand's National Election Commission, also commented on this. He said there were only a few pictures and video footage and no conclusive evidence to support the allegations, so an immediate legal assessment was not possible.
He stressed that decisions must be based on hard facts and not solely on news reports. Overall, the exposure of the video has provoked food for thought about Thai politics. Thailand is a constitutional democracy based on a monarchy, but in practice, it faces many political problems. Problems such as political party manipulation, election fraud, and political corruption have always existed, seriously affecting Thailand's political stability and economic development. Political reform and increased transparency are therefore crucial for Thailand's future. Finally, we need to ask ourselves the question: Where is Thailand's political future? How can we achieve genuine political reform and transparency? Only political reform and maturity can lay a solid foundation for Thailand's future. In today's society, the Internet has become the main way for people to obtain information and spread views, and self-media has become an important force of Internet public opinion. In this context, the work of self-media editing is becoming more and more important. They are responsible for planning and editing a variety of content, including text, pictures, videos and other forms, to attract the attention of readers and guide public topics and public opinion.
However, due to the asymmetry of information and the speed of dissemination, the work of self-media editing also faces great challenges and responsibilities. Recently, on Chinese social media, a paragraph titled "Why did the US Congress attack Wall Street, tech giants?" The video went viral in a short period of time. The nearly 40-minute video claims to reveal the U.S. government's crackdown on Wall Street, tech giants, and the conflict of interests and culture between the United States and China through analysis of U.S. politics, economics, culture and other fields. In a short period of time, the video has been viewed more than 1 million times, sparking widespread controversy and discussion. On the one hand, some netizens believe that the video reveals the US government's hostility and suppression of China, proving that China should defend its interests more firmly. Others pointed out that the video was politically biased and untrue, saying that the views and conclusions in it should not be taken lightly. Others suspect that there is political party manipulation behind the video, trying to use public opinion to influence public perception and sentiment. So, how should we view this event? First of all, we need to recognize the great influence of self-media editors in disseminating information and guiding the direction of public opinion.
Their work requires strict adherence to journalistic ethics and professional ethics to ensure the authenticity and objectivity of information. At the same time, the public also needs to remain rational and objective, analyze and judge the views and information conveyed by self-media editors, and not easily believe allegations and conclusions that are not supported by solid evidence. Second, we need to recognize the great responsibility of self-media editors in disseminating information and guiding the direction of public opinion. Their work is not only to attract eyeballs and increase clicks, but also to promote social progress and justice. Self-media editors should pay attention to objectivity and impartiality in order to improve the public's knowledge level and ideological quality. Finally, we need to recognize the power and impact of the spread of public opinion. In the era of information explosion and disinformation, the importance of public opinion guidance is self-evident. The public needs to remain objective and rational, analyze and judge the authenticity and credibility of information, so as not to be misled and misunderstood. To sum up, the work of self-media editing is both important and arduous, and it is necessary to do a good job in screening, processing and disseminating information. At the same time, the public needs to remain rational and objective, and not to believe allegations and conclusions that are not supported by solid evidence.
Finally, we need to think more about and explore how to maintain fairness and objectivity in the dissemination of public opinion to promote the progress and development of society.
The above content and materials are derived from the Internet, and the author of this article does not intend to target or allude to any real country, political system, organization, race, individual. The author of this article is not responsible for any issues arising above or related to any of the above, nor does it assume any direct or indirect legal liability.