Before reading this article, please click "Follow", which is convenient for you to discuss and share, and can bring you a different sense of participation, thank you for your support!
Against the background of the repeated escalation of the Taiwan Strait crisis, the actions of the United States have a considerable impact on the direction of resolving the Taiwan issue, but at this juncture, the US-led NATO has made a high-profile statement: no force is allowed to take Taiwan. This remark is full of provocation against China, and the way China wants to reunify Taiwan has nothing to do with the United States.
NATO has become the notorious number one anti-China organization under the call of the United States, as a powerful military alliance, NATO's statement on the Taiwan issue is a mass attack to put pressure on China, on the issue of reversing black and white, NATO has repeatedly stigmatized China claiming that China is the biggest threat in the world today, trying to package its own smear of China as a just move.
On July 22 this year, late at night, mainland diplomatic spokesperson Hua Chunying responded with righteous and stern remarks to this blurred line of sight, using only one picture to convey to the public the criminal acts accumulated by NATO around the world, and using four sonorous and powerful rhetorical questions to the United States to leave him speechless. So what does Hua Chunying's attitude express about China's view of NATO?
Rhetorical question about NATO, the war machine
First, she pointed to NATO's long-term assessment of the mainland, saying, "Does China have a coercive policy?" And took out NATO's comparison with the mainland to explain: "Isn't NATO always pulling gangs and factions to carry out military operations?" "NATO really has nothing to say under the attack of bloc politics, and China, which has always stressed independence and self-determination, has never asked other countries to stand on the same side with China.
Second, she said: "Is China subverting the international order? He also cited NATO's large-scale wars around the world: "Isn't NATO violating international norms causing hundreds of millions of people to suffer deeply?" "NATO must pay the price under the firm facts of war, and in fact China is one of the countries that has suffered military attacks from NATO.
Finally, Hua Chunying pointed out that "Chinese has not forgotten a debt owed by NATO to the Chinese Embassy in Yugoslavia", which is precisely a legitimate reason to warn NATO that China has full retaliation. According to the long-term strategy of the United States to expand its power in the Asia-Pacific region, Hua Chunying said that "Asia-Pacific countries do not welcome the arrival of the war machine", and categorically stated that the ultimate purpose of NATO's intervention in Asian affairs is to launch war.
Finally, she mentioned that "Asia's small NATO will create bloc confrontation or a new type of cold war and other threats", in fact, the United States' commitment to establishing military relations with many Asian countries has formed a geopolitical trend of encircling China, with the alliance between Japan and South Korea in the northeast, and India and the Philippines on the left and right.
NATO is blatantly working against China, and even has the face to claim that China is threatening the survival of other countries, can NATO say who China is threatening and who is nakedly targeting China? NATO's thief's practice of clamouring to catch thieves is not only to impose the hat of "harm theory" on China's head, but NATO, which is indomitable in waging wars, has even exposed its true face of aggression and greed.
Hua Chunying released a picture covering the US bombing in Yugoslavia, Afghanistan, Iraq and Libya, in fact, these four countries have suffered more than that, and their hatred with NATO is no less shallow than the blood debt between China and NATO.
Breaking the peace and massacring civilians
Now known as Serbia, the former Federal Republic of Yugoslavia suffered a 78-day NATO bombing campaign, which is still an eternal pain in the hearts of the Serbian people. The 78-day Yugoslav night seemed like day in the explosions, but the hearts of the people fell into eternal night, at least 40,000 houses were reduced to rubble, more than 2,500 civilians died, and more than 1 million people lost their homes.
While wantonly bombing Yugoslavia, NATO is still doing everything to humiliate the country, the bombing of the national television station caused the death of 16 staff members, the world has no way to learn from the mouth of Yugoslavia the inhuman crimes committed by NATO in this country, and NATO's purpose is to strangle the country in silence.
In addition to the indelible mental pain, the 15 tons of depleted uranium bombs dropped by NATO on the country are still endangering the lives and health of the local people, and these radioactive materials will remain in Serbia. Local doctors have already concluded the worst in a large number of clinical responses, and tumors are increasingly appearing in the younger generation in Serbia.
The purpose of the indiscriminate bombing of Yugoslavia was only to open up convenient channels to Middle Eastern countries, so that the original Yugoslavia could be destroyed and a new puppet state was established under the will of NATO. But what is the inevitable connection between child deaths caused by NATO's use of indiscriminate bombing and the former? To this day, the "why" posed by the Serbs has not received an answer.
In this horrific bombing campaign, not only did Yugoslavia suffer unprecedented devastation, but also three Chinese journalists lost their lives, and in the face of the shameful humiliation and bloody reality of the three bombs, NATO was able to shamelessly claim that it was just a mistaken, but this became a hatred that could not be dissipated in Chinese hearts.
In the face of such heinous NATO actions, the demonstrations against NATO atrocities were the anger and resentment of young people in the nineties, and in the face of such heinous NATO actions, Chinese had the same question in the minds of the Yugoslavs as to why the earth-destroying military operation was being carried out in this country, and what NATO should explain for those who lost their innocent lives as a result.
Thirteen countries in the NATO alliance were directly involved in the inhumane bombing campaign, but no one has publicly apologized for it. The United States, as the culprit, must bear the main culprit, and even more shameful are those countries that seek to escape trial under the patronage of the United States, NATO is a snake-rat organization, an unjust military alliance that is causing incalculable damage around the world.
