India's lunar rover does have a problem with the light source when it comes down from the lander. One is the two areas divided by the red line in the figure, which are obviously different, one side is dimly lit, and the other side is very strong.
Image source network
This question can be distinguished by the naked eye at a glance, not a question of how good and difficult it is to admit how good India is, I just put forward my own opinion, and everyone can help judge together.
Also, to make sure it wasn't a filter that was added to the filter, I looked back at the video posted by ISRO in India on social media, however, this is what it looks like in the video.
Source network
From the video, it can be judged that the sunlight is shining from a low angle from the left to the right. If this is the case, why is the light on the right side significantly stronger than on the left?
This is one, and second, based on this sun's rays and when I looked back at the video, I found a second problem.
When the Indian rover quickly drove downward, the shadow of the solar sails erected by the rover was absent when it drove out of orbit, because there was no shadow directly above the rover, and the shadow did not appear until the rover completely left the orbit used by the lander.
Image source network
I think there is only one possibility that can cause this situation, that is, it is "harmonious" by a stronger light source, which also confirms from the side, there is a stronger light source on the upper right side of the entire picture.
From the strength of the light source falling on the moon surface, it can be judged that it is a light source with a small irradiation area, which may be a light bulb. It is worth noting that this curved light source is obviously still round, and it is possible that there is a cover on the light bulb.
Image source network
This usage was often used in my home when I was a child, why use it?
Spotlight! Spotlight! Spotlight!
Say important things three times, otherwise, the strength of the light source on both sides will not be so obvious.
Everyone found that the farther away from the "Chandrayan-3" lander, the stronger the light, so this light source should not be equipped with the "Chandrayan-3" lander. The lander doesn't always stick out a stick and hang the light bulb far away, does it?
If such an analysis does not raise your doubts about the actual landing of India's Chandrayan-3 on the south pole of the moon, then I suggest you take another look at the video footage of our Jade Rabbit "disembarking".
Source network
When the "Jade Rabbit" got off the lander, the light was strong and orderly. If you think there is also a strong and weak difference, but it is not obvious, then I tell you, it may just be related to the camera.
After the "Jade Rabbit" "got off" to the lunar surface, the picture given by the vista was very evenly distributed in terms of the intensity of its light.
Image source network
In this way, when the two compartments are compared, the problem is not exposed! Obviously we are better, we have achieved lunar soil sampling. Around 2030, we will also achieve a manned lunar landing.
It's not how hard it is to admit how good others are, but how hard is it to admit how good you are?