The content of this article comes from the Internet, if it is inconsistent with the actual situation or there is infringement, please contact to delete.
This article is only published in today's headlines, please do not move.
There is an online celebrity with tens of millions of fans who has come up with a thought-provoking theory, which is jokingly called the "Six Mantou Theory". He believes that the development of rural productivity mainly depends on advanced science and technology, such as fertilizers, pesticides, breeding and water conservancy, not just the reform of the household contract responsibility system. He called the household contract responsibility system only "the sixth steamed bun" and believed that this reform was only part of the development of rural productivity.
According to the Internet celebrity, if we take the college entrance examination, the civil service exam or the middle school entrance examination, do we still have hope? He believes that he can only become his fan. This argument seems simple, but it covers deep and abstract philosophical principles, involving philosophical concepts such as phenomenon and essence, and production relations in historical materialism. Therefore, every year, the college entrance examination, middle school entrance examination or national civil service selection examination will involve topics related to the reform of the family contract responsibility system to test the candidates' thinking and recognition ability, and eliminate those candidates with strong perceptual thinking ability but weak rational thinking ability.
In fact, science and technology such as fertilizers, pesticides, breeding and water conservancy are direct drivers of rural productivity development because they are concrete, visual and easy to understand. It is indisputable that the widespread application of these technologies has increased agricultural yields. Therefore, the view that these technologies have promoted the development of rural productivity is reasonable and easy to accept by a wide range of readers.
However, the reform of household contract responsibility as a change in production relations is more difficult to perceive because it belongs to the abstract nature. This reform has changed the ownership of land and the management autonomy of peasants, released the enthusiasm of peasants, and improved rural productivity and living standards. However, these changes are usually not easily perceived directly and require some philosophical and logical knowledge to understand.
Therefore, we need to clearly distinguish between the impact of science and technology and reform on rural productivity development. The application of science and technology is direct, figurative, and easy to understand, while reform is the adjustment of production relations, which has a more far-reaching impact but is also more abstract. Technology has driven rapid productivity development, while reform has provided farmers with more opportunities and autonomy.
To sum up, science and technology and reform have had a positive impact on the development of rural productive forces, but they belong to different categories and require us to have a certain theoretical basis to understand their role. Science and technology are the direct driving force, and reform is the fundamental cause, and the two have jointly promoted the rapid development of rural productive forces.
The above content and materials are derived from the Internet, and the author of this article does not intend to target or allude to any real country, political system, organization, race, individual.
Relevant data, theoretical research in network data,
The above does not imply endorsement by the author of this article of the laws, rules, opinions, actions and responsibility for the truthfulness of the relevant information.
The author of this article is not responsible for any issues arising above or related to any of the above, nor does it assume any direct or indirect legal liability.