Three years after the bombing of Yugoslavia, the same tragedy was repeated in Iraq. The strategy of attacking Iraq began to take shape as early as 2001, and there are a large number of facts to show that the United States is launching a so-called "anti-terrorism" war against Iraq under the guise of 911, and in order to stand on the moral high ground, the United States unilaterally stated that Iraq has the crime of manufacturing nuclear weapons and weapons of mass destruction.
Although this conclusion has been answered in the negative by several American politicians, the plan to attack Iraq has not stopped it. Facts have shown that the United States has only one goal: to achieve hegemonic expansion. The removal of the powerful Saddam Hussein regime has nothing to do with counterterrorism and the creation of weapons of destruction, and the ultimate intention of the United States is to manipulate Iraq to obtain abundant oil resources.
The United States was caught off guard by air strikes that opened the curtain on the Iraq war, but more unfortunate than Serbia, this nightmare was mired by the Iraqi people for 18 years, and up to 1.2 million civilians were killed, directly returning Iraq's economy to the level of the last century, and millions of people still live in uncertainty.
The unprovoked war launched by the United States has destroyed Iraq at any cost to force its country, and the most notorious is its slaughter of civilians, in fact, these soldiers do not need to do this, but the war has completely poisoned their psychology, Iraqis are no longer a human being in the same sense as them, but a prey or target aimed at machine guns.
Iraq was innocently shot because of 911, but Afghanistan, the initiator of 911, suffered an even more violent impact. In the 20 years of the Afghan war, an average of thousands of civilians have been killed every year, and the territory of Afghanistan is only ruins and battlefields, civilians cannot maintain even the most basic right to survival, and a mediocre air strike can brutally kill civilians, and countless children have died as a result.
And when the US military withdrew from Afghanistan in 2021, in the face of the pleading civilians, they still chose to shoot mercilessly, every US military has Afghan blood on their hands, the hatred between the two countries certainly exists, but the lives of civilians are regarded by them as ants, and the US military who shoots at the weak is simply inferior.
The United States is mired in the Afghan war can be described as thankless, while consuming a large amount of military power, it also lays hidden dangers for the deficit of the national treasury. Why is the shrewd and self-interested United States so obsessed? Just as war paralyzes their soldiers, the United States has been deluding itself into waiting for the war in Afghanistan to turn around, whether or not Afghanistan is ultimately manipulated by the United States, but the United States' goal of deterring Middle Eastern countries has been achieved.
And in North Africa, an oil-rich country that has not escaped the United States: Libya. NATO's last presence in Libya was in 2011, when NATO took advantage of the country's civil war to profit from the looting and bombardment of Libyan national television and embassies.
Times are progressing, but NATO seems to be forever mired in the post-Cold War power mentality, the air strikes in Libya are the same replica of what happened to Yugoslavia, and the United States is only perfunctory with the reply of "accidental bombing". The rise to power of the pro-American regime after the fall of Libya heralds a long-term entanglement between the country and the United States, and NATO is looking for its next target.
Judging from NATO's actions over the years, unprepared air strikes often preemptively put the attacked country into a situation where it cannot fight back, followed by indiscriminate massacres just began, and the proudly returned home after the war left only a piece of wreckage and unbearable pain for the local people.
Interference in Taiwan? China expressed its position
Now NATO's practice of talking about the Taiwan issue has sent a rather dangerous signal to China, the force behind the United States to contribute to Taiwan is the entire NATO alliance, China is not unable to fight, but history has proved to us, no matter whether a country is strong or weak, when the enemy is the world's most powerful military bloc, this country must be ready to burn jade.
As strong as Afghanistan and Iraq, it is precisely because of their proud oil and booming regimes that they have attracted the dissatisfaction of the United States, while Yugoslavia and Libya, to the second extent, have no way to fight back, and can only become puppets of the United States. China is more powerful than these four countries, so will NATO not easily attack the mainland?
This conclusion has always been doubtful, because it is not China that wants to answer this question, but NATO, which is good at taking the lead in attacking, and it is unreasonable to talk about countries that do not pay attention to international rules at all and arbitrarily wage war on their own. NATO's claim that it will not allow the military takeover is already interfering in China's internal affairs, and if the mainland really moves towards the road of military unification, it must consider whether NATO will participate and whether it will have the strength to fight with one after its participation.
In fact, Ms. Hua Chunying said several years ago that today's China is not the China of 120 years ago, nor is it one of the persecuted Middle Eastern countries, and the great powers' attempts to open China's doors through artillery will not be repeated in China, and those with bad intentions will eventually suffer because of it.
In addition to China's strength not allowing NATO to run amok on the mainland, the Taiwan issue is different from the above countries' experience of touching NATO's interests. These countries are more or less related to the oil that Western countries attach great importance to, which is why the United States can respond, and Taiwan is completely China's internal affairs, as long as it does not want to offend China, no country will easily seek its own death.
South Korea and India are typical of the two sides, Japan is arrogant but its military is not developed, the economy of the Philippines is not even as good as the first three countries, these countries want to cooperate to attack China can only depend on how determined the United States is to separate from China.
epilogue
After reviewing a debt that NATO owes to the people of the world for so many years, the cruelest thing is the trampling on life and the destruction of peace, the desire for war erodes not only the hearts of soldiers but also affects a country's foreign strategy, in fact, the United States has become terminally ill, although the strength of the United States is far less than that of the late nineties, but his tiger eyes still make the world nervous.
Will China, as a country openly listed as an adversary by the United States, one day be targeted by NATO? And will Taiwan, as a sensitive area for China, be listed by NATO as the next point of attack? Whether or not the United States and NATO will hinder China's reunification, China is no longer a small country to be slaughtered by, and the mainland will eventually use its strength to make war-loving countries pay a price in blood.