In order to promote talents, capital and technology to the countryside, rapidly improve the construction of new countryside, and develop with high quality. Recently, nine departments jointly issued the "My Hometown I Build" Activity Implementation Plan.
The plan clearly states that it is encouraged to guide retired servicemen to return to their hometowns and settle down to become good industrial development instructors, village-level affairs supervisors, social conditions and public opinion information officers, and village construction think tanks, and provide "green channels" for qualified retired soldiers, their children, spouses, parents and other close relatives in kindergarten enrollment, employment and medical treatment, and elderly care and hospital admission.
The plan proposes to mobilize capable people to return to their hometowns for construction. Guide professionals, economic experts, cultural celebrities, celebrities and other capable people with good conduct, ability, influence, prestige, and enthusiasm for hometown construction to return to their hometowns to participate in construction. Improve the service system of counties, townships and villages, so that more capable people in the village want to do things, can do things, can really do things, and do things, so that more people who can do things outside want to come back, come back, stay and do well. Encourage and guide retired cadres, retired teachers, retired doctors, retired technicians, retired soldiers, etc. to return to their hometowns and settle down, and become good industrial development instructors, village-level affairs supervisors, social conditions and public opinion information workers, and village construction think tanks. Hire a group of prestigious, fair-minded returnees as neighborhood conflict mediators, and actively explore working methods such as "resolving cases in packages."
The formulation of these policies has provided a guarantee for upgrading rural construction to a new level and taking new steps in high-quality rural development.
First of all, the problem of "water and soil disobedience" in management has been solved. Generally speaking, the cadres who go out of the village have a certain prestige among the villagers, plus they are natives and elders, and they are familiar with the neighbors and neighbors, and it is easy to gain the trust and understanding of the villagers, and it is much easier to carry out work in the later stage.
Secondly, the cadres who go out of the village are relatively familiar with the situation in the village, coupled with their own professional expertise, have worked outside for many years, have learned a lot, have accumulated rich experience, have certain social resources, and the development ideas and plans formulated are more "down-to-earth" and more in line with the actual development situation of the village.
Finally, the cadres who go out in these villages, after all, after many years of formal training, study and hard work, can they gain a foothold outside, work methods, work ability, and awareness of the rule of law are naturally higher than ordinary villagers, and the depth of understanding of the policies of the higher level of government and the degree of implementation will be improved, providing new concepts and ideas for rural standardized management, rule of law management, and modern management, and improving governance efficiency.
The question then is whether the cadres who went out of these villages are willing to return? Should be willing. Everyone hopes that their hometown will be good and contribute to the construction of their hometown.
However, compared with rural areas, cities have more convenient living facilities and a more developed medical security system. Cities have easier access to a variety of community services and medical resources, as well as a variety of social activities and cultural entertainment options.
If there is no institutional guarantee, these cadres return to their hometowns for construction, sometimes without the understanding and support of the villagers, and the work is often "thankless". Therefore, more cadres who have gone out in the village are reluctant to return, and at most "donate money and materials" to express some wishes.
If there is policy support and institutional guarantee, some reasonable life and practical problems at work can be solved. With the improvement of living conditions in rural areas, it is believed that more cadres are willing to return to their hometowns to participate in construction. The countryside just got better.