More than 400 foreign pilots moved to China en masse and decided to contribute to China's aviation industry.
The incident has raised concerns about the pilot shortage China has long faced.
400 pilots jumped to China en masse and threatened never to return home! Vowing to "serve" China?
Becoming a pilot requires rigorous physical, vision, mental health assessments, and professional knowledge.
Upon entering the Aviation Academy, students will receive "devilish training" in physical training, anti-vertigo training and flight theory.
China's aviation industry is developing rapidly, but it still faces a shortage of pilots.
In order to solve this problem, China began to introduce foreign pilots to inject new blood into China's aviation industry.
One of the main reasons why foreign pilots choose to move to China is the lucrative salary.
In China, foreign pilots can earn higher salaries and career development opportunities than in their home countries.
Foreign pilots are also aware of the potential and prospects of China's aviation industry.
China has become one of the important markets for the global aerospace industry, and Chinese airlines are also growing.
China is promoting the development and production of domestically produced aircraft and accelerating independent innovation in the aviation industry.
China still needs to strengthen the training of local pilots to meet the needs of the rapidly developing aviation industry.
Training local pilots can reduce reliance on foreign pilots and increase the autonomy and competitiveness of China's aviation industry.
The addition of foreign pilots has injected new vitality and international elements into China's aviation industry.
They bring rich experience and different cultural backgrounds, which bring new opportunities and challenges to the development of China's aviation industry.
This also reminds us that China needs to continue to increase the training and support of local pilots to make more contributions to the sustainable development of the aviation industry.
The Chinese government and relevant institutions should strengthen cooperation with aviation academies, provide more funding and resources, and provide a better pilot training environment for local students.
The reform of the aviation academy should be promoted, practical teaching should be strengthened, and students' practical skills and adaptability should be cultivated.
The government can also set up a scholarship scheme to attract more promising young people to pursue careers in aviation.
By strengthening the training of local pilots, China can reduce its dependence on foreign pilots and improve the autonomy and competitiveness of the aviation industry.
At the NATO summit, when Zelensky signed the document, China's earlier reminders were in vain
Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky refused to shake hands with the NATO Secretary General at the NATO summit, a move that caused concern and speculation from the outside world.
It is widely believed that Zelensky's refusal to shake hands expresses Ukraine's dissatisfaction with the inability to join NATO.
Ukraine has been trying to join NATO since the outbreak of the Crimean crisis in 2014 for more security guarantees and international support.
Due to Russia's opposition and the disagreements of Western countries, Ukraine has been unable to achieve this goal.
Zelensky has repeatedly asked US President Joe Biden about the specific time of joining the treaty, which once again highlights Ukraine's desire to join NATO.
Ukraine hopes to receive clear support and commitment from Western countries to counter the Russian threat.
Zelensky's move also raised accusations of German inaction on Ukraine.
Germany has long been seen as taking a relatively moderate stance on Ukraine, favoring good relations with Russia.
Zelensky's accusations show that Ukraine is dissatisfied with Germany's inaction in resolving the Ukrainian issue and hopes that Germany can participate more actively and provide more support and help to Ukraine.
Despite the many challenges and difficulties facing Ukraine, Zelensky signed an important document.
This document is a joint framework agreement between Ukraine and NATO, supported by the G7 countries.
The G7 will provide long-term assistance to Ukraine, including military equipment, intelligence sharing and cyber defense.
The agreement calls for internal reforms in Ukraine, including the judiciary and military system.
The signing of this agreement is undoubtedly an important milestone for Ukraine, marking the further deepening and expansion of cooperation between Ukraine and Western countries.
Zelensky also proposed making English the language of international communication in Ukraine and changing the date of Christmas celebration.
These proposals are considered an attempt to strengthen Ukraine's ties and image with Western countries.
The proposals have also sparked controversy and opposition.
These changes may adversely affect Ukraine's national identity and traditional values, leading to the erosion of Ukraine's culture and identity.
China's reminders are in vain
China also recognizes the conflict and challenges facing Ukraine and calls on all parties to avoid escalating the conflict into a full-scale war.
China believes that Ukraine needs to rely on its own strength to solve the problem, and self-reliance is the only way out for Ukraine.
As a responsible major country, China will continue to make its own contributions to maintaining international and regional peace and stability.
