Conspectus:
Berkeley's New Theory of Vision is a far-reaching philosophical classic that has important implications for the fields of cognitive science, psychology, and philosophy. In this work, Berkeley challenges traditional material realism in an unprecedented way, proposing a completely new perspective on the nature of the world and the nature of consciousness. He argues that the existence of objects depends on our perception and conscious activities, denies the independent existence of the external world, and emphasizes the initiative and constructivity of the subject in the process of perception and cognition.
This paper will explore the implications and implications of Berkeley's New Theory of Vision on cognitive science. First, we will introduce the background and basic ideas of the work, and analyze Berkeley's critique of material realism and his emphasis on subjectivity and constructivity. Second, we will explore the influence of Berkeley's ideas on the field of philosophy. His ideas triggered a rethinking of the nature of the world and the nature of consciousness, inspiring philosophers to think in new ways of thinking about consciousness, existence, and reality.
Next, we will analyze the impact of Berkeley's views on psychology. Traditional psychology believes that perception is a passive process of receiving external stimuli, but Berkeley's view emphasizes the importance of the initiative of perception and the subjective experience of individuals in cognition. We will explore how Berkeley's ideas have prompted psychology researchers to re-examine the subjectivity and relativity of perception, and reveal the role of factors such as attention, expectations, experiences, and goals in perception.
Finally, we will examine the implications of Berkeley's ideas in the field of cognitive science. Berkeley's view emphasizes the initiative and constructivity of subjects in perceptual and cognitive processes, and challenges the independent existence of the external world. We will explore how modern cognitive science has further strengthened the understanding of the constructive and relative nature of cognition, as well as the study of the impact of individual and cultural differences, concepts, and language on cognition.
Through a comprehensive analysis of Berkeley's New Theory of Vision, this paper aims to reveal the influence and enlightenment of this work on cognitive science, and provide a new perspective and theoretical basis for cognitive science research. Berkeley's rethinking of the nature of the world and the nature of consciousness brings profound insights, prompting us to re-examine the nature of perception, cognition, and individual subjective experience, and provides a new way of thinking about our understanding of the world. Through the discussion of this paper, we hope to better understand the impact of Berkeley's ideas on the field of cognitive science, and provide new directions and implications for future research."
I. Introduction
Background:
The New Theory of Vision is an important work by the 18th-century British philosopher George Berkeley and one of his most representative works. First published in 1710, the book presents a very different view from the traditional realist view through its analysis of sight and perception. Berkeley thought deeply about the existence and properties of objects, arguing that they do not exist independently of the observer's consciousness, but are constructed by the observer's perception and experience.
Before Berkeley published The New Theory of Vision, the British philosopher John Locke's Theory of Human Understanding proposed the idea of a "subjective external world", arguing that objects exist in the absence of an observer and have independent properties. Locke's view is called realism, which holds that the material world exists objectively and has nothing to do with our perception and experience.
Berkeley responded to the realist views of Locke and others and made his own claims. He believes that the existence of objects is determined by our perception, that is, "to be is to be perceived". Berkeley pointed out that what we call properties such as shape, color, texture, etc. of objects are not inherent in the object itself, but are the result of mental activity that is perceived and constructed through our senses. He famously said "The Siberian mining region fell in the forest and no one heard, did it make a sound?" to make your point. If no one perceives, then sound doesn't exist.
This view of Berkeley has led to many philosophical reflections on perception, reality, and consciousness. His view challenges the traditional realist view, arguing that understanding the world should start from subjective perception and conscious activity, placing the role of the observer at the center. Berkeley argues that our perceptual experience is the basis for constructing the real world, which is not an objective entity that exists independently. This view proposes a whole new way of thinking about our understanding of the nature of the world and the nature of consciousness.
The New Theory of Vision has had a profound impact on philosophy, psychology, and cognitive science. In the field of philosophy, Berkeley's ideas have inspired questioning realism and pushed thinking about subjectivity and relativity. In the field of psychology, the work provides an important foundation for the study of perception and cognition, prompting deeper exploration of the relationship between the observer and reality. In the field of cognitive science, Berkeley's ideas inspire new ways of thinking about the nature of the world and the nature of consciousness, exploring the limits and possibilities of human cognitive abilities.
In summary, New Theory of Vision, one of Berkeley's most important works, explores philosophical issues in vision and perception, proposing a view that is radically different from the traditional realist view. The book's claims about the existence, perception, reality, and consciousness of objects have profoundly influenced the fields of philosophy, psychology, and cognitive science, bringing new ways of thinking to our understanding of the nature of the world and the nature of consciousness.
Purpose and significance:
This paper aims to systematically analyze the thinking of Berkeley, Locke and others on the existence of the material world, covering related fields such as matter and entity, the existence of God, perception, reality and consciousness. Through an in-depth study of The New Theory of Vision, we can better understand Berkeley's ideas and his challenge to realism, thereby expanding our understanding of the nature of the world and the nature of consciousness.
First, we will explore the discussion of matter and substance in The New Theory of Vision. Berkeley believed that the existence of objects is not independent of our perception and experience, but is determined by our perception. He questioned the views of realists such as Locke and argued that "to be is to be perceived." This leads to reflections on the nature and substance of objects, which leads to questioning and re-evaluation of previous conventional wisdom. We will explore the implications of this perspective for our understanding of the physical world.
Second, we will explore the question of God's existence. In The New Theory of Vision, Berkeley proposed that the existence of objects depends on the existence of God. He argues that God presents objects to us through our perceptions, thus constructing the real world as we know it. This view has introduced new ways of thinking about traditional religious concepts, and has led to in-depth discussions about the existence of God and the relationship between God and reality.
In addition, we will examine Berkeley's perspective on perception and reality. He believes that our perceptual experience is the basis for constructing the real world, and that the real world is not an objective entity that exists independently. He believes that the shape, color, texture and other properties of objects are not inherent in the object itself, but are the result of mental activities perceived and constructed through our senses. We will analyze the impact of this perspective on our perception and perception of reality, and explore the relationship between perception and reality.
Finally, we will examine Berkeley's view of consciousness. He puts the role of the observer at the center and argues that consciousness plays a key role in the construction of reality. His view challenges the traditional realist view of consciousness and proposes a new way of thinking based on subjective perception and conscious activity. We will explore the implications of his views on consciousness for our understanding of the nature of consciousness and discuss the implications for the fields of cognitive science and psychology.
The significance of this thesis is to deeply explore the thinking of Berkeley, Locke and others on the existence of the material world through the analysis and research of "New Theory of Vision", and expand our understanding of the nature of the world and the nature of consciousness. This helps us to have a more comprehensive and in-depth understanding of reality and consciousness, and can also provide new ways of thinking and perspectives for research in fields such as philosophy, psychology and cognitive science. By studying Berkeley's thoughts, we can further explore the limitations and possibilities of human perception and promote the development and progress of related disciplines.
