#头条创作挑战赛#
"It wasn't Durant who went to the Warriors to ruin basketball, but it was Miami where LeBron went first, and it was LeBron who ruined basketball. He thinks he's made basketball better, and I can understand that. His joining the Heat was certainly a great business decision, but I personally like loyalty in the NBA, and LeBron broke the mold! What you know the Warriors destroyed is not basketball, what they destroy is only a genre of basketball, a style, and it is LeBron James who really makes basketball a commercial foil and a utilitarian game! I admit that he is a powerful and unparalleled phenomenal player, but IMHO, if it is to be used great, maybe he really does not deserve it! ”
James can be said to have truly supported more than half of the retired veterans, especially the old teammates, these old players retired and re-employed, and no one can leave James. Because without James, there would be no traffic, and with some of the so-called feelings and fans when they played, they simply couldn't support their poor program ratings!
No, as James' former teammate, former Cavaliers player Iman Shumpert said in a podcast program, saying that Durant and the Warriors are not the culprits that destroyed basketball, their former old teammates, the soul of the Cavaliers, the core of the Lakers James is the root!
I have to say that this word instantly detonated the traffic, after all, he was once a member of the Cavaliers, James's little brother, now he is fighting backwards, shouting for his old rival Warriors, and attacking his teammate James, I have to say that in front of traffic, upside down black and white, ungrateful, backstabbing teammates, these are all small problems, after all, traffic and heat is money, who will not get by with money?
But at the same time, you have to admit that although what he said is suspected of deliberately rubbing the heat, there is still some truth. For example, he said that the Warriors didn't destroy basketball, they destroyed only one of the basketball styles and genres, and whether to choose to shoot three-pointers, shoot mid-circle shots, or choose to hit low backs and then back-up jumpers is a personal choice. The Warriors won three times that year, so they quickly promoted the three-point game to the entire league and even the world basketball. But has basketball changed because of this? No, instead of destroying basketball, the Warriors promoted the game, and even if you put all this aside, you have to become a new generation of young people, many of whom grew up watching the Warriors. Since basketball can be a low-post back shot, it can be an inside line, why can't it be a mid-circle shot, not a three-point shooting.
Secondly, I don't think James' choice is wrong, a professional player's sports career is only more than ten years, even if James is a superstar, it is only more than twenty years, and Cleveland at that time was destined to not win the championship, if James stayed all the time, he would only become the second Malone, his career statistics were brilliant, and he would never win the championship. So James is indeed a supergiant with business, but he was not wrong, he was just a township youth who yearned for a big city, with the Celtics Big Three in front and Durant in the back, how can you say that James ruined basketball? So I still think it's better to be realistic!