Today's mainland universities have four harms:
The first is to pinch the top students in the college entrance examination, but it is to cultivate talents for the United States.
The second is to blindly chase international rankings and lose the foundation of national education.
Third, for the so-called internationalization, a large number of "foreign garbage" international students are enrolled.
The fourth is to give international students "supranational treatment", which is endlessly harmful.
For the first question, Professor Zheng Qiang once publicly attacked Qingbei: Do you think you are proud to be admitted to Tsinghua Peking University? In fact, this is an even greater sadness, because the new blood that the country has worked hard to cultivate has finally gone to European and American countries to contribute.
Brain drain is resentment, and the recruitment of a large number of "foreign garbage" international students is a broken root.
Exploring why Chinese universities are keen to recruit "foreign garbage" is nothing more than the so-called international hat.
Because the number of international students introduced is directly related to whether it is an international university ranking.
If you ask, why is a ranking so important?
Because the ranking will represent the university's merits.
Moreover, because the ranking is directly related to someone's promotion, funding and other vital interests.
A ranking, throwing temptation, for the public and private, for fame and profit, rack your brains, go all out.
Who is manipulating this ranking?
The three most famous publishers of the World University Rankings are Quacquarelli Symonds (QS) World University Rankings in the UK, Times Higher Education World University Rankings in the UK, and U.S. in the US. News World University Rankings.
Take a closer look, there are two major characteristics, do you find it?
First, there is no Chinese participation at all.
The second is, all were formulated by the Anglo-Saxons.
Don't say you don't know, say it's shocking.
As a century-old-stirring stick, the Angsa people have gone to great lengths to come up with these world university rankings, is it just to popularize the world's famous schools to students?
If you really think so naively, you will be successful.
What are the criteria for seeing these rankings?
Number of papers and citations, proportion of international faculty, ratio of international students, academic reputation, employer reputation, etc.
It seems tall, but it actually contains evil intentions.
You see, who sets the standards? Who will judge the criteria?
Whoever holds the knife handle has the power of life and death over the ranking.
The golden woman threw bricks and introduced jade, and asked a small cotton standard, why can the West blackmail many famous brands and block Xinjiang cotton?
There are ideologies, there are economic interests, and there are political games.
To apply to the world university rankings, it will only be more than that.
For example, the number of citations in the paper. Here is a question, where is the most authoritative paper?
Anzakh said, of course, the so-called international periodicals of the West.
The people of Onsa also said that SCI is authoritative and has a high scientific and technological content.
Today, the number of SCI papers published in the mainland far exceeds that of the United States by 10 times. But has China become the world's number one technology power?
People are doing business, and some people take this as the truth.
The number of SCI papers published by domestic universities does not prove how good they are, on the contrary, it will only prove that people are stupid and have more money.
You may not know what a lot of business this is. Just by publishing SCI papers as an example, domestic universities and scientific research institutions have to give away as much as 30 billion every year!
And the Liaoning is only 20 billion, which is equivalent to one and a half Liaoning aircraft carriers to the United States a year!
Where is this publishing journal, it's just a crazy money printing machine!
Another example is the proportion of international students.
In short, it is the proportion of international students in universities, and the higher the better.
According to this criterion of Onsa, the more international students there are, the more international they are, the higher the university rankings.
What if the university can't recruit international students through normal channels?
There is no hurry, the mountain people have their own methods.
Unexpectedly, many domestic universities have lowered the enrollment standards for international students, increased the amount of subsidies, provided high-end accommodation conditions, and even provided "student companions" to increase their attractiveness. In short, as long as you can recruit international students, you will not hesitate to provide "supranational treatment".
Domestic students are admitted to good universities, which is comparable to ascending to the sky, but foreigners can get low scores and even come to China to study in universities without examinations!
As a result, foreign garbage is everywhere, and Chinese people want to enter foreign countries.
How absurd?