II. The Nature of Matter and Entities
A. Berkeley's view
1. The principle of "being is being perceived"
In The New Theory of Vision, Berkeley famously formulated the principle that "to be is to be perceived." This principle states that the existence of objects is not independent of our perception and experience, but is determined by our perception.
Traditional realists, such as Locke, believe that objects exist in the physical world and that they have realities independent of our thinking and perception. Berkeley, however, takes a different view. He critically examines this idea and makes a more radical claim that the existence of objects depends on our perception and perception.
According to Berkeley's theory, what we call "objects" are simply the result of our perceptions and sensations. When we touch, see, smell, hear, or taste something, we develop perception and perception of that object. Berkeley argues that these perceptions and perceptions constitute our perception and experience of objects. Without our perception and perception, objects cannot exist in our consciousness.
Berkeley used the example of "vision" to illustrate his point. He believes that the objects we see are only the result of visual perception, not independent entities. He questioned whether we could imagine an object devoid of any image, color, or touch at all, and through this questioning, he denied the reality of the object. He believes that the shape, color, texture and other properties of objects are not inherent in the object itself, but are the result of mental activities perceived and constructed through our senses.
With this principle, Berkeley challenges the traditional realist view. He argues that we cannot directly know the nature and properties of objects, and that all we can know is our perception and perception, that is, how we perceive and experience objects. His views emphasize the importance of perception and experience in our understanding of the world.
However, this view has also caused many controversies and questions. Some argue that Berkeley is too radically denying the independent existence of objects and ignoring the objective reality behind them. They believe that the existence of objects does not depend solely on our perception, but independently of our thinking and consciousness.
Berkeley's ideas also provoke deep thinking about the relationship between perception and reality. He argues that our perception and experience of objects is entirely subjective and depends on our ability to perceive and perceive. This makes people start thinking about the relationship between perception and reality, and whether our perception of reality is real and objective.
Despite the controversy, Berkeley's "to be is to be perceived" principle provides new ways of thinking and perspectives in fields such as philosophy, psychology, and cognitive science. It challenges our traditional understanding of the existence and perception of objects, emphasizing the importance of perception and experience in our understanding of the world. The exploration of this principle not only helps us to understand our perception and consciousness more comprehensively, but also helps to promote the development and progress of related disciplines.
2. Properties such as shape, color, texture, etc. of an object are the result of perception
Berkeley believes that the shape, color, texture and other properties of objects are not inherent in the object itself, but are the result of mental activity perceived and constructed through our senses. He illustrates this point using the example of "vision".
According to Berkeley's theory, the objects we see are the result of visual perception, not independently existing entities. He questioned whether we could imagine an object devoid of any image, color, or touch at all, and through this questioning, he denied the reality of the object. He believes that the shape, color, texture and other properties of objects are the result of mental projections constructed by us in the process of perception.
Each of us has our own unique ability to perceive and perceive, so the perception of the same object will also be different. For example, when we see a red rose, we perceive properties such as its color, shape, and texture. But if we are colorblind, we may not perceive red and see it as something else. This shows that the properties of objects are dependent on our perception and perception, and different perceptions and perceptions lead to different attribute projections.
Berkeley also proposed the concept of "secondary properties", that is, the properties of objects are determined by our perception and perception. He argues that objects have no actual shape, color, or texture, and that these properties are just mental phenomena that we project in the process of perception. For example, when we see a silver fish swimming in the water, we perceive properties such as its silver, soft touch, etc. However, if we change the way we perceive, such as through night vision goggles, we may see a black-and-white image that no longer has the properties of silver. This shows that the properties of objects are not fixed, but depend on how we perceive and the conditions of the environment.
In addition, Berkeley proposed the thought experiment of "magic glasses" to further support his ideas about the properties of objects. Suppose we wear a magic pair of glasses that change our visual perception, causing changes in the shape, color, texture and other properties of the objects we see. For example, when we wear this pair of glasses, the originally round object will become square, the red object will turn blue, and so on. This thought experiment illustrates the role of our perception and perception in shaping the properties of objects.
Berkeley's ideas sparked strong controversy at the time. Some believe that he is too radically denying the independent existence of objects, ignoring the objective reality behind them. However, Berkeley's view is also supported by some philosophers and psychologists. They believe that we cannot directly know the nature and properties of objects, all we can know is our perception and perception, that is, how we perceive and experience objects.
Berkeley's ideas have had an important impact on the way we perceive the world. It emphasizes the importance of perception and experience in our understanding of the world and reveals the relationship between perception and reality. According to Berkeley, our perception and perception of objects is entirely subjective and depends on our ability to perceive and perceive. This makes people start thinking about the relationship between perception and reality, and whether our perception of reality is real and objective.
Despite the controversy, Berkeley's idea that properties such as shape, color, texture, and other properties of an object are perceptual consequences has provided new ways of thinking and perspectives in fields such as philosophy, psychology, and cognitive science. It challenges our traditional understanding of the existence and perception of objects, emphasizing the importance of perception and experience in our understanding of the world. The exploration of this perspective not only helps us to understand our perception and consciousness more fully, but also helps to promote the development and progress of related disciplines.
B. Views of Locke et al
1. The independent existence of matter
John Locke was a 17th-century British philosopher who held a different view of the independent existence of matter than Berkeley. Locke believed that objects exist independently of our perception and perception, and that they possess a range of properties and characteristics.
Locke proposed the "ontological" idea that objects existed before we perceived, and that they possess some inherent properties and characteristics. Properties such as shape, color, texture, etc. of an object are not just the result of our perception and perception, but are related to the object itself. Locke believed that these properties exist on the surface of an object, and that we acquire and understand them through perception.
Locke emphasized the reality and objectivity of matter. He argues that matter is an independently existing entity that exists independently of our perception. Whether we perceive them or not, objects still retain their presence and properties. Locke illustrates his point with a simple example: when we leave a room, even if no one is there, the tables, chairs, and other objects in the room are still there, and their attributes such as shape, color, and texture do not disappear.
Locke also proposed the concept that objects are atomic. He believed that an object is made up of a series of atoms, and that these atoms are the basic building blocks of an object. The properties and characteristics of an object are determined by the arrangement and movement of its atoms. Locke's idea of the atom emphasized the reality and divisibility of matter, i.e. objects can be broken down into smaller parts, and these parts retain their properties and characteristics.
Locke also proposed the concept of "sensory data" to explain the source of our perception and perception. He argues that our senses receive a series of sensory data from the outside world and transform this data into what we know through our perceptual processes. These sensory data are derived from the object itself, and they reflect the properties and characteristics of the object. Locke believed that we gain knowledge and understanding of objects through perception and experience.
