The content of this article comes from the Internet, if it is inconsistent with the actual situation or there is infringement, please contact to delete. This article is only published in today's headlines, and it must be investigated!
Lead:
A recent incident has reignited questions about the U.S. military's behavior. A small plane broke into the skies over Washington, D.C., without declaration, and the US military rushed to catch up, resulting in a catastrophe. At the same time, in the recent incident in the South China Sea, the United States accused Chinese fighters of "unprofessional interception", but what is the truth of the matter? This article will delve into the background of these two incidents, revealing the double standards and hegemonic behavior.
A small plane broke into the skies over Washington, D.C., without declaration, and the US military urgently dispatched F-16 fighters to catch up and intercept it, which quickly attracted widespread attention from the media and social platforms. At the time of the incident, a strong sonic boom resounded over Washington, causing local residents to panic, and some even said that their coffee tables were shaking.
The U.S. Department of Defense claims that when their F-16s intercepted small aircraft, the latter did not respond in any way. Soon after, however, the small plane crashed in the mountains of Virginia, billowing smoke from the site. It is reported that there are four personnel on this small plane, and there is a high probability that all of them have encountered accidents, which has caused widespread doubts and speculation.
Some believe the small plane appeared to be on autopilot at the time, and the U.S. military also said the plane's pilot appeared to have fallen into a coma. As a result, many wonder whether such a violent catch-up operation is necessary. This incident is also reminiscent of the recent incident in the South China Sea, where the United States accused Chinese fighters of "unprofessional interception".
In the South China Sea incident, the US Indo-Pacific Command issued a statement making groundless accusations against China, saying that the US reconnaissance plane was "unprofessionally intercepted" by Chinese fighters over the South China Sea, and also claimed that Chinese fighters carried out "unnecessary aggressive maneuvers" against US military aircraft. Some US media said that China's J-16 fighter suddenly cut into the front of the US reconnaissance plane during the accompanying flight, and the aircraft's wake "obviously interfered" with the flight path of the US reconnaissance aircraft.
Some commentators believe that the reason why the United States hyped up the so-called "unprofessional interception" is, on the one hand, to smear China and create the "China threat theory," and on the other hand, to provide US Secretary of Defense Austin, who is about to speak at the "incense meeting," an example that can blame China. However, the U.S. military aircraft crossed international airspace to approach China's territorial waters, which is clearly a provocative act. Experts point out that no country can sit idly by for reconnaissance at such close range. It was China's resolute interception that forced the US reconnaissance plane to change its flight path and eventually leave the skies over the South China Sea.
The US interception operation not only caused panic among residents, but also caused a tragedy, but the US military seems to ignore it, which shows obvious double standards. This is not the first time this approach has emerged, and it reveals the hegemonic nature of the United States. In today's multipolar international landscape, if the United States continues to manipulate these tricks, it will only isolate it and eventually be abandoned by the times.
Summary:
These two incidents exposed the double standards and hegemonic behavior of the US military. Whether it is the violent catch-up of small planes or the accusations against Chinese fighters, it shows the unfairness and unprofessionalism of the United States in international affairs. In the era of globalization, the international community needed more cooperation and understanding than unilateralism and double standards. Only an attitude of equality and mutual respect can maintain world peace and stability.
The above content and materials are derived from the Internet, and the author of this article does not intend to target or allude to any real country, political system, organization, race, individual. The above does not mean that the author of this article endorses the laws, rules, opinions, behaviors in the article and is responsible for the authenticity of the relevant information. The author of this article is not responsible for any issues arising above or related to any of the above, nor does it assume any direct or indirect legal liability.