laitimes

The post-80s account manager was instructed by the post-80s president to "blindly approve" the loan, losing more than 50 million yuan and being banned for life

author:Set sail on the web
The post-80s account manager was instructed by the post-80s president to "blindly approve" the loan, losing more than 50 million yuan and being banned for life

Recently, an astonishing financial scandal surfaced, involving illegal lending of up to 73.54 million, causing losses of more than 50 million. According to the instructions of the post-80s president, the post-80s account manager repeatedly "blindly approved" more than 100 loans despite the risks, eventually causing huge losses. This case is shocking and has triggered deep thinking about financial regulation and legal protection.

The post-80s account manager was instructed by the post-80s president to "blindly approve" the loan, losing more than 50 million yuan and being banned for life

description

According to the investigation, the relationship manager was instructed to "blindly approve" the loan, meaning that the necessary risk control and due diligence were not carried out. These loans included a large number of high-risk projects and insolvent borrowers, and such sloppy operations resulted in immeasurable losses. Prior to the case, the bank's president had repeatedly given verbal instructions to the relationship manager and pressured him to complete the loans, which were beyond the normal scope of business.

body

This account manager, who is only in his thirties and eighties, was severely cracked down on illegal lending. As the backbone of the bank's key positions, he was supposed to handle every loan application with prudence and professionalism. However, based on a series of ulterior directives he took over, he desperately passed and disbursed a large number of high-risk loans.

Due to a lack of due diligence and compliance review, many of these loans are simply unable to repay and borrowers are not honest customers. The account manager completely ignored the existence of risk and the potential loss caused by the loan. As a result, these bad loans quickly accumulated, eventually resulting in losses of more than $50 million.

The financial scandal revealed two problems, one is the weak supervision of the financial industry, and the other is the urgent need to strengthen the legal protection of investors. On the one hand, verbal instructions and pressure from the president of the bank facilitated the irregular operation of the relationship manager and exposed loopholes in financial supervision. On the other hand, the legal protection of investors in the financial industry is obviously not perfect, and they should have the right to know and effectively protect their rights and interests.

This case has aroused widespread attention from all walks of life on financial supervision and legal protection. At present, it is urgent for relevant departments to carry out comprehensive rectification and thorough supervision of the financial industry to ensure the healthy development of the financial market. At the same time, strengthen legal protection measures, provide more perfect legal support for investors, and ensure that their rights and interests are not infringed.

Whether it is negligence within the bank or negligence by regulators, it should be seriously dealt with and reflected. Only through thorough investigation and rectification can we build a fair, transparent and safe financial environment for investors, so that everyone's hard-earned money can be properly protected.

end

The public opinion of this illegal lending incident reminds us once again that the financial industry cannot tolerate any corruption and illegal behavior. For those who ignore their duties and wantonly violate the law, the law will be severely punished. At the same time, we should also strengthen professional ethics education and legal awareness training for employees in the financial industry, so as to nip violations of laws and regulations in the bud.

The post-80s account manager was instructed by the post-80s president to "blindly approve" the loan, losing more than 50 million yuan and being banned for life