Locke's view of the independent existence of objects has important implications for science and epistemology. His views emphasize the objective reality and reliability of matter, providing a solid foundation for scientific research. Scientists can obtain objective data about the properties and characteristics of objects through observation, experimentation and measurement, and thus infer the laws and principles of the material world.
Locke's ideas also had a profound impact on epistemology. He emphasized that our perception of reality is based on sensory experience, and that we gain knowledge and understanding of the world through perception and rational thinking. His concept of "sensory data" provides a plausible explanation for our understanding of the process of perception and perception.
However, Locke's views have also faced some criticism. Some philosophers and psychologists believe that Locke places too much emphasis on the independent existence of objects, ignoring the role of our perception and perception in the construction and shaping of reality. They believe that our perception and perception are subjective and influenced by our sensory organs, brain, and cognitive processes. Therefore, the properties of the object that we perceive may not fully reflect the true properties of the object itself.
In general, Locke held a different view of the independent existence of matter than Berkeley. He emphasized the objective reality and independent existence of objects, and believed that objects have a series of properties and characteristics. Locke's ideas have had an important impact on scientific research and epistemology, providing a fundamental framework for understanding the world and acquiring knowledge. However, Locke's views also face some criticism, and there are some differences with those of Berkeley and others. Discussions of the independent existence of objects will continue to drive advances and advances in fields such as philosophy, psychology, and cognitive science.
2. Objectivity of the properties of the object
In Locke's view of the independent existence of matter, he also emphasized the objectivity of the properties of objects. Properties such as shape, color, texture, etc. of an object are not just the result of our perception and perception, but are related to the object itself.
Locke believed that the properties of an object exist on the surface of the object, and that these properties are inherent in the object. Whether we perceive them or not, objects still maintain their presence and characteristics. He gives an example to illustrate this point: when we leave a room, even if no one is there, the tables, chairs, and other objects in the room retain their attributes such as shape, color, and texture.
Locke's view is antithetical to subjective epistemology. Subjective epistemology holds that our perception and perception are influenced by subjective factors, and that the properties of objects may vary depending on the subjective state of the observer. However, Locke believed that the properties of objects exist objectively and that they exist independently of our perception.
Locke further elaborated that objectivity in the properties of objects is achieved through the acquisition of sensory data. He argues that we receive a series of sensory data from the outside world through our senses, and then transform this data into what we know through our perceptual process. These sensory data are derived from the object itself, and they reflect the properties and characteristics of the object. Locke argues that our perception is not entirely subjective, it is built on the basis of sensory data.
Locke's ideas provided an important basis for scientific research. Scientists pursue objective reality and reliability, and they obtain objective data about the properties and characteristics of objects through observation, experimentation, and measurement. Locke's view emphasized the objectivity of the properties of objects, providing a reliable starting point for scientific research. Scientists can conduct empirical research based on Locke's point of view, verify the objectivity of the properties of objects through observation and measurement, and infer the laws and principles of the material world.
In addition, Locke's ideas had a profound impact on epistemology. He pointed out that our perception and perception are based on sensory experience, and we gain knowledge and understanding of the world through perception and rational thinking. Locke's view emphasizes that our perception of reality is based on the properties of objectively existing objects, and is achieved through the acquisition and processing of sensory data. This view provides a plausible explanation for our understanding of the process of perception and perception.
However, Locke's views have also faced some criticism. Some philosophers and psychologists believe that Locke overemphasized the objectivity of the properties of objects, ignoring the role of our perception and perception in the construction and shaping of reality. They believe that our perception and perception are subjective and influenced by our sensory organs, brain, and cognitive processes. Therefore, the properties of the object that we perceive may not fully reflect the true properties of the object itself.
In general, Locke emphasized the objectivity of the properties of objects, arguing that the properties of objects exist in the object itself and do not depend on our perception. His ideas provide a solid foundation for scientific research, where scientists can obtain objective data on the properties and characteristics of objects through observation, experimentation, and measurement. Locke's ideas also had an important impact on epistemology, emphasizing that our perception and perception are based on sensory experience and acquire knowledge and understanding of the world through the acquisition and processing of sensory data. However, Locke's view has also faced some criticism, with some arguing that he places too much emphasis on the objectivity of object properties and ignores the subjective construction of perception and perception on reality. The discussion of the objectivity of the properties of objects will continue to drive development and progress in fields such as philosophy, psychology, and cognitive science.
III. The Existence of God and Berkeley's View
A. Berkeley's theological position
Berkeley was an 18th-century Irish philosopher and theologian known for his subjective idealism. In his theological position, he emphasized views about the existence of God and the nature of the universe. Berkeley believed that real existence could only be determined through perception and experience, and that God was an infinite, omnipotent, and intelligent being.
First, Berkeley firmly believes in the existence of God. He believed that only a God of incomparable perfection and wisdom could explain the existence and operation of the universe. Berkeley believed that the world was created by God and that all things and phenomena were manifestations of God's thoughts and intentions. He saw the universe as an organic whole created by God, each individual being an embodiment of God's wisdom and power.
Second, Berkeley argues that our perception and knowledge of the universe is acquired through sensory experience. He put forward the idea that "being perceived is being", that is, the existence of objects is dependent on our perception. Berkeley argues that the physical world does not exist on its own, but is constructed and shaped by our perceptions. He rejects Locke's idea that matter exists independently, arguing that the material world is a perceptual phenomenon that does not exist outside of our perception.
In Berkeley's view, God is the only real and existential entity, while the physical world is simply the result of our perception and experience. He used the concepts of "spirit" and "will" to describe the nature of God. Berkeley believed that our perception and experience could only be achieved through the will and power of God, and that the physical world was simply the expression of God's thoughts in our sensory experience.
Berkeley's theological stance had a profound impact on philosophy and theology. First, his subjective idealistic view challenged the traditional materialist and materialist views. He emphasized the importance of perception and experience to our understanding of the world, and argued that the existence of the world is God-centered. This had a huge impact on the philosophical world of the time, triggering a rethinking of issues such as epistemology, epistemology, and metaphysics.
Second, Berkeley's theological stance also had an impact on religious belief. His view emphasizes the existence of God and the relationship between God and the universe, which is a powerful support for believers. Berkeley's theological position provided a philosophical foundation that somehow bridged the gap between faith and reason.
However, Berkeley's views have also sparked some criticism. Some philosophers believe that he relies too much on subjective experience and ignores the objective existence of the material world. Berkeley's subjective idealism, they argued, could not explain our universal and stable perception and experience of the material world.
