The content of this article comes from the Internet, if it is inconsistent with the actual situation or there is infringement, please contact to delete.
The Taiwan issue has always touched our hearts, especially in recent years, when some people have trumpeted the idea of hindering the reunification of the motherland, causing many people to have doubts about the mainland without knowing the situation. Among them, there are some people who deliberately confuse the public and try to incite the people to be hostile to the mainland in order to seek Taiwan independence. However, such attempts are doomed to be futile.
Since ancient times, Taiwan has been an inseparable part of China, and the bloodline of the Taiwanese people is the same as that of the descendants of Yanhuang. Even if they are adrift for a long time, they will eventually return to their mother's arms. In dealing with the Taiwan issue, we choose a moderate approach, but if someone tries to take tough measures to divide China, we will never be weak. However, what we hope is for a solution through peaceful means, because it will ultimately be the people of the mainland who will be injured.
At present, we need to deal with those who undermine harmony, especially those who, in the name of scholars, undermine unity. Among them, one scholar named Zhao Chunshan once attracted widespread attention. So, who is Zhao Chunshan and what is his current situation?
Zhao Chunshan, a native of Guilin, Guangxi, has a similar life experience to Ma Yingjeou and is a person who moved to Taiwan with his ancestors. He was part of Ma Ying-jeou's team and initially showed a positive attitude. However, over time, his mind changed.
Zhao Chunshan first entered politics and attracted the attention of the Kuomintang. He joined Ma's team in 2008 and initially began with a very similar stance to Ma. However, on the Taiwan issue, he has repeatedly criticized the "one country, two systems" proposal, saying that it does not apply to Taiwan. Zhao Chunshan's thinking gradually evolved, from a superficially active promoter of cross-strait reunification to a person who tried to use foreign forces to make Taiwan dominant.
Zhao Chunshan's remarks affected the perception of the Taiwanese people and damaged the image of the mainland. Although he was welcomed by the mainland's high standards, he still spared no effort to tarnish the mainland's reputation after returning to Taiwan. He believes that the mainland cannot be compared with Taiwan in terms of health care and transportation, which is obviously stupid. The mainland's medical security system has been very perfect, and the speed of high-speed rail is also in the forefront of the world.
Zhao Chunshan's narrow worldview is puzzling. He had never actually understood the development of the mainland, but he made false assertions. In fact, the mainland has made tremendous progress in less than 20 years, especially in the high-tech sector. Taiwan appears relatively small compared to the mainland, and in some respects it doesn't even need high-speed rail.
However, we have always taken a gentle approach because we feel sorry for the people of Taiwan and do not want to see them hurt. At the same time, we have adopted a series of policies to suppress those who seek to undermine cross-strait harmony, especially entrepreneurs who seek to support Taiwan independence elements. We not only sanctioned these businesses, but also imposed heavy fines on them. These measures have made some entrepreneurs change their behavior, realizing that only cooperation with the mainland can lead to better development.
In short, we hope for reunification through peaceful means, because we understand that the people of Taiwan are innocent. The solution of the Taiwan issue cannot be separated from our joint efforts, and those who split the motherland will eventually pay the price for their mistakes. Zhao Chunshan's words and deeds will not change our determination to achieve reunification, and we firmly believe that the Taiwan issue will eventually usher in a peaceful settlement.
The above content and materials are derived from the Internet, and the author of this article does not intend to target or allude to any real country, political system, organization, race, individual. The above does not mean that the author of this article endorses the laws, rules, opinions, behaviors in the article and is responsible for the authenticity of the relevant information. The author of this article is not responsible for any issues arising above or related to any of the above, nor does it assume any direct or indirect legal liability.