The material in this article comes from the Internet, if it is inconsistent with the actual situation or there is infringement, please contact to delete.
On April 24, 2023, India was reporting more than 300,000 new coronavirus cases every day, and the cumulative number of infections has exceeded 16 million. Meanwhile, on the streets of London, England, more than 10,000 Britons took to the streets to protest the government's current mask ban, vaccine passports and orders banning mass gatherings.
The protesters opposed the government's policy of tying vaccination status to passports. Many Britons felt that such policies violated their human rights and treated them as prisoners, locked up in the state. Indians are suffering from covid, while the British are taking to the streets to express their dissatisfaction with government policies. There are profound reasons behind this discrepancy.
First, this phenomenon stems in part from the division of education in Western countries over the years, dividing education into mass education and elite education. Western mass education focuses on happy learning, similar to China's past "happy education." Elite education, on the other hand, is more rigorous and requires students to achieve a certain level of academic achievement. However, elite education is often accompanied by high costs, which leads to the division of the educational class in society and produces a large number of anti-intellectual people. Since the outbreak of the pandemic, we have seen a lot of puzzling anti-intellectual rhetoric not only in the UK, but also in the US. The makers of these statements are not because of IQ problems, but because of differences in education levels, which lead to their anti-intellectual sentiment.
On the other hand, the media also plays a key role. For example, media outlets such as the BBC have long used a distorted perspective to cover a range of news, including China, which divides audiences into two groups:
One group of people thinks that China's anti-epidemic action does not seem to be difficult, and the new crown epidemic may not be terrible, and it may even be fictional.
Another group found the BBC's reporting biased, which made them doubt other BBC reporting. When the BBC reports real information about the UK pandemic, they also selectively dismiss it as disinformation.
This is a classic example of a world flickering that eventually leads to a crisis of confidence among the people at home. Even without the long-term influence of the media, the problem of mutual distrust between ordinary British people and the upper elite has become more serious due to the division of education classes, which is the root cause of the frequent social unrest in Britain. For example, a few years ago, young people in the UK held a "zero dollar purchase" event in a big city such as London is a typical example.
In addition, the British government's current policy focus does not seem to be to fight the epidemic at home, but to frequently intervene in international affairs, such as sending warships to the South China Sea or throwing so-called "human rights issues" from time to time. It is only when a crisis erupts that governments are forced to pause and reflect on policy. This policy orientation has also exacerbated social discontent in the country.
To sum up, there are complex reasons behind the different responses of India and the United Kingdom, including differences in education systems, the influence of the media, and the direction of government policies. These factors are intertwined, resulting in different attitudes between the people of the two countries on the issue of fighting the epidemic. We hope that these differences will provoke reflection on governments and promote the development and implementation of more scientific, just and effective pandemic responses. After all, the global fight against the pandemic is a shared responsibility, and only through collaboration and rational action can this global challenge be overcome.
The above content and materials are derived from the Internet, and the author of this article does not intend to target or allude to any real country, political system, organization, race, individual. The above does not mean that the author of this article endorses the laws, rules, opinions, behaviors in the article and is responsible for the authenticity of the relevant information. The author of this article is not responsible for any problems arising above or related to the above and does not assume any direct or indirect legal liability. Due to the rules of the platform, you will only be recognized as a fan if you have more interaction with me. If you like my article, you can click "Follow", and you can receive the article push as soon as you become an iron fan. This article is only published in today's headlines, please do not move.