Overall, Berkeley's theological stance emphasizes the existence of God and the nature of the universe. He believed that God was the creator and sustainer of the universe and that the physical world was simply the result of our perception and experience. Berkeley's ideas had a profound impact on philosophy and religion, challenging traditional materialistic views and providing a philosophical foundation imbued with reason and faith. However, Berkeley's views have also faced criticism, with some arguing that he relies too much on subjective experience and ignores the objective existence of the material world. Discussion of Berkeley's theological position will continue to advance the field of philosophy and theology.
B. God as the source and sustainer of existence
Berkeley's theological position holds that God is the source and sustainer of the universe. He emphasized God's existence and infinite wisdom, believing that God is the creator and the force that sustains all existence. In Berkeley's view, God is the foundation of the universe and the source of existence.
First, Berkeley believed that God was the creator of the universe. He firmly believed that God created everything in the universe, including physical and spiritual existence. Berkeley believed that the world did not exist forever, but was created by the will and power of God. God created all things with infinite wisdom and power, giving them to existence.
Second, Berkeley believed that God was the sustainer of the universe. He emphasized God's involvement and ongoing attention, believing that God was not only the Creator, but also the force that kept the universe running. Berkeley believed that God maintains everything in the universe through divine intent and guidance. God's presence and care allows the universe to remain orderly and stable.
Berkeley likened the universe to the embodiment of God's thoughts and intentions. He put forward the idea that "being perceived is being", arguing that the existence of objects depends on our perception. According to this view, everything in the universe is manifested by God's mind in our sensory experience. Berkeley believed that our perception and experience can only be achieved through God's will and power, and that the physical world is simply the expression of God's mind in our sensory experience.
Berkeley's ideas have had a profound impact on our understanding of the universe and the meaning of existence. His position emphasizes the importance of God's existence and as the source and sustainer of the universe. Berkeley's theological position provides a theoretical framework that allows us to think about and explore the nature and purpose of the universe. God's presence and participation gives meaning and order to the universe, giving meaning and purpose to our lives and existence.
However, Berkeley's views have also drawn some criticism and questioning. Some argue that Berkeley overemphasizes the importance of subjective experience and perception and ignores the objective existence of the material world. They question whether God exists only in our sensory experience and whether God is truly the creator and sustainer of the universe.
In response to these criticisms, Berkeley's supporters argue that Berkeley's view does not reject the objective existence of the material world, but emphasizes that our understanding of the universe is obtained through perception and experience. They argue that Berkeley's theological position provides a philosophical foundation that unites faith and reason and prompts us to think about the nature of the universe and the meaning of existence.
Overall, Berkeley's theological position sees God as the source and sustainer of the universe. He emphasized God's presence and participation, arguing that God created everything in the universe and maintained its operation through divine intent and guidance. Berkeley's view challenges the traditional materialistic view, emphasizing the importance of perception and experience in our understanding of the universe. However, his views have also faced criticism and questioning, with some believing that he places too much emphasis on subjective experience and ignores the objective existence of the material world. Discussion of Berkeley's theological position will continue to advance the field of philosophy and theology.
C. The connection between God's existence and the physical world
Berkeley's theological stance holds that God is the source and sustainer of the universe and emphasizes the connection between God and the physical world. Although Berkeley firmly believes that the existence of the material world is limited to our perception and experience, he also makes some points to explain the relationship between God and the physical world.
First, Berkeley believed that the physical world was the expression of God's mind in our sensory experience. He put forward the idea that "being perceived is being", arguing that the existence of objects depends on our perception. In other words, the physical world exists because God has given us the ability to perceive and experience them. Berkeley sees the physical world as a projection of God's created thoughts in our sensory experience, and the objects we perceive are actually God's form of thought.
Second, Berkeley believed that the physical world was the embodiment of God's intentions. He saw the physical world as the result of God's creation with infinite wisdom and intention. Berkeley believed that God created everything with infinite wisdom and expressed His intentions and purposes through the physical world. Every thing in the physical world is endowed with specific properties and laws, which are the embodiment of God's arrangement and design of the universe.
Although Berkeley believed that the material world existed in our perception and experience, he did not deny the objective reality of the material world. He argues that the existence of the material world depends not only on our perception, but on being independent of us. Berkeley emphasized God's role as the creator and sustainer of the universe, arguing that God's existence gives objective existence and meaning to the material world.
However, Berkeley's views have raised some questions. Some believe that Berkeley's position is too subjective and ignores the independent existence and objective reality of the material world. They question whether God exists only in our sensory experience and how Berkeley explains the laws of nature and scientific principles in the physical world.
In response to these doubts, Berkeley's supporters argue that Berkeley's view does not reject the objective reality of the material world, but emphasizes that our understanding of the universe is obtained through perception and experience. They argue that Berkeley's position provides a philosophical foundation that combines faith and reason and prompts us to think about the nature of the universe and the meaning of existence.
In critiquing Berkeley's position, some also focus on the objectivity of the material world. They argue that although Berkeley's ideas emphasize the importance of perception and experience, the objective reality of the material world can be explained and explored through scientific and rational methods. Scientific research reveals the laws and principles of the material world, which does not mean that the material world is merely the product of subjective experience.
Overall, Berkeley's theological position emphasizes the connection between God and the physical world. He believed that the physical world was the expression of God's mind in our sensory experience and the embodiment of God's intentions. Berkeley's view challenges the traditional materialistic view, emphasizing the importance of perception and experience in our understanding of the universe. However, his views have also faced criticism and questioning, with some believing that he places too much emphasis on subjective experience and ignores the objective existence of the material world. Discussion of Berkeley's theological position will continue to advance the field of philosophy and theology in the quest for deeper understanding and exploration of God's relationship to the physical world.
IV. The relationship between perception, reality and consciousness
A. The observer's perception and the construction of objects
Berkeley's position is that the existence and properties of an object depend on the perception of the observer. He put forward the idea that "being perceived is being", arguing that objects can only exist in our perception. In this view, the observer's perception plays a crucial role, not only bringing things into our consciousness, but also giving them shape, color, and other properties.
According to Berkeley, objects are not independently existing entities, but the result of our perception and experience. The objects we see are actually God's form of thought, God reveals His intention and creation through our perception.
The observer's perception plays a dual role: on the one hand, it gives the object existence and form through perception; On the other hand, it also limits our knowledge of objects. Berkeley believes that we can only recognize the external characteristics of objects, such as color, shape, and hardness, through sensory and sensory experience. We cannot directly touch the essence and internal structure of objects because they are beyond our ability to perceive.
The observer's perception also involves the concepts of space and time. Berkeley argues that the existence of an object is linked to our perception of its spatial location and point in time. He said that the position of objects in space and their presence in time are interrelated, and when we observe objects, our perception of their location and time also affects our understanding of their existence.
