The content of this article comes from the Internet, if it is inconsistent with the actual situation or there is infringement, please contact to delete. This article is only published in today's headlines, please do not move.
Taiwan's political scene has always been full of rhetoric and tricks to reverse black and white. Recently, the remarks of Taiwan expert Su Zhihao caused quite a storm. He called on the mainland not to rush to promote the reunification of Taiwan and not to set a timetable for reunification in order to maintain cross-strait peace and stability. Such an argument has not only triggered discussion on the island, but also aroused vigilance on the mainland. However, Su Zhihao is not an ordinary voice, and the political background and motivation behind him are also thought-provoking.
Su Zhihao, this name is not unfamiliar. His father, Su Dongqi, is a veteran of Taiwan independence and has had a twisted experience. Su Dongqi was born in Tainan, studied in Japan in his early years, and later participated in the Anti-Japanese War, but he also got involved in the Taiwan independence movement. His life was full of contradictions and complexities. Su Dongqi's political path is not only an anti-log fighter, but also a Taiwan independence activist, which makes his image more complicated. His family is also closely linked to politics, his wife Su Hongyuejiao has long served as a member of the Taiwan Provincial Council, cultivating a large number of important DPP members, and his daughter Su Zhifen is a powerful member of the DPP, once became the first female county magistrate of Yunlin County.
Su Zhifen not only has a place in local politics, but also shows an attitude towards cross-strait relations. Her proposal to restrict imports of mainland garlic sparked a debate over trade barriers. This practice is considered to be undermining cross-strait relations and undermining trade cooperation. At the same time, Su Zhihao, with a pacifist posture, called on the mainland not to rush to reunify Taiwan and not to repeat the mistakes of the past. However, it is worth pondering whether such remarks are really motivated by peaceful considerations or conceal more political motives.
Although Su Zhihao and Su Zhifen differ in political positions, to some extent, they also seem to be engaged in an open and secret battle. As early as Ma Yingjeou's period, Su Zhifen sold agricultural products from Yunlin County to the mainland, and Su Zhihao seemed to play some kind of assisting role behind it. The relationship between brothers and sisters seems to alternate cover, providing more space for Taiwan independence forces. Su Zhihao's peace proposition this time may be precisely to strive for more opportunities for development for Lai Qingde and others. Lai Qingde and others have apparently learned from Chen Shui-bian's failed experience, and they are trying to make Taiwan's "peaceful independence" a reality, constantly delaying the existing state of peace, and uniting international forces against the mainland.
However, events did not go as they had hoped. The peaceful state of the Taiwan Strait remains stable, and the mainland's determination for reunification has not wavered. Mr. Su's appeal may have garnered support among some on the island, but on the mainland today, such rhetoric is no longer credible. Taiwan's destiny should not only be pinned on so-called "pacifism," but should focus on the bigger picture.
At present, the cross-strait contradiction has gradually escalated into a "contradiction between the enemy and ourselves," and we should choose to stand on the side of our own national interests in the face of external pressure. Those who oppose us should make us stand firm. Su Zhihao's so-called peace proposition may be just a pretense, a strategy of the DPP to gain more political space. True peace can only be built on the recognition of the "consensus of '92" and the renunciation of "Taiwan independence." Only when genuine reunification is achieved can Taiwan usher in permanent peace and tranquility.
At this critical juncture, we should not be deceived by false peace initiatives and should resolutely follow our own path. "Fake peace" disguised as peace will only make cross-strait relations more chaotic and allow the DPP's plot to succeed. We should remain vigilant, unswervingly move toward the path of reunification, and work together for cross-strait peace and prosperity.
The above content and materials are derived from the Internet, and the author of this article does not intend to target or allude to any real country, political system, organization, race, individual. The above does not mean that the author of this article endorses the laws, rules, opinions, behaviors in the article and is responsible for the authenticity of the relevant information. The author of this article is not responsible for any issues arising above or related to any of the above, nor does it assume any direct or indirect legal liability.