This article was only published in today's headlines, not released on any other platform, the original is not easy, plagiarism, washing will be deeply studied.
"If the house is vacant, should the property fee be paid?" -- Breaking through traditional thinking and solving dilemmas
In recent years, the mainland has been urbanized by leaps and bounds, and the homeownership rate of urban households has reached 96%, while the proportion of households owning two or more houses in their names has also reached 41.5%. However, with this comes a thought-provoking question: Do vacant homes still have to pay strata fees? The issue has sparked widespread controversy, and on a personal level, many owners do not believe that they should bear the cost.
They believe that after all, they do not live in the community, cannot enjoy property services, and have no direct impact on the community environment. However, from a long-term perspective, maintaining the payment of property fees is essential for the rational allocation of resources.
This year, the relevant departments issued new regulations, which clearly state that as long as the property company provides relevant services in accordance with the agreement and regulations, all owners are obliged to pay the property fee. That is, property fees are indispensable regardless of whether the house is inhabited or not. The following three points will explain why for you.
First, property companies need to remain profitable. Property companies are not charities, and their motivation for providing services is the owner's property fee. If there are a large number of vacant houses in a community that do not need to pay property fees, the operating conditions of the property company will decline significantly. This will result in the property company being reluctant to serve the neighborhood anymore, resulting in the popularity of neighborhoods with high occupancy rates and alienation of neighborhoods with high vacancy rates. As a result, social contradictions will gradually intensify.
Secondly, even if you do not live in it, you can enjoy property services. Property services are wide-ranging, covering all aspects, from community cleaning to facility maintenance, without affecting the preservation and appreciation of the property.
For owners who buy a property but don't move in, value preservation and appreciation are also key. Without property services, the community environment and facilities will not be properly maintained and property values will be affected. Therefore, even if the house does not have occupants, the services provided by the strata company are required.
Finally, property fees help stabilize house prices. Mainland housing prices have soared in the past two decades, in part because speculators are hoarding large amounts of properties, resulting in short supply and pushing up prices. These speculators do so in part because they are able to hold these properties at low cost.
However, if vacant houses do not need to pay property fees, this will further stimulate speculation and exacerbate market instability. Considering the current downward trend of the property market, if the property fee for vacant houses is not charged, the phenomenon of house speculation may be more serious. Therefore, the collection of property fees is necessary to stabilize house prices.
In summary, the collection of strata fees is necessary regardless of whether the house has occupants or not. From the perspective of property company profitability, service outside of residence, and stable housing prices, the payment of this fee is of great significance to society and individuals.
We should get rid of the shackles of traditional concepts, look at this issue with a more open perspective, and contribute to the sustainable development of cities.
Previous Articles:
"The national property market has dropped prices, and buying a house is hesitant?" Don't be fooled by superficial phenomena, grasp these 3 trends so you can really make informed decisions!
"Challenging the future and rationally dealing with vacancy and property fees"
As the pace of urbanization accelerates on the mainland, the homeownership rate has climbed to 96%, and the proportion of households in cities owning two or more properties is as high as 41.5%.
However, in this context of such a high level of development, the question arises: should those vacant houses still be included in the collection of property fees? The issue has been widely debated, with different positions emerging, from individual interests to overall resource allocation, compounding the issue.
This year, the relevant authorities issued new regulations, making it clear that as long as the property company provides services in accordance with the regulations, the owner needs to bear the corresponding property fee. Whether the house is vacant or not, the payment of strata fees has become a statutory obligation.
But what is the rationale behind this provision? The following three considerations may solve the mystery for us.
First of all, the normal operation of the property company requires a certain source of income. Property companies are commercial entities that provide services while maintaining their own operations. If vacant houses are exempted from strata fees, it will reduce the working capital of the strata company, thus affecting the quality and scope of the services it provides. In the long run, this may lead to property companies cutting services, which in turn will affect the overall environment and living experience of the community.
Second, property services continue even when the house is vacant. Property services are not just for occupants, they cover all aspects of the community, from cleaning to facility maintenance, all related to the value of the property. For those owners who buy an investment home and have not moved in temporarily, the importance of property services cannot be ignored. Without careful maintenance of the property, the home may be at risk of depreciation, which in turn will affect the return on investment in the future.
Finally, maintaining the stability of the real estate market is also a factor to consider. Over time, house prices have been on an upward trend, and the active activity of speculators is a reason that cannot be ignored.
If vacant homes are not subject to strata fees, renters may be bolder in storing their properties, further affecting the balance of the market. A stable real estate market is an important guarantee for the healthy development of the city, so the collection of property fees can also be regarded as a means to curb house speculation.
To sum up, although there is an obvious contradiction between individual position and overall development on this issue, from multiple dimensions, the collection of property fees seems to be more conducive to the long-term stability of society. As owners, we may need to look at the development of society as a whole and realize that individual efforts will ultimately build a more prosperous and harmonious city.
So, back to the beginning of the question, should I pay the property fee? Perhaps we can think rationally, integrate personal choices into the overall situation, and contribute to the sustainable development of cities.
Previous Articles:
"The national property market has dropped prices, and buying a house is hesitant?" Don't be fooled by superficial phenomena, grasp these 3 trends so you can really make informed decisions!
This article was only published in today's headlines, and it is forbidden to reprint it on other platforms. Please respect the fruits of the original creator's labor and create a good creative atmosphere together.