The content of this article comes from the Internet, if it is inconsistent with the actual situation or there is infringement, please contact to delete.
What do people who buy a tram regret?
In August, sales of new energy passenger vehicles reached 716,000 units, with a penetration rate of 37.3%, an increase of 9 percentage points from the 28.4% penetration rate in the same period last year. That is to say, now every third of people who buy a new car will choose a new energy carrier, and this number is still increasing.
In fact, new energy vehicles have many advantages, such as easy to drive, fuel saving, money saving, purchase tax exemption, lottery exemption and so on, but
Is buying a new energy vehicle really more cost-effective than buying a traditional gasoline car? So let's talk about it now. What do consumers who buy trams now have to say?
30% discount on battery life
Perhaps everyone has heard of a 30% discount on battery life. I'm telling you, it's really not amazing, and the discount can be even more outrageous when actually used.
Although the new tram has a range of more than 600 kilometers, I believe that the vast majority of people will not be able to drive that far.
The south may be a little better, and the battery life can be discounted by about 20%. 40% discount in the north in winter. A car with a cruising range of 600 kilometers can actually travel about three or four hundred kilometers.
Also, if driving on the highway, the battery life will be shortened faster. The south pays 30 per cent and the north pays up to 50 per cent.
In addition to discounts on battery life, charging is also a big problem. Generally speaking, pure electric vehicles are recommended to be charged when the battery power drops to 30%, and should not be overcharged. It is enough to reach 80%. This is mainly for protection. Battery, longer life. So complete
In fact, it needs to be charged every two or three hundred kilometers. If you commute 50 kilometers a day, you need to charge it every four to five days.
Although many cars now have super fast charging,
Limited to 30-80%. If you charge from 0 to 100%, you will not be able to start within an hour. Not to mention long-distance travel on holidays, queuing up at a gas station to charge can be life-threatening.
Half of the car is lost when it is repaired
According to the 2022 automobile zero sales rate report of the Insurance Research Institute of China
Most models have battery packs that are between 30% and 50% integrated, which means that the cost of replacing the battery is about 30-50% of the car's selling price.
What is this concept? Take the BYD Song EV as an example.
The proportion of battery cells is 45.88%, which means that the value of the battery is about 90,000 yuan based on the price of a vehicle of about 200,000 yuan.
The Tang EV has a zero-to-zero ratio of 25%, and the cost of the battery pack is about 80,000.
In fact, in many cases, the price given by the owner of the 4S shop to replace the battery is very different from the China Insurance Research Institute report. The cost of replacing the battery of an electric vehicle worth about 200,000 yuan is about 60,000 to 100,000 yuan.
As for why there is a sky-high maintenance cost, in fact, it is not only the cost of replacing the battery, but also the cost of repairing the damage to the body structure. Especially now many cars use battery-body integration technology, or integrated injection molding technology. When in use, the cost of building the car is low, but the maintenance cost of the consumer is multiplied.
Therefore, the annual premium of new energy vehicles is basically more expensive than that of gasoline vehicles.
Leeks are cut every year
In the past few years, due to Tesla's frequent price cuts, collective consumer rights protection incidents have occurred from time to time, and this "leek cutting" behavior has been angrily criticized. In fact, it's not just Tesla. After the price war in the automobile market broke out in full force, the entire new energy vehicle market can be said to be "cutting leeks" in disguise.
The reason for this is precisely that
Because the update and iteration speed of new energy vehicle technology and the update of the domestic new energy vehicle industry chain are too fast.
In the past, the replacement cycle of traditional fuel vehicles was basically about 4 years, and even the renewal of some models was limited to the exterior and interior.
On the one hand, because traditional fuel vehicles have become advanced, technological breakthroughs have become very difficult. On the other hand, this toothpaste-like update also helps to stabilize the retention rate of the model.
However, compared with the century-old era of internal combustion engines, the development of new energy vehicle technology is still in its infancy, and technology is changing every day. Looking back four years ago, most of the domestic pure electric vehicles were still "oil and electricity", even if 8155, lidar, 800V fast charging, etc. are now common, but these are still in the concept stage.
Therefore, when buying new energy vehicles, it is necessary to be prepared to "cut leeks". It is common to change a new model every year and the same price every six months. In addition, many models are reducing prices and adding new models to increase sales.
It's hard to imagine how strong a strong psychological quality is required to become a new energy vehicle owner.
Nowadays, the development of new energy vehicles is the general trend in China. Although there are still many potential pitfalls in the purchase of new energy vehicles, this does not affect consumers' enthusiasm for new energy vehicles. To be honest, from the perspective of extremely high cost performance and unprecedented intelligent technology experience, new energy brand models are actually more attractive than the current traditional fuel vehicles. So what do you think are the pitfalls of buying new energy vehicles? Welcome to share in the comment area.
The above content and materials are derived from the Internet, and the author of this article does not intend to target or allude to any real country, political system, organization, race, individual. The above does not mean that the author of this article endorses the laws, rules, opinions, behaviors in the article and is responsible for the authenticity of the relevant information. The author of this article is not responsible for any issues arising above or related to any of the above, nor does it assume any direct or indirect legal liability.