On July 14, the Internet celebrity Gayang girl Hui Ran posted a video saying that she would not back down this time and would launch a comprehensive counterattack against her ex-husband Wang Zhiao. In the video, the Gayang girl Hui Ran said that she responded to the questions that everyone was more concerned about.
One, on why not settle through legal proceedings?
Hui Ran responded: There have been attempts to solve the problem through legal channels for a long time. And posted the lawyer's contract and power of attorney, as well as proof of payment invoice.
Second, why has it been unsolvable for a long time? Explain that there are many pressure majeure obstructions suspected of being exclusive.
Hui Ran responded: The release of a recording is what a lawyer said to her, and the general content is that the lawyer said that he could not do anything, thinking that if or, it is suspected, that someone may obstruct it, and if she drags it out and does not deal with her, then their lawyer cannot do anything, there is no way. (Watch out for these hypothetical words)
Therefore, Hui Ran believes that these irresistible pressures may be hindered by her ex-husband Wang Zhiao's relationship, the purpose is that because the child is generally given priority to the mother before the age of two, so find various reasons to delay. On the other hand, Hui Ran is in the negative public opinion, and her ex-husband is using her previous eight million accounts to monetize. In this regard, dragging on from the capital side is very unfavorable to Huiran.
Third, why did the previous essay be deleted and did not make any response to Wang Zhiao's statement?
Hui Ran responded: It was someone who wanted to delete the statement, calm the situation, and post a screenshot of the conversation at that time. But for who is this person and what power? Hui Ran said that he did not dare to say. Only blame herself for being young and not understanding the worldly sinister, being routine, precisely because she listened to this person's request to delete the small essay, which eventually led public opinion to accuse her.
Fourth, why is the wind of online public opinion one-sided?
Hui Ran said that there was evidence that her ex-husband Wang Zhiao bought the water army and exposed her online. And post relevant chat records. According to the water army, on October 6, 2022, he was unintentionally pulled into the water army group, participated in related projects and received a bonus of 6 yuan and 3 Mao, and later he did not want to participate so he quit the group, and now he can't find the group, and the person who transferred him has cancelled his account.
Fifth, Hui Ran said that he gave Wang Zhiao two choices, one is to avoid everyone suspecting that this matter is hype, so both parties cancelled their existing accounts, and both parties solved it privately; The other is to give her the custody of her daughter, give the account to Wang Zhiao, and she doesn't want anything from the company.
Sixth, at the same time, I also warn all netizens not to make unreasonable accusations and create yellow rumors against her and her friend who spoke up for her.
For the many people involved in the above points, it has caused heated discussions among netizens. In particular, the relevant lawyer believes that if the other party to the recording is really a lawyer, then the lawyer may be invited to tea.
Another netizen believes that even if the lawyer is telling the truth, she will only harm the lawyer by using it as evidence.
Some lawyer netizens believe that why not sue to divide the common income during cohabitation (the two are not married)? Because there is a definite practical question, if the custody of the child is given to Huiran, and the maintenance is delayed or not given to her, will she be able to raise the child?
At the end of writing, the editor is skeptical about the so-called lawyer in the second point, believing that Hui Ran is more likely to be fooled, because from the words of the so-called lawyer, what is possible, what if, what or, all are words without substance and evidence.
This is clearly to take money and not do things, and may not even go to say if the department does not deal with it. Many of the people facing customers in this kind of unprofessional law firm, who are called masters nicely, are actually salesmen who do business, and are not lawyers at all.