James' sudden decline in historical status is not true. Although he claims to be the best in history and on a par with Jordan, that doesn't mean his stature has declined or attracted public outrage.
James is considered one of the greatest players in history because of the remarkable achievements he has achieved in his career. He has won four NBA championships, four Finals Most Valuable Player (MVP), and was named to the All-Star Team multiple times. His all-round technique and leadership on the pitch also made him an admirable player.
However, some may be unhappy with his self-proclaimed best in history. This is because there are many great players in history, such as Jordan, Abdul-Jabbar, Magic Johnson, etc., who also have outstanding achievements and influences. Everyone has their own likes and preferences, and there are different opinions and controversies about who is the best in history.
However, this argument does not mean that James' status has declined or attracted public outrage. His achievements and abilities are undeniable, and his self-confidence is also taken for granted. Every fan and critic has the right to have their own opinion on the status of different players, and that's the beauty of basketball.
Regardless, James has established himself as a legend throughout his career, and his achievements and contributions have left a lasting impact on the basketball world. We should appreciate his talent and hard work and respect his status as a great player without having to argue too much about whether he is really the best in history.
While James claims to be the best ever, that confidence and pride is a normal performance for him as a top player. However, this has also caused some controversy and doubts.
On the one hand, some argue that James is too conceited when he claims to be the best in history. His self-confidence is seen by some as arrogant and unscrupulous. Some fans and critics believe that Jordan, as the greatest player in history, has more championship rings and individual honors, so James should not be compared to him.
On the other hand, there are also those who think James does deserve to claim to be the best in history. His all-round ability and dominance have made him an undisputed superstar. His performance and leadership on the field earned him plenty of praise. In addition, he has been successful on multiple teams, showing his adaptability and impact.
However, whether for or against James, this argument is subjective and there is no one definitive answer. There are many great players in basketball history, and their value and contribution cannot be measured by simple rankings. Every fan has their own preferences and standards, so the debate about who is the best in history will always be there.
Above all, we should respect and appreciate the achievements and talents of each player. James' status and influence as a great player is undeniable. We should turn the argument into a love and discussion of basketball, not an attack and fight over individual players. Basketball is a team sport, each player has their own unique contribution and value, and we should respect and celebrate their efforts and achievements.