The material in this article comes from the Internet, if it is inconsistent with the actual situation or there is infringement, please contact to delete.
Mid-range mobile phones are already equipped with 240W fast charging, why don't high-level people use them?
It has to be said that in addition to iPhone users, users of other mobile phone brands also need fast charging. After all, now that fast charging has become popular, most users can't go back when they run out. Therefore, manufacturers are very concerned about fast charging. The pursuit of speed is getting higher and higher. Recently, realme released the flagship model GT5, which uses a fast charge of up to 240W, which can charge 20% of the battery in more than a minute.
Such a charging speed refreshes many people's cognition of fast charging, but some people may ask why super fast charging above 200W is so good, and why is it used on mid-range mobile phones? Is it because it's bad, so the top models don't use it? This question is interesting and should be studied in depth.
In high-end flagship models, fast charging should give way to other configurations
First of all, we need to know that the overall charging speed of today's top cruise horses is actually not slow. For example, the Xiaomi Mi 13 Ultra Edition has achieved 90W fast charging. It only takes 34 minutes to fully charge, although there is certainly no limit to fast charging above 200W, but this charging speed is definitely enough. So strictly speaking, there are only two manufacturers today that do not have fast charging, one is Apple, limited by the old interface, and the other is Samsung, it is estimated that it is afraid of being bombed. The attention is not small.
Why not use fast charging with more than 100 watts? In fact, manufacturers consider many factors, and the main factor considered by the top leading products is not cost, but more attention to the user's experience and needs. So what are the needs of advanced users? Perhaps the major mobile phone manufacturers have given the answer, that is, battery life. Compared with faster and faster charging, battery life is obviously more important, so flagship models favor large batteries.
At the same time, because high-end flagships use much more materials than mid-range mobile phones, the requirements for internal space are also much higher, so the heat generated by faster fast charging must have higher body heat dissipation materials. However, due to the tight internal space of the top flagship models, the heat generated by fast charging cannot be collected. If the temperature is too high, it will undoubtedly be detrimental to the experience.
In addition, the advantages of high-end flagships in configuration such as image modules are obviously much greater, so fast charging will naturally give way to other configurations.
Different market positioning and user concerns have led to differences in fast chargingAs we said above, the actual charging speed of the current high-end cruise horse is not slow, and many are sufficient. In addition, fast charging itself has obvious side effects. Even a 240W fast charge can fully charge the phone battery in 10 minutes. But 120W fast charging can't slow down for a few minutes, I believe most people don't care about waiting a few more minutes. Therefore, the low charging speed and large capacity battery make many flagship mobile phone users have no so-called battery life worries at all.
Of course, there is also a counterexample to this, and that is the hardcore gaming phone. Take the Red Magic 8S Pro+, for example. Although it is definitely a high-end phone for this price point, it also comes with a 165W fast charge, and the reason is that the users who buy this phone are big gamers, and playing games consumes a lot of power, so it is not enough to have it. With a large battery and fast charging, the Red Devil 8S Pro+ is a durable phone. The gaming phone is completely in place for both heat dissipation and stacking materials, and even equipped with an active cooling fan, so you don't have to worry about the problem of the phone heating.
Here we can conclude that different mobile phone users actually have different needs for mobile phone fast charging, and manufacturers also create fast charging according to the needs of their potential customers. At the same time, there is also a saying among ordinary consumers that fast charging is easy to damage the battery. People familiar with mobile phones certainly know that this is a rumor, but this has become the consensus of many consumers.
Therefore, manufacturers have to consider more about the fast charging of high-end flagships, for fear of affecting their own reputation, and they have also developed a lot of new technologies to extend the life of mobile phone batteries, such as the realme GT5 we mentioned above. Adopt upgraded long-lasting fast charging. After 1600 complete charge and discharge cycles, the effective capacity of the battery can reach more than 80%. Based on charging twice a day, the battery can last for about 3 years.
In addition, different charging methods have been developed for different users. For example, when many models are charged for a long time at night, the mobile phone will automatically switch to slow charging to ensure a healthier charging of the mobile phone and further protect the life of the mobile phone battery.
In general, there is a reason why the top flagship machine does not have the top fast charge. This is not only a trade-off between different products by manufacturers, but also a trade-off between superior stacking and internal space management. In addition, users who buy mid-range phones have higher requirements for long-term performance release, so they need faster charging. On the contrary, users who buy high-end flagship phones pay more attention to other aspects of the experience, which also creates high-end models. Billing function differentiation status.
Disclaimer: The above content and materials are derived from the Internet, and the author of this article does not intend to target or allude to any real country, political system, organization, race, or individual. The above does not mean that the author of this article endorses the laws, rules, opinions, behaviors in the article and is responsible for the authenticity of the relevant information. The author of this article is not responsible for any problems arising above or related to the above and does not assume any direct or indirect legal liability.
If the content of the article involves the content of the work, copyright images, infringement, rumors or other problems, please contact to delete. Finally, if you have any different ideas about this event, welcome to leave a message in the comment area to discuss!