The material in this article comes from the Internet, if it is inconsistent with the actual situation or there is infringement, please contact to delete.
The 2011 "3.11 earthquake" left huge scars in Japan. However, after more than a decade, Japan has repeatedly chosen to persevere in the face of an extremely dangerous decision that could not only destroy Japan itself, but even the world. This begs the question, is this really the way to survive in Japan?
Recently, despite 160,000 signatures, Japan's Tokyo Electric Power Company is determined to carry out a very risky and deeply troubling operation. Although the ground section has been completed, TEPCO plans to begin construction of an undersea drainage for discharging Fukushima's nuclear sewage in mid-April, this week, according to Japanese media reports.
According to TEPCO's plan, they will drain the 1.23 million tons of nuclear sewage currently stored to the seabed one kilometer from the coast through an undersea tunnel for discharge. The emissions plan is expected to last for 30 years, and the cumulative emissions may even reach 700 million tons. However, the head of Greenpeace pointed out that such actions will be devastating to the global marine ecology and fisheries.
It is worth noting, however, that the discharge of nuclear effluent to the seabed is not the only treatment option. Japan's Tepco has previously proposed five different treatment options, including continuing to build water storage tanks, expanding storage capacity, solidifying nuclear sewage and burying it in the ground, discharging nuclear sewage into the atmosphere in the form of water vapor, and discharging nuclear sewage into the ocean after treatment. However, the first two options require the construction of more water storage tanks, which will take up a lot of land and incur high costs, while the method of solidifying buried in the ground presents technical difficulties and uncertainties. In addition, discharging nuclear sewage into the atmosphere may cause panic among the public, so TEPCO believes that the best solution is to discharge the nuclear sewage into the ocean, believing that it is both more hidden and has the lowest cost.
This short-sighted pattern of behavior highlights how often the Japanese think only about immediate needs and ignore the long-term consequences and costs. Even in the face of opposition and criticism from domestic fishermen and the international community, they will not hesitate to stick to their choice. This paranoid attitude has a direct impact on Japan's destiny and future. The problem, however, is that even if they don't want to continue to survive, they shouldn't involve other countries. However, it is deeply disturbing that Japan does not seem to care about this. The seemingly well-mannered country has often gone to extremes in its style, and even the United States has begun to worry about its ally. In recent years, the United States has repeatedly demanded that Japan return more than a hundred tons of nuclear material stored on its territory, enough to make about a thousand nuclear warheads.
So even if the United States believes it can control Japan to some extent, they have to be wary of it. What is even more worrying is that in addition to the 1.23 million tons of nuclear sewage, there is still a large amount of nuclear contaminated waste to be disposed of in Japan. Experts believe that these pollutants with seriously excessive doses are more threatening than nuclear sewage. These included a huge amount of protective clothing, 3,519 boxes of radioactive sludge, 200,000 cubic meters of radioactive rubble, 4 million cubic meters of nuclear-contaminated soil, and a total area of 89 hectares of radioactive wood.
There are two main concerns. First, these radioactive wastes need to be safely stored for at least fifty years to bring radiation levels down to relatively safe levels. However, Japan seems reluctant to dispose of this waste. Should the international community provide assistance and support?
Second, if Japan uses nuclear sewage and radioactive waste as bargaining chips, or even uses them as a pretext to develop nuclear weapons, how should the international community respond? Especially as a neighbor of Japan, should China prepare for the worst?
Analysts believe that with the decline of the United States, the establishment of a global multipolar world order will be full of turbulence and challenges, and it is necessary for China to further adjust its peaceful development strategy. At a time when the world is entering a period of turmoil, and while a peaceful rise is a beautiful slogan, in the current risky international environment, overly optimistic adherence to the belief in peace may put oneself in jeopardy.
In summary, Japan's decision to discharge nuclear sewage has raised concerns around the world. The long-term implications and possible consequences of this decision require careful consideration and assessment. The international community needs missions
Together, we seek solutions to protect the global marine ecology and the future of humanity. Not only Japan, but all countries should put long-term interests first when facing major decisions, carefully weigh the impact of various options, and avoid prioritizing short-term interests over the future of the entire human and planetary ecosystems.
In this era of uncertainty and challenges, the international community needs to strengthen cooperation and deepen mutual understanding in order to address the global issues facing us. As for China, as a neighboring country, it must pay close attention to Japan's actions, not only adhere to its own nuclear security bottom line, but also carefully anticipate possible changes and be prepared for various situations. After all, the maintenance of peace is a shared responsibility of all countries and the basis for achieving sustainable development.
In short, Japan's decision to discharge nuclear sewage has aroused widespread concern and concern around the world. This decision highlights short-sighted and extreme patterns of behavior that pose a potentially huge threat to the future of the world's oceans and humanity. The international community needs to work closely together to develop sustainable solutions to ensure the future of the planet and the common well-being of humanity. In times of uncertainty, all countries should respond cautiously and work together to build a more harmonious world on the basis of peace and stability.
The above content and materials are derived from the Internet, and the author of this article does not intend to target or allude to any real country, political system, organization, race, individual. The above does not mean that the author of this article endorses the laws, rules, opinions, behaviors in the article and is responsible for the authenticity of the relevant information. The author of this article is not responsible for any problems arising above or related to the above and does not assume any direct or indirect legal liability.
Due to the rules of the platform, you will only be recognized as a fan if you have more interaction with me. If you like my article, you can click "Follow", and you can receive the article push as soon as you become an iron fan. This article is only published in today's headlines, please do not move.