recently
A netizen named "Su Li"
Real-name report that well-known host He Jiong owes nanny wages
A civil judgment was also posted
The netizen called his sister Su Yu
He Jiong's mother has been taking care of him for nearly 3 and a half years
but was dismissed and owed wages
This information came online after it came to light
Some netizens questioned the whistleblower:
"Do you have evidence for Teacher He to do things every day?"
He replied
"All have been submitted, and the court of first instance has decided."
The content of the whistleblower's report at the moment
It is no longer visible on his personal account page
But he posted a civil verdict on the afternoon of September 6
The verdict shows:
The defendant He Jiong shall be on the effective date of this judgment
Pay plaintiff Su Yu within 10 days on March 2, 2019
The compensation for the period up to June 5, 2022 is $149147
Plaintiff Su Yu's other claims were dismissed
On the morning of September 7
The whistleblower is again on social platforms
Publication of part of the judgment
As of now
He Jiong did not respond publicly
He Jiong was reported in his real name for owing the nanny's salary
When it comes to social equity, there should be a response to the doubt
Extreme News commentator Qu Jing
Because the whistleblower's expression is somewhat emotional, some of them are similar to "three and a half years without paying wages", "indiscriminately dismissing the nanny", "causing the nanny to cut off water and food", etc., contrary to general cognitive common sense, if it is a normal employment relationship, even if the employer does not pay wages for three months, I am afraid that the nanny will not do it, why can it persist for three years? The relationship between the nanny and the employer is generally a labor relationship, and the employer has the right to dismiss the nanny, but the dismissal is not at fault, and may need to pay certain economic compensation, what does this "indiscriminate" mean? Moreover, the employer only provides a job for the nanny, and cannot take care of all her life, which leads to her "water and food", which is also somewhat difficult to understand.
There are many doubts, coupled with He Jiong's image in the eyes of the public is very good, and he has always been considered a representative of "high emotional intelligence" and "good old people" in the entertainment industry, so many netizens are skeptical of this revelation.
However, then, the whistleblower posted part of the civil judgment, which showed that the defendant He Jiong should pay plaintiff Su Yu 149147 yuan in compensation for the period from March 2, 2019 to June 5, 2022 within 10 days from the effective date of this judgment, and dismissed the plaintiff Su Yu's other claims. Since the published civil judgment is not comprehensive, it can only be roughly seen that the compensation given to Su Yu by He Jiong is actually calculated according to the average annual salary of urban private unit residents in Hunan Province as the standard for three years' wages. From a legal point of view, non-payment of wages under the contract does exist, but it does not involve compensation, but only needs to be made up.
This is very strange, with He Jiong's social status and income level, even if he weighs the pros and cons utilitarianly, he should not risk damaging his own image and getting involved in legal disputes for the sake of nearly 150,000 yuan in salary. In civil disputes, there are often some complicated legal relationships, complex case facts, and unclear rights and obligations, so it is difficult to systematically know the full picture of the incident based on a two-page judgment alone. Moreover, if the law has already ordered He Jiong to pay compensation, indicating that the nanny concerned has protected her rights and interests through legal channels, then why come to the Internet to break the news? Did He Jiong not implement the legal judgment, or was the party angry and wanted to conduct a "public opinion trial" against him in this way?
Although this incident may seem like a private dispute over the hiring of a nanny, it is not entirely unrelated to the public interest. Caring for patients with Alzheimer's disease for many years is a very heavy and menial job, in addition to making money, it also requires love and patience. If the nanny really works hard and He Jiong owes him wages for a long time, then He Jiong is obviously inconsistent with the gentle, kind, and empathetic public image he has created for a long time, which will disappoint many viewers who have supported and loved him for a long time.
The self-cultivation of literary and artistic workers is not only a personal matter, the quality of literary and artistic style will affect the entire cultural field and even the ecology of social life, which is why various events related to star artists, even private disputes, will attract widespread attention. The public always expects that all star artists can "learn virtue before art, and be a person before art", consciously abide by the law, follow public order and good customs, behave uprightly, and do things innocently.
He Jiong has always been regarded as a "clear stream in the entertainment industry", and at this juncture, he should indeed come out to respond and explain his doubts, which is not only responsible for his own image, but also a social responsibility that he should bear.
Source: Extreme News (commentator: Qu Jing), Dawan News, @苏力