Berkeley also proposed a view of explaining the construction of objects, called the "principle of closure." According to this principle, the formation of objects is constructed through a series of perceptual events in our sensory experience. When we receive various perceptual signals from objects through our senses, our brain integrates these signals to form an overall perception of the object. This process involves our perception of properties such as shape, color, texture, etc., and combining them together to form a complete concept of the object.
However, Berkeley's stance has also raised some doubts and criticism. It has been argued that Berkeley overemphasized the role of subjective perception and ignored the objective reality of the object itself. They point out that the existence and properties of objects should be independent of our perception and consciousness, and not just our perception of them. They argue that Berkeley's ideas cannot explain the existence and properties of objects outside of our perception.
In addition, some have questioned whether Berkeley's ideas apply to objects that we cannot directly perceive, such as microscopic particles or distant galaxies. Berkeley's ideas seem to apply more to conventional objects that we can perceive, while his position may require further exploration and argument for things that are beyond our perception.
Overall, Berkeley's view emphasizes the relationship between the observer's perception and the construction of objects. The perception of the observer not only determines the existence and properties of the object, but also limits our knowledge of the object. However, Berkeley's views have also faced criticism and questioning, with some arguing that he places too much emphasis on the role of subjective perception and ignores the objective reality of the object itself. Further exploration and debate on these questions will help us better understand the relationship between the observer's perception and the construction of objects.
B. The subjectivity and relativity of reality
Berkeley's ideas sparked a series of discussions about the subjectivity and relativity of reality. His position is that the existence and properties of an object depend on the perception of the observer, which means that each observer may have different perceptions and experiences and therefore draw different conclusions. This view of subjectivity and relativity has an important impact on the understanding and interpretation of reality.
First, Berkeley's argument emphasizes the role of the individual observer. He believes that each of our perceptions of things is unique, based on factors such as our sensory abilities, experience, and knowledge. Therefore, each person may have a different perception and understanding of the same object. For example, for a flower, one person may perceive its color, shape, and fragrance, while another person may only perceive its color. This subjectivity allows everyone to have their own unique perspective and perception of the world.
Second, Berkeley's view relates to the relationship between the observer and the outside world. He argues that our perceptions and experiences are the result of our interactions with the outside world, which itself is not an independent entity. Therefore, our knowledge of the world is relative to our perception and experience, rather than absolute, objective. This relativity means that different observers may have different perceptions and interpretations, and may even come to different conclusions when confronted with the same phenomenon.
Berkeley's ideas also provoke deep thinking about the relationship between subjectivity and objectivity in reality. Some argue that Berkeley's view places too much emphasis on subjectivity and ignores the objective existence of the outside world. They argue that while our perception and experience are influenced by subjective factors, the external world still has independent reality and regularity. They believe that although our perception is limited, we can gradually approach objective truth through scientific research and rational reasoning.
Others, however, place more emphasis on the importance of subjectivity and relativity. They believe that our perception and experience are our only way of contacting reality, and that we cannot directly understand the nature and truth of the world. They point out that any description and interpretation of reality we have is constructed based on our subjective experience and language, and is therefore relative. They argue that accepting the subjectivity and relativity of reality can help us be more humble and open to different perspectives and interpretations.
In addition to the field of philosophy, Berkeley's ideas have also sparked some discussion and application. In cognitive science and psychology, for example, researchers have drawn on Berkeley's ideas to explore the mechanisms of human perception and perception. They study how human perception of the outside world is constructed and interpreted, and how it is influenced by subjective factors.
Overall, Berkeley's argument emphasizes the subjectivity and relativity of reality. He argues that the existence and properties of an object depend on the perception of the observer, which leads to the fact that each observer may have different perceptions and understandings. This view of subjectivity and relativity has influenced our understanding of reality and has sparked discussions about the relationship between subjectivity and objectivity. Deep reflection on these questions will help us better understand the nature of perception, cognition, and reality.
C. The role and role of consciousness
Consciousness is a complex and mysterious subject that touches on the core of human thinking, perception, and experience. Berkeley's ideas offer some interesting reflections on understanding the role and role of consciousness. Although Berkeley does not explore the nature of consciousness in detail, his philosophical views provide researchers with a way to think about consciousness in terms of subjectivity and relativity.
1. The relationship between consciousness and perception
Berkeley argues that our perception of reality depends on our consciousness. He argues that our perception is the product of our mental activity, that is, that the world we perceive is constructed by our consciousness. This view emphasizes the importance of consciousness in the process of perception.
Consciousness helps us transform external stimuli into meaningful experiences through perceptual mechanisms. Our sensory system converts physical stimuli into neural signals, which are then transmitted to the brain, where they are ultimately interpreted and integrated by consciousness. Consciousness gives us the subjective experience and understanding of perceptual information, enabling us to discern and interpret different sensory inputs.
In addition, Berkeley's view emphasizes the selectivity of consciousness for perception. He argues that our consciousness is selective, that we can only perceive certain perceptual information and ignore or filter out others. This selectivity means that consciousness plays an important filtering and organizing role in perception, helping us extract useful information from the vast amount of sensory input.
2. The relationship between consciousness and individual psychology
Berkeley's ideas also deal with the relationship between consciousness and individual psychology. He believes that our consciousness is part of our individual psychology and the basis of our thinking, emotions, and will. Consciousness is our reflection of ourselves and the external world, the subject of our thinking and experience.
Consciousness acts as a link between different mental processes in an individual's psyche. It allows us to relate past experiences and memories with current perceptions to form continuous subjective experiences. Awareness also enables us to reflect and evaluate our thinking and behavior, guiding us in decisions and choices.
In addition, consciousness is closely related to the individual's self-awareness and self-knowledge. It enables us to consciously perceive our thoughts, feelings, and actions, and to reflect on and evaluate them. Consciousness gives us subjective experiences of our identity and existence, helping us to form a perception of ourselves.
3. The relationship between consciousness and reality construction
Berkeley's view emphasizes the role of consciousness in constructing reality. He argues that our consciousness is the basis of our perception and understanding of the external world, and that our experiences and cognition are constructed through consciousness.
Consciousness constructs our subjective reality by filtering, selecting, and integrating perceptual information. Based on our perceptions and experiences, consciousness helps us construct a reality that conforms to our cognitive framework and belief system. This means that different individuals may have different perceptions and understandings of the same external world because of differences in their consciousness.
Berkeley's view also hints at the role of consciousness in shaping reality. Consciousness shapes our understanding and attitude to the world through our perceptions and experiences. It influences how we perceive and interpret the things and phenomena around us, which in turn influences our emotions, behaviors, and decisions.