The highest scholarship for domestic students is 10,000, and the living allowance for international students is as high as 100,000 a year!
Just like this, there are brick families shouting beasts, and the subsidies for international students are too small.
What is injustice?
This is the biggest injustice!
Another example is the so-called international teacher ratio. The same reason is the same as above, both of which are convenient for transporting "foreign garbage" to China.
Why can foreign criminals become university teachers in China?
Why do foreign teachers dare to kill female college students in China?
Not "supranational treatment" habitually?
Those who benefit are obvious and shallow; Those who have a good name are hidden and deep.
University chaos, digging deep into the source, the root is blind internationalization.
Let's look at what is the sacredness of QS?
It turns out that QS is neither a scientific research institution nor an academic institution, but just an educational intermediary for studying abroad!
Why is the World University Rankings produced by such an intermediary regarded as the highest honor and even the goal of many domestic universities?
Why is it that in the eyes of many universities in China, QS is more in awe of the UK study abroad institution than the Ministry of Education?
Because with the help of this ranking, you can prove your "internationalization".
A world university ranking, why can domestic universities turn around?
If you ask for others, you will be subject to others.
Therefore, in order to prove their "internationalization", some universities desperately made overtures to Anza.
Accepting this ranking means that domestic universities themselves have given the initiative to judge the merits to the West.
Imagine that the "Seven Sons of National Defense", who has trained the chief designer of the Tiangong for the country and countless aerospace talents, is not as ranked as the universities of small Southeast Asian countries.
How ridiculous?
For no other reason, the Anzakhs hold the right to speak in the rankings.
A university that aspires to cultivate talents for the country, of course, does not need to introduce any "foreign students".
But in the eyes of the Anzax, you are not "international" enough. This item is zero, and the ranking can be high, to hell.
On the contrary, those universities that send talent to the United States and Britain will be ranked highly.
Serving foreigners, there are more traitors, of course, foreigners say hello, and the ranking is high.
Those who serve the countrymen and win glory for the country, of course, the foreigners deny you and deliberately pull down the ranking.
Look at which Chinese universities have been sanctioned since the United States launched its science and technology war?
Why are some universities famous but never sanctioned by the United States? You know why.
Therefore, in the view of Jin Xia, the so-called world university ranking is just another public opinion war.
The battlefield of public opinion, if we do not occupy it, it will be occupied by the enemy.
What is a good university in China?
If we don't set standards, others will "set" us and then distort our values and counter us.
Otherwise, what kind of Western aesthetic "squinting" will emerge one after another.
Fortunately, it finally began to straighten the chaos.
Last year, Renmin University fired the first shot to break away from Western ranking standards.
The NPC announced that from 2022, it will no longer participate in any international university rankings and concentrate on academic research.
Recently, Harbin Institute of Technology, one of the "Seven Sons of National Defense", reported that from the new semester of 2023, foreign students will no longer be provided with a subsidy of 100,000 yuan per academic year.
At a time when many domestic universities are spending money to buy international students for international rankings and desperately increasing subsidies for international students, HIT dares to take the lead in canceling subsidies for international students and using limited resources on their own people.
This move won applause and praise from netizens across the country.
At the same time, Wuhan University issued a notice to withdraw a total of 92 foreign students from more than 10 countries!
The removal of garbage from international students marks that Chinese universities are no longer only ranked by the West, showing cultural confidence and educational confidence.
Although I waited too long, the one who should have come finally came.
Was the former Sheng Tang strong because of international students, or was it because the Sheng Tang itself was powerful and attracted all countries to the dynasty?
Why should the strong meet the welcome, and the weak love to kneel and lick.
This is true for countries, but it is true for universities!
About author: Jin Xia, a girl from Chengdu who loves the house, and a media writer. The woman holds the sword, poisons the tongue and is kind, based on hot spots, dissecting the truth, laughing and scolding all articles, and hiding to leave all the topics.
Don't get separated, follow me!