laitimes

Kishida asked people to come to China to deliver letters, but the Chinese side even refused to bring the letters, and the Japanese side had only one way to go

author:Fish jingle

Before reading this article, please click "Follow", which is convenient for you to discuss and share, and can bring you a different sense of participation, thank you for your support!

Introduction: Defend justice and preserve territorial integrity

Recently, Japanese Foreign Minister Tsuto Kishida suddenly proposed to visit China and deliver letters, which has aroused widespread concern in the international community.

Kishida asked people to come to China to deliver letters, but the Chinese side even refused to bring the letters, and the Japanese side had only one way to go

However, both the Chinese government and people expressed strong opposition to this action and expressed their firm refusal to accept Kishida's visit and letters. This result is not accidental, but a thoughtful decision based on historical facts, international law and Chinese public opinion. The purpose of this article is to explain the rationality of China's refusal to accept Kishida's trustees, and to propose that Japan should follow a path of friendly cooperation with its neighbors.

Paragraph 1: The Chinese people resolutely safeguard national interests and territorial integrity

As a large country with a history of 5,000 years of civilization and a vast territory, the Chinese people deeply believe in and practice the principle of safeguarding their national interests and territorial integrity. Historically, China has never taken the initiative to invade the territory of other countries, nor has it ever occupied an inch of other countries' land.

Kishida asked people to come to China to deliver letters, but the Chinese side even refused to bring the letters, and the Japanese side had only one way to go

On the contrary, China has always adhered to the Five Principles of Peaceful Coexistence and advocated mutual respect and equal treatment in international relations. However, in the past history, the Japanese aggressors repeatedly violated China's territory, resources and people's rights and interests, bringing great suffering and losses to China.

Paragraph 2: Historical facts and international law support China's protest attitude

Kishida's sudden proposal to visit China and deliver letters has confused many people. However, the viewpoint based on historical facts and international law can fully explain the reasonableness of China's refusal. Since the end of World War II, Japan's unruly behavior has caused deep contradictions and hostility between the two countries. In particular, with regard to the sovereignty of the Diaoyu Dao and its affiliated islands, Japan has repeatedly attempted to steal these territories by means of encroachment and coercion in disregard of historical facts.

Kishida asked people to come to China to deliver letters, but the Chinese side even refused to bring the letters, and the Japanese side had only one way to go

In addition, international law clearly stipulates that disputes between the parties concerned should be settled through peaceful means, and emphasizes respect for historical facts and national sovereignty.

Paragraph 3: The voice and anger of the Chinese people cannot be ignored

After the news of Kishida's request to visit China and deliver the letter was announced, the Chinese expressed strong protest and anger. Countless Chinese netizens have posted on social media platforms expressing their outrage at Japan and support for the Chinese government's steadfast refusal. This is not only a voice, but also a manifestation of the intolerance of Chinese people towards historical tragedies and disputes. Chinese people yearn for peace and stability, but they will never easily forget the suffering and humiliation of the past.

Paragraph 4: Japan should follow the path of friendship and cooperation

In the face of China's resolute refusal, the Japanese government and people should return to rationality and realize that reflecting on history and reconciliation is the only way to improve bilateral relations.

Kishida asked people to come to China to deliver letters, but the Chinese side even refused to bring the letters, and the Japanese side had only one way to go

Only through sincere dialogue and friendly cooperation between the Governments and peoples of the two countries can the foundation of mutual trust and common prosperity be established. Japan can learn from Germany's approach to historical issues, face up to history, reform itself, and demonstrate friendly gestures to China and other East Asian neighbors with practical actions.

Conclusion: China's refusal is a reasonable choice

In short, it is not groundless that Kishida entrusted people to send letters to China, and the Chinese side refused to bring the letters together. The determination of the Chinese Government and people to safeguard national interests and territorial integrity cannot be underestimated. Japan should face up to its history, change its wrongdoing, and establish long-term and stable relations with China and other East Asian countries through reconciliation and friendship. Only in this way can we make positive contributions to peace and prosperity in Asia and the world.

Disclaimer: If the content of the article involves the content of the work, copyright pictures or other issues, please contact the author within 30 days, if the reflection is true, we will delete the responsible article as soon as possible. The article is for reference only and does not constitute any investment or application advice.