Recently, basketball commentator Xu Jingyu angrily scolded Huo Nan on social media, accusing him of inappropriate remarks about Zhou Qi in the past and his current behavior towards the men's basketball team. This incident sparked a heated discussion in basketball circles.
Xu Jingyu said that Huo Nan publicly criticized Zhou Qi as a "street slipper" during the 19 World Cup, which not only hurt Zhou Qi, but also affected the image of Chinese basketball. And now, Xu Jingyu believes that Huo Nan's article on the men's basketball team is also inappropriate, and believes that this behavior is unfair.
Huo Nan responded that his remarks were based on concerns and expectations for Chinese basketball, not individuals. He also said that Xu Jingyu's article also has some problems, and the efforts of the Chinese men's basketball team should not be completely repudiated.
The incident reflects the need for basketball commentators to be fair and objective in their dealings with players and teams, and to avoid making aggressive remarks because of personal feelings. At the same time, it also reminds fans to look at basketball games and players rationally, and not to attack others because of momentary emotions.
As basketball commentators, we should analyze the game and player performance in a professional manner, rather than attacking others with emotional language. We should respect the efforts and dedication of each player, while also acknowledging their shortcomings. Only in this way can we truly evaluate basketball games and player performance fairly and objectively. Xu Jingyu and Huo Nan fight, who are you standing on this wave? Here's probably the thing. Xu Jingyu previously posted that she asked Ying to be the coach of the national team and received an annual salary of 50,000. If the results are not good, she will return 200,000 to enter the national team. But at the same time, I do not do specific coaching work, but give the power of coaching to Li Nan, Li Chunjiang, Du Feng, Guo Shiqiang, let these excellent domestic coaches let go and effortlessly. Under the pressure of public opinion, we must give good guidance.
In a show, former national men's basketball players Huo Nan and Xu Jingyu argued about the matter. Huo Nan probably means that the Chinese men's basketball team is currently at the lowest point, the players have done their best in the game, and what Chinese players and coaches, including Jordjevic, need now is a relaxed public opinion environment, and in the next five years and six years, Chinese basketball will usher in a spurt of growth. As a sports commentator and an Internet celebrity, Xu Jingyu should treat his heart with heart and not hurt others with bad words. The conversation between the two was very brief. Xu Jingyu won in two rounds. Netizens almost overwhelmingly supported Xu Jingyu. The attitude of the fans is indeed worth Yao Ming's savouring. This round, Xu Jingyu won again. As a grassroots commentator, Xu Jingyu is a traffic master. Whether it was the previous battle with the three masters of Jiesbon, or the CP with Mina, and not long ago, he singled out with Ke Fan, and waves of traffic made a lot of money. Each time it ended in big wins.
Objectively speaking, Xu Jingyu has two kinds of talent in his stomach. She has high basketball knowledge, top-notch thinking logic, and first-class eloquence. Briefly talk about this conversation between the two, why did Huo Nan lose? Or why is Huo Nan's view not recognized by the majority of basketball fans? Because Huo Nan made a preconceived mistake at the beginning, always pretending to be a basketball practitioner and professional, and admonishing Xu Jingyu with a high-minded attitude, in fact, he was also educating fans, in order to give confidence to the men's basketball team, not to give the men's basketball team confidence. If you lose, you will scold, which means that all the current problems of Chinese basketball are caused by fan opinion. As a former national player, Huo Nan has served as head coach and general manager. He must have his own understanding of Chinese basketball and the CBA league, and will also have his own position and position. There is nothing wrong with that. Everyone has their own opinion. Yes.
But I do disagree with some of his points. First of all, he said that the talent of the Chinese men's basketball team will reach a blowout state in the next few years. Where is the talent? Just those U19 people? What about the performance at the World Junior Championships? It's not that these kids are bad, let them play real professional games for two years and see. Was Wang Zhelin stronger than them when he was young? Is it a genius? How is it now? People always say that basketball practitioners should be considerate of each other, but can basketball practitioners be considerate of fans? Yes, some fans are indeed irrational. When they are dissatisfied with a player or coach, it can even reach the level of online violence. This is not desirable. Coaches and players who have suffered online abuse are advised to report to the police immediately.
But are more fans deeply hurt by this men's basketball team? Fans are always asked to learn about basketball practitioners, coaches, managers and players. Who can understand the hurt hearts of fans? If you want the fans to give you a relaxed public opinion environment, the premise is that you play well. As Xu Jingyu said, it is stronger than the American men's basketball team. If you don't behave well, you will still be criticized when you return home. Chinese fans, by contrast, are tolerant enough. Did anyone complain about the men's basketball team at the 2008 Olympics? Does anyone complain about the Chinese table tennis team? He had good grades and little to do, and even if he wanted to complain, he couldn't find anything to complain about. If you play well, you should be praised, and if you play poorly, you should be encouraged? Are the Chinese men's basketball team giant babies from coaches to players? Something went wrong and they didn't know how to fix it. Do these basketball practitioners want to shut up fans? Is it bad to point out the problem? If you want your fans to see you differently, that's fine. We didn't play well in the World Cup and the fans recognised that and stopped talking about it. They're all strong teams and you can't beat them. The Asian Games are about to begin. Japan's Hachimura and Watanabe won't be back, the Philippines' Clarkson won't play, and half of the team's main players won't play.
Against such an Asian opponent, winning the championship is not too much for you, right? Mr. Du Feng can beat the Japanese team by more than 20 points, but Jordjevic can't win the Asian Games championship? Does it fit? Also, with the CBA league about to start, can our internationals stop chattering on the field and yelling and cursing at the referee. The ball played like this, how could he be so angry? How dare you have such a big temper? Fans came to watch the game, not the monkey show. Coming back to the fight between Xu Jingyu and Huo Nan, I don't think there is anything wrong with what Xu Jingyu said. If you make a mistake, you have to correct it, and if you are beaten, you have to stand up. When will the Chinese men's basketball team be able to put down its high-minded attitude, empathize with the fans, and at least have a sense of shame and awe, so that the performance of the Chinese men's basketball team can really improve.
As for how to improve and how to solve it, that's your business. There is no need to put the blame on the fans. Some basketball practitioners really don't know what the problem is with the Chinese men's basketball team. Xu Jingyu said that Huo Nan publicly criticized Zhou Qi as a "street slipper" during the 19 World Cup, which not only hurt Zhou Qi, but also affected the image of Chinese basketball. And now, Xu Jingyu believes that Huo Nan's article on the men's basketball team is also inappropriate, and believes that this behavior is unfair.
Huo Nan responded that his remarks were based on concerns and expectations for Chinese basketball, not individuals. He also said that Xu Jingyu's article also has some problems, and the efforts of the Chinese men's basketball team should not be completely repudiated.
The incident reflects the need for basketball commentators to be fair and objective in their dealings with players and teams, and to avoid making aggressive remarks because of personal feelings. At the same time, it also reminds fans to look at basketball games and players rationally, and not to attack others because of momentary emotions.