800,000 U.S. troops enter the highest combat readiness, the target is China, if the war starts, the PLA can win
According to the latest information, 60% of the active duty forces of the US military are in the highest combat readiness and can be deployed anywhere in the world at any time.
There are also 10% of active duty units with higher combat readiness and can be ready for combat within 96 hours.
These statements clearly state that the US military feels serious about the threat to China and is ready to deal with a possible conflict.
The comprehensive strength of the US military is very strong, not only has a balanced development of navy, land and air force, but also has military strength in many fields such as nuclear weapons, space and cyber forces.
The U.S. military also relies on strong logistical support and military bases around the world, giving it the ability to quickly project troops.
The U.S. military also has some potential weaknesses.
Industrial hollowing out is one of them, and the military-industrial system may collapse due to the transfer of real industries.
The link between the military industry and the civilian industry is very important, and the manufacture of advanced fighters by military enterprises requires civilian manufacturing to provide various accessories.
Strong civilian manufacturing support can reduce the cost of weapons manufacturing and promote the mutual transformation of military and civilian technology.
The hollowing out of industry may affect the equipment manufacturing capacity of the US military, thus having a certain impact on its strength.
Still, the U.S. military has many advantages.
With its strength and logistical support capabilities, it is able to operate on a global scale.
The U.S. military relies on firepower suppression tactics to win through superiority in weapons and equipment.
This tactic can be very effective in the short term, but it can be challenging in a long-term war.
The United States has technology but no industry, while China has strong manufacturing.
China's manufacturing industry can reduce costs and can mass-produce all types of military equipment.
This allows China to acquire weapons at a lower cost and has a large-scale military equipment production capacity.
Manufacturing costs in the U.S. were so high that it even led to the closure of even advanced F22 production lines.
The U.S. defense secretary has tried to scare China with the number of U.S. troops, but that thinking is outdated.
The United States acknowledges that its military equipment has a generational gap with China, and that the U.S. military faces limited combat space around China and the PLA's back to home.
Investing more personnel does not necessarily improve combat effectiveness, but may lead to more casualties.
The speed of U.S. military movements has lagged behind China's.
The time required to liberate Taiwan was very short, and the US military could not respond in time.
This shows that there are bottlenecks in the movement and deployment of U.S. troops, while the Chinese military is able to move more quickly.
In addition to the gap in technology and equipment, the will to fight of the US military may also be inferior to that of the Chinese military.
The Korean War is an example of this, in which the Chinese army showed a resolute will to fight.
The performance of the US military in foreign wars is not satisfactory.
More and more U.S. military members have PTSD (post-traumatic stress disorder), which may also affect their combat effectiveness.
Unlike the Chinese military, the purpose of the US military is not clear.
The Chinese military fights to defend national security, while the purpose of the US military may involve more geopolitical and economic interests, and maintaining global hegemony.
This also gives the Chinese army an advantage in terms of motivation and morale.
Despite the advanced technology and military power of the United States, China's manufacturing advantages, rapid mobilization capabilities, and resolute will to fight all make the Chinese military a worthy adversary.
Unable to force and force, the United States demanded recognition of the results of the South China Sea arbitration with international law, and China responded firmly
The U.S. demand that China recognize the outcome of the arbitration in the South China Sea has drawn a firm response from China.
China believes that the US statement violates the international law of the sea and the UN Charter, and is regarded as interference and provocation in the South China Sea issue.
The Chinese Foreign Ministry responded to the US statement and criticized the US behavior.
The international community has paid extensive attention and discussion to this development.
Some countries use international law as an excuse to exert pressure and interference on China.
China firmly rejects the arbitral tribunal's award and regards it as illegal, invalid and non-binding.
China believes that there are legality and fairness issues in the composition and procedures of the arbitral tribunal, and the award result is unfair to China.
The South China Sea is China's inherent territory, and China has legal and historic sovereignty.
The South China Sea dispute involves complex historical and geopolitical issues that cannot be resolved simply by international law.
China stands for the settlement of disputes in the South China Sea through bilateral negotiations and peaceful settlement. Resolving the South China Sea issue requires the joint efforts of all parties and resolution through dialogue and consultation.
The US position on the South China Sea issue is considered to be based on geopolitical and interest considerations, rather than genuine concern and respect for international law.
China views the U.S. actions as interference in the South China Sea and an attempt to sow discord between regional countries.
China adheres to the position of safeguarding national sovereignty and territorial integrity and resolutely responds to any act that harms its core interests.