4. The limitations and subjectivity of consciousness
Although consciousness plays an important role in our thinking and experience, it also has its limitations and subjectivity. Berkeley's view emphasizes each individual's subjective perception and understanding of reality. Each person's consciousness is unique and closely related to factors such as their sensory abilities, experiences, and cultural background. This means that our consciousness is influenced by individual differences and subjective preferences, which can lead to different understandings and assessments.
In addition, consciousness has certain limitations. Our consciousness is limited and can only focus on and process a limited amount of information. We cannot perceive all the perceptual inputs, nor can we be aware of all the mental processes at the same time. This limitation means that our consciousness can only provide limited information and perspective, rather than comprehensive and objective.
Taken together, Berkeley's ideas offer some valuable food for thought in understanding the role and role of consciousness. Consciousness plays an important role in perception, individual psychology, and reality construction. It helps us transform external stimuli into meaningful experiences, connect individual mental processes, and construct individual subjective reality. However, consciousness also has its limitations and subjectivity, so we need to be cautious about the subjective experience and understanding that consciousness brings. In the process of further studying consciousness, we can continue to explore Berkeley's perspectives, as well as other philosophical, psychological and neuroscientific theories, to better understand the nature and function of consciousness.
V. Implications and implications in related fields
A. The Field of Philosophy: Challenges and Enlightenment for Realist Perspectives
Berkeley's theory posed a series of powerful challenges to the realist view, as well as some inspiration for the field of philosophy. Realism is the view that there exists objective reality independent of our perception and consciousness, and it holds that the existence of the world does not depend on human perception and subjective experience. However, Berkeley raises questions and reflections through his idealistic view that make us re-examine the rationality and sustainability of the realist view.
1. The connection between perception and existence
Berkeley believed that existence is constituted by perception, that is, the existence of the world depends on our perception and consciousness. He points out how our perception of the external world translates into subjective experience and conscious activity. This view challenges the realist view of the existence of objective reality independent of our cognition and consciousness.
According to Berkeley, the existence of the world is closely related to our perception. It emphasizes the positive role of cognitive agents in constructing reality, arguing that our perception and consciousness are the basis of what constitutes reality. This inspires us to revisit the realist definition of reality, reminding us not to lose sight of the role and influence of the cognitive agent.
2. Language and conceptual limitations
Berkeley's ideas also involve the limits of language and concepts on our perception and description of the world. He points out that our concepts and language are based on our perceptual and conscious activities, which are our subjective constructs of the external world. This view challenges the realist view because it reminds us that our concepts and language are limited and may not fully capture and describe the nature of objective reality.
Berkeley's ideas inspire us to think deeply about concepts and the use of language. It reminds us to be careful about the role of concepts and language in our perception and description of the world. We need to recognize that concepts and language are only tools for our subjective construction and may not accurately reflect the diversity and complexity of objective reality. Therefore, when studying and discussing realism, we should be aware of the limitations of concepts and language, and try to adopt a more open and pluralistic perspective to understand and describe the world.
3. The relativity and change of ideas
Berkeley's view also involves the relativity and change of ideas. He argues that our perceptions are based on factors such as individual differences, cultural backgrounds, and ways of thinking, which means that different individuals may have different understandings and assessments of the same external world because of their differences in consciousness.
This view presents an important challenge to the realist view, namely the relativity of objective reality. If our ideas are subjective, relative, and differ in different societies and cultures, how can we determine true objective reality? This question leads us to think about the nature of objective reality, objective truth, and cultural relativism.
Berkeley's ideas inspire us to re-examine the relativity and diversity of realist perspectives, and help us recognize that the concept of objective reality may have certain limitations and dilemmas. We need to be more open and inclusive of different perceptions and understandings in order to better understand and respect the diversity of human cognition.
4. The connection between values and ethical issues
Berkeley's theory also provokes our thinking about values and ethical issues. If the existence of the world is based on our perception and consciousness, then how do we determine values and ethical standards? This question becomes particularly important in the realist view, which is often associated with questions such as objective truth, moral values, and so on.
Berkeley's view reminds us that in exploring the realist view, we need to recognize that values are subjective and can be influenced by individual differences and cultural contexts. This means that our values cannot be seen simply as objectively existing criteria, but rather as the selection and evaluation of human subjects.
To sum up, Berkeley's ideas present a series of powerful challenges and inspirations for the rationality and sustainability of the realist view in the field of philosophy. By emphasizing the connection between perception and existence, the limitations of language and concepts, the relativity and variability of ideas, and the connection between values and ethical issues, he revisits the realist view and reminds us to think and reflect on it more deeply. In further research and discussion of realism, we can draw on Berkeley's ideas, as well as other philosophical perspectives, to think and explore the nature and meaning of existence from a more holistic and open perspective.
B. Field of psychology: research foundations of perception and cognition
Berkeley's philosophical views provide an important foundation and enlightenment for the study of psychology, especially perception and cognition. His idealistic view emphasizes the connection between perception and existence, as well as the limitations of language and concepts, which have profound implications for our understanding of the nature and mechanisms of perception and cognitive processes.
1. The connection between perception and existence
Berkeley believed that our perceptual and conscious activities constitute the existence of the world, and that the existence of the external world depends on our perception. This view has had an important impact on the study of perception in the field of psychology. Traditionally, perception has been thought of as a passive process of receiving information from the outside world, but Berkeley's view reminds us that perception is an active process of constructing reality.
When studying the process of perception, psychologists begin to pay attention to the influence of subjective experience and individual differences on perception. They explored the initiative and constructivity of perception, and researchers began to focus on the subject role of perception and the interaction between perception and cognition, emotion, and individual experience. This shifts the study of perception from a simple model of physical input-neural processing-cognitive output to a more comprehensive and complex perspective, allowing us to better understand the connection between perception and subjective experience.
2. Language and conceptual limitations
Berkeley points out that our concepts and language are based on our perceptual and conscious activities, which constitute our subjective constructs of the external world. This has had an important impact on the study of cognitive psychology. Traditionally, cognitive psychology has focused primarily on the symbolic processing of thinking and perception, while ignoring the role of concepts and language in cognition.
However, Berkeley's point reminds us of the limitations of concepts and language. It prompts psychologists to re-examine the role of concepts and language in cognitive processes, and to conduct research related to language, classification, and thinking. They began to focus on the role of language in shaping thinking and cognition, studying the establishment and evolution of concepts, and the influence of cultural and individual differences on concepts and language use. This allows us to understand cognition more comprehensively, moving from a simple symbolic processing model to a more comprehensive and culturally relative perspective.
