There is a question, why do few military fans discuss whether the J-10 can be used as a carrier-based aircraft, while the J-20, as a heavy aircraft, is often discussed together with carrier-based aircraft, hoping to have an accident and change

There is a question, why few military fans discuss whether the J-10 can be used as a carrier-based aircraft, while the J-20, as a heavy aircraft, is often discussed with carrier-based aircraft, hoping for an accident, and after replacing it with standard navigation, it is also hoped that it can be on the ship. Of course, it is good that the J-20 can be on the ship, but it may be larger, and there is no need to mention the J-35, that is, the standard carrier-based aircraft. If the J-10, as one of the main fighters, can get on the ship, it is undoubtedly an imaginary situation, because the J-10 is a single-engine, the thrust is large, the take-off distance is short enough, the Rafale fighter also has a carrier-based version, the engine single thrust is less than the J-10 engine, the two together are not much larger than the J-10, the fuselage is about the same size, the J-10C is slightly longer, so, why is the J-10 not on the ship, or will the J-10 be on the ship in the future?