The content of this article comes from the Internet, if it is inconsistent with the actual situation or there is infringement, please contact to delete. This article is only published in today's headlines, please do not move.
The tensions that entangle Ukraine and Russia are becoming increasingly complex. Not so long ago, the Kremlin suffered a special attack, and Ukraine denies this event. The truth and motive of the incident remain mysterious, but it has aroused widespread concern in the international community.
First, let's review the causes of events. In the early hours of May 3, the Kremlin was attacked by two drones, but Russia claimed to have successfully disabled them using modern electronic warfare equipment and that Russian President Vladimir Putin was not injured. The incident immediately sparked a heated international debate, while Ukraine denied involvement in the attack, claiming that they had no motive to attack the Kremlin.
However, the matter did not end there. The Kremlin quickly made a special class declaration declaring that it reserved the right to retaliate at the right time and place. During this time, a video circulating on the Internet, showing a shocking picture of a fire. The footage shows that at the moment of the explosion, a huge pillar of flame light rises and appears to explode not far from the Kremlin. This sight makes people wonder what truth is hidden behind the incident.
To better understand the nature of the explosion, an investigator conducted a detailed analysis. Based on the formula for sound propagation and local meteorological data, he concluded that the explosion was airborne, about 3.4 kilometers from the point of explosion. This distance is enough for people to feel the strong impact of the explosion, but there is no shock wave, which is not in line with traditional explosions. In addition, there was a flash of blue light in the video, which was inconsistent with the atomic bombing and more like the result of the detonation of missile ammunition.
Through extensive research and consultation with experts, investigators eventually learned that the explosion was actually the destruction of a Ukrainian weapons depot. The arsenal contained weapons and ammunition from several major NATO members, and the attack resulted in huge losses, and NATO's heavy firepower was destroyed before it even had a chance to participate in the battle.
The incident not only raised doubts about the truth of the incident, but also revealed Russia's inadequacies in air defense. A suicide drone flew towards the Kremlin, then exploded. Although the Russian side claimed that the drone was paralyzed, the video showed that the drone exploded on its own. This suicide drone attack raises questions about Russian air defense, as such small targets seem to be able to easily cross the air defense system's barrier.
Now the question is, who is really behind it? Ukraine insists it was not involved in the attack, but Russia is convinced that Ukraine was responsible and will retaliate. The attitude of the United States is also in the spotlight, do they encourage radical actions in Ukraine? The truth of the whole incident seems to be increasingly murky, and there is uncertainty about what may happen next.
Regardless of the truth of the incident, the attack has already aroused widespread concern and concern in the international community. As tensions between Ukraine and Russia continue to escalate, one has to worry that this may be just the tip of the iceberg and that more serious incidents may occur in the future. Now, the world is waiting for the next step, and Ukraine must be ready for possible retaliation. All this is deeply worrying, as the future situation is still fraught with uncertainty.
The above content and materials are derived from the Internet, and the author of this article does not intend to target or allude to any real country, political system, organization, race, individual. The above does not mean that the author of this article endorses the laws, rules, opinions, behaviors in the article and is responsible for the authenticity of the relevant information. The author of this article is not responsible for any issues arising above or related to any of the above, nor does it assume any direct or indirect legal liability.