3. The subjectivity of perception and cognition
Berkeley's idealist view also emphasized the subjectivity of perception and cognition. He argues that our perceptions are based on factors such as individual differences, cultural backgrounds, and ways of thinking, which means that different individuals may have different understandings and assessments of the same external world because of their differences in consciousness.
This view has had an important impact on the study of subjective experience and individual differences in the field of psychology. Psychologists began to focus on the subjectivity of subjective experience and studied the role of individual differences in perceptual and cognitive processes. They explored the role of individuals in perception and cognition, studying individual differences in attention, memory, decision-making, and problem solving. This makes our understanding of cognitive processes more detailed and deep, recognizing the importance of individual differences and subjective experiences for cognition.
4. Recognize the relationship between the subject and objective reality
Berkeley's view reminds us that the relationship between cognitive subject and objective reality is not simple and clear. He points out that our concepts and language are subjectively constructed and may not accurately reflect the nature and complexity of objective reality. This has an important impact on the relationship between objective truth, objective standards, and cognition in psychology.
Psychologists began to focus on the relationship between cognition and objective reality, and explored the limitations of objectivity in cognition. Some studies have shown that our cognition is affected by factors such as perceptual choice, attention bias, cognitive bias, etc., which may lead to a certain gap between the subject's cognition and objective reality. This makes our understanding of cognition more humble and open, reminding us to carefully handle the relationship between cognitive subjects and objective reality to avoid oversimplification or misunderstanding.
To sum up, Berkeley's philosophical views provide an important foundation and enlightenment for the study of perception and cognition in the field of psychology. He emphasizes the connection between perception and existence, the limitations of language and concepts, and the subjectivity of perception and cognition, causing us to rethink the nature and mechanisms of perception and cognition. By borrowing from Berkeley's views, psychologists began to pay attention to the subjective constructivity, individual differences and cultural relativity of perception and cognition, and paid more attention to the role of subjective experience, concepts and language in their research to understand the process of perception and cognition more comprehensively and accurately.
C. Field of cognitive science: ways of thinking about the nature of the world and the nature of consciousness
Berkeley's philosophical ideas and his discussion of perception and cognition in The New Theory of Vision have had a profound impact on the field of modern cognitive science. His views triggered a re-examination of the way of thinking about the nature of the world and the nature of consciousness, and promoted the development and progress of cognitive science.
1. Reflect on the mystery of the gaze
Berkeley proposed the concept of the "reflective gaze" in The New Theory of Vision. He pointed out that when each of us gazes at external objects, we actually construct our cognition of the world through the mind presenting perceptual information to ourselves. This view has had an important impact on the study of perception in the field of cognitive science.
Traditionally, people have thought of vision as a process of passively receiving information from the outside world, but Berkeley's view reminds us that vision is a process of actively constructing reality. In cognitive science, researchers began to pay attention to the initiative and construction of subjects in the perception process, and carried out relevant empirical research.
Using eye trackers, brain imaging and other technologies, researchers have found that people's fixation and eye movements are not simply determined by visual stimuli, but by factors such as individual attention, expectations, experiences, and goals. This process of active selection and construction of subjects re-emphasizes Berkeley's view that the subjectivity of perception and the subjective experience of the individual are important in cognition.
2. Consciousness and subjective experience
Berkeley's philosophical ideas also had an important influence on the study of the nature of consciousness and subjective experience. He argues that our conscious activity constitutes the existence of the world, and that the existence of the external world depends on our consciousness. This has inspired the exploration and study of consciousness.
In the field of cognitive science, researchers are beginning to focus on the study of subjective experience and consciousness. By combining methods from neuroscience and psychology, they explore the mechanisms by which consciousness is produced and the relationship between consciousness and brain activity. The development of neuroimaging technology has allowed researchers to understand the processes involved in consciousness by monitoring brain activity while observers perform specific tasks.
In addition, the researchers also explored different levels and dimensions of consciousness. They studied self-awareness, time perception, stream of consciousness, and unconventional states of consciousness such as the subconscious and dreams. These studies have led to a deeper and more comprehensive understanding of the nature of consciousness, the relationship between consciousness and cognitive processes, and the subjective experience of individuals.
3. Recognize the relationship between the subject and objective reality
Berkeley's ideas also prompted cognitive science to rethink the relationship between cognitive subjects and objective reality. Traditionally, it has been assumed that the external world exists independently, and that our perception and cognition reflect the real objective world by receiving and processing external stimuli. However, Berkeley's views challenge that perception.
Research in cognitive science shows that our perception and cognition are influenced by a variety of factors, including attention, expectations, situations, and individual differences. Our perception and cognition do not simply reflect objective reality, but are constructed and interpreted results. Researchers are beginning to focus on the constructivity and relativity of cognition, studying the role of language and concepts, and the impact of individual and cultural differences on cognition.
This rethinking of the relationship between cognitive subject and objective reality makes our understanding of cognition more humble and open. We are aware of the role of individual and cultural differences, concepts, and language in shaping cognition, as well as that our cognition is limited and relative. This way of thinking has brought new directions and research questions to the field of cognitive science.
To sum up, Berkeley's New Theory of Vision has had an important impact on the field of modern cognitive science. His ideas triggered a re-examination of ways of thinking about the nature of the world and the nature of consciousness, and drove developments and advances in the field of cognitive science. Through reflection on the reflective gaze, consciousness and subjective experience, and cognitive subjects and objective reality, we can better understand the nature of perception and cognition, the characteristics of human consciousness, and the role of individuals in cognitive processes. This way of thinking provides a new perspective and theoretical basis for the research of cognitive science, and promotes the continuous development and innovation of the field.
VI. Conclusion
A. Summary: Berkeley's New Theory of Vision is important for exploring the issues of existence, perception, reality, and consciousness in the material world.
Berkeley's New Theory of Vision proposes a philosophical idea that subverts traditional ideas and has a profound impact on the exploration of important questions such as existence, perception, reality, and consciousness of the material world. His views challenged the prevailing material realism at the time and emphasized the initiative and constructivity of the subject in the process of perception and cognition. These ideas have attracted widespread attention and research in the field of modern cognitive science, and have provided new ways of thinking for our understanding of the world.
Through The New Theory of Vision, Berkeley questioned the material reality of external objects. He argues that the existence of objects depends on our perceptual and conscious activities, denying the independence of material existence. His view is based on one of his theories that "to be is to be perceived." According to this theory, objects exist because they are perceived by our perceptual consciousness, without which objects cannot exist. This view sparked a rethinking of material reality and advanced philosophical discussions about the nature of the material world.
In the field of modern cognitive science, Berkeley's ideas have also triggered a re-examination of perceptual and cognitive processes. Traditionally, perception has been thought of as a passive process of receiving external stimuli, but Berkeley's view reminds us that perception is an active process of constructing reality. We construct our perception of the world by presenting perceptual information to ourselves through the mind. This process of active selection and construction of subjects recognizes the subjectivity of perception and the importance of subjective experience of individuals in cognition.
Developments in modern cognitive science research further support Berkeley's view. Using techniques such as eye trackers and brain imaging, researchers have found that our fixation and eye movements are not simply controlled by external stimuli, but by factors such as attention, expectations, experience, and goals. This means that our perception does not objectively reflect the external world, but is regulated and influenced by individual internal factors. This rethinking of the subjectivity and relativity of perception has led us to a deeper understanding of the constructivity and individual differences of cognition.
In addition, Berkeley's ideas have had an important impact on the study of consciousness. He argues that our conscious activity constitutes the existence of the world, and that the existence of the external world depends on our consciousness. This view inspired the development and exploration of modern consciousness research. By combining neuroscience and psychological methods, researchers began to study the mechanisms of consciousness and the relationship between consciousness and brain activity. They study self-awareness, temporal perception, stream of consciousness, and unconventional states of consciousness such as the subconscious and dreams. These studies have led to a deeper and more comprehensive understanding of the nature of consciousness, the relationship between consciousness and cognitive processes, and the subjective experience of individuals.
Finally, Berkeley's New Theory of Vision also prompted cognitive science to rethink the relationship between cognitive subjects and objective reality. His views emphasize the initiative and constructivity of individuals in perceptual and cognitive processes, and challenge the independent existence of the external world. The development of modern cognitive science has further strengthened the understanding of the constructive and relative nature of cognition, and researchers have begun to pay attention to the influence of individual and cultural differences, concepts and language on cognition. This rethinking of the relationship between cognitive subject and objective reality makes our understanding of cognition more humble, open and pluralistic.
All in all, Berkeley's New Theory of Vision is important for exploring issues such as existence, perception, reality, and consciousness in the material world. His ideas sparked a re-examination of material reality and advanced the field of modern cognitive science. Through thinking about the initiative and constructivity of the subject in perception and cognition, we can better understand the nature of perception and cognition, the characteristics of human consciousness, and the role of individuals in cognitive processes. Berkeley's ideas provide us with a new way of thinking, enrich our understanding of the nature of the world, and provide a new perspective and theoretical basis for cognitive science research.
B. Influences and Implications: The work has had a profound impact on the fields of philosophy, psychology, and cognitive science, inspiring new ways of thinking about the nature of the world and the nature of consciousness.
Berkeley's New Theory of Vision not only sparked extensive philosophical discussions at the time, but also had a profound impact on the development of modern psychology and cognitive science. It prompts us to re-examine the nature of the world and the nature of consciousness, and provides new ways of thinking about exploring cognitive processes, perception, and reality construction. These implications and implications are explored below.
First, Berkeley's New Theory of Vision had an important impact on the field of philosophy. Traditional philosophy asserts the independent existence of the material world, and Berkeley's view challenges this material realism. He argues that the existence of objects depends on our perceptual and conscious activities, denying the independence of material existence. This view led to a rethinking of material reality and advanced the inquiry into the nature of the world in the field of philosophy. Berkeley's ideas brought about a new way of looking at the world, emphasizing the initiative and constructivity of the subject, and providing philosophers with new ways of thinking about consciousness, existence, and reality.
In the field of psychology, Berkeley's views have also had an important impact. Traditionally, perception has been thought of as a passive process of receiving external stimuli, but Berkeley's view reminds us that perception is an active process of constructing reality. We construct our perception of the world by presenting perceptual information to ourselves through the mind. This process of active selection and construction of subjects recognizes the subjectivity of perception and the importance of subjective experience of individuals in cognition. Modern psychological research further supports Berkeley's view, revealing the moderating effect of factors such as attention, expectations, experience, and goals on perception. This re-examination of the subjectivity and relativity of perception has led us to a deeper understanding of the nature of cognition and perception.
In addition, Berkeley's New Theory of Vision has also had important implications for the field of cognitive science. His views emphasize the initiative and constructivity of the subject in the process of perception and cognition, and challenge the independent existence of the external world. The development of modern cognitive science has further strengthened the understanding of the constructive and relative nature of cognition, and researchers have begun to pay attention to the influence of individual and cultural differences, concepts and language on cognition. Berkeley's ideas push us to rethink the relationship between cognitive subject and objective reality, making our understanding of cognition more humble, open, and pluralistic. This new way of thinking provides a new perspective and theoretical basis for cognitive science research.
In addition, Berkeley's New Theory of Vision had an important impact on the study of consciousness. He argues that our conscious activity constitutes the existence of the world, and that the existence of the external world depends on our consciousness. This view inspired the development and exploration of modern consciousness research. By combining neuroscience and psychological methods, researchers began to study the mechanisms of consciousness and the relationship between consciousness and brain activity. They study self-awareness, temporal perception, stream of consciousness, and unconventional states of consciousness such as the subconscious and dreams. These studies have led to a deeper and more comprehensive understanding of the nature of consciousness, the relationship between consciousness and cognitive processes, and the subjective experience of individuals.
After discussing the influence and implications of Berkeley's New Theory of Vision, we can conclude that this work had a profound impact on the fields of philosophy, psychology, and cognitive science. It stimulates new ways of thinking about the nature of the world and the nature of consciousness, and provides new perspectives for exploring cognitive processes and perceptual reality construction. Through an in-depth study of Berkeley's ideas, we can better understand the nature of perception and cognition, the characteristics of human consciousness, and the role of individuals in cognitive processes. Berkeley's ideas provide us with a new way of thinking, enrich our understanding of the nature of the world, and provide a new perspective and theoretical basis for research in the fields of philosophy, psychology, and cognitive science.
Bibliography:
Berkeley. (1710). New Visual Theory. Shanghai Zhonghua Book Company.
Block, N. (1996). How Not to Find the Neural Signature of Consciousness. In Toward a Science of Consciousness: The First Tucson Discussions and Debates (pp. 3-12). MIT Press.
Chalmers, D. J. (1995). Facing up to the problem of consciousness. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 2(3), 200-219.
Noë, A. (2004). Action in perception. MIT Press.
Pylyshyn, Z. W. (2003). Seeing and Visualizing: It's Not What You Think. MIT Press.
Seth, A. & Tsakiris, M. (2018). Being a Beast Machine: The Somatic Basis of Selfhood. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 22(11), 969-981.
Tse, P. U. (2005). Neural correlates of visual consciousness. In The Blackwell Companion to Consciousness (pp. 314-328). Blackwell Publishing.
Varela, F. J., Thompson, E., & Rosch, E. (1991). The Embodied Mind: Cognitive Science and Human Experience